Canon Patents

Patent: Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM

This site contains affiliate links to products and services. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Yesterday I posted a patent showing the optical formulas for both an RF 15-35mm f/4L and an RF 16-35mm f/4L. I noted that an RF 14-35mm f/4L is rumored to be coming in 2021, and I did wonder aloud if that was a type, but it appears Canon is definitely working on an RF 14-35mm f/4L optical formula.

It looks like this design of an RF 14-35mm f/4L has an internal zoom and will likely have IS as well.

Japan Patent Application 2020-190696

Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L
Focal Length 14.80mm 21.58mm 32.95mm
F Number 4.1 4.1 4.58
Half Angle of View 55.62° 45.07° 33.37°
Image Height 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
Total Lens Length 244.83mm 244.83mm 244.88mm
Backfocus 16.76mm 16.76mm 16.76mm
Canon RF 17-40mm f/4L
Focal Length 17.33mm 23.76mm 38.46
F Number 4.1 4.1 4.1
Half Angle of View 51.31° 42.32° 29.36°
Image Height 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
Total Lens Length 140.59mm 135.90mm 140.61mm
Backfocus 26.31mm 26.31mm 26.31mm

While this patent pertains to underwater housings for the optical formulas in the patent, the formula for this lens is quite detailed. Canon News discovered this patent that also shows some rather large RF prime lenses, which you can read about at Canon News.

Note: The image for this post is the Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

[tdp_random_reviews reviewstoshow=”5″]

xwxw

EOS M50
Nov 3, 2020
32
47
244.83mm? Even deducting the 20m flange, that would be 224mm long, putting this past the RF 100-500 which is only 208mm.
 

Tangent

EOS 90D
Nov 13, 2015
143
94
244.83mm? Even deducting the 20m flange, that would be 224mm long, putting this past the RF 100-500 which is only 208mm.

Good point... but maybe that length pertains to the underwater housing mentioned in the OP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

fred

EOS M50
Oct 9, 2020
31
37
"It looks like this design of an RF 14-35mm f/4L has an internal zoom."

If true, it is already better than the Nikon Z 14-30 F4 S.
 

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
CR Pro
Nov 7, 2013
4,070
4,535
Germany
If this is continuing the increase in preformance/IQ compared to the EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM I'll raise my hat to Canon for their R&D department.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

padam

EOS R
Aug 26, 2015
1,274
940
If this is continuing the increase in preformance/IQ compared to the EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM I'll raise my hat to Canon for their R&D department.
If it is only just as sharp at equivalent focal lengths while being wider as well as lighter and more compact, it is a big advancement.
They will also take care of of some other minor flaws, namely flaring, and the noisy AF during video recording.

But it's also going to cost twice as much compared to the EF lens, so it won't be as popular. But due to all camera sales continually decreasing, it's not designed to be anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

xwxw

EOS M50
Nov 3, 2020
32
47
You are correct. This may well be indicating the housing of the underwater unit which understandably would need to be much larger to allow the 14mm wide angle. Anyone could use your math to guess how long the lens may be? ;) I would guess about 120mm, which is about 10mm longer than the 16-35 F4.



1606511572915.png
 

LensFungus

EOS 90D
Apr 8, 2017
131
557
You are correct. This may well be indicating the housing of the underwater unit which understandably would need to be much larger to allow the 14mm wide angle. Anyone could use your math to guess how long the lens may be? ;) I would guess about 120mm, which is about 10mm longer than the 16-35 F4.



View attachment 194188
D looks like the cannonball from Super Mario.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users

KirkD

EOS M6 Mark II
Nov 23, 2017
93
107
Canada
kirkdurston.wixsite.com
I personally have ethical issues with Canon calling it a 14mm when it is actually 14.8mm. It would be more honest to call it a 15-34 zoom when one looks at the actual numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Bahrd

Red herrings...
Jun 30, 2013
206
145
I also have mathematical issues. Canon's cripple* rounding.

* When a distribution is skewed, such a rounding can produce a proper outcome... ;)

PS
I wouldn't blame Canon (yet) anyway... There is no direct designation of the lens' parameters in the patent. The headlines seem to rather be our host's (and the CN guy) translation/interpretation.
 

sanj

EOS R5
Jan 22, 2012
4,153
1,021
I personally have ethical issues with Canon calling it a 14mm when it is actually 14.8mm. It would be more honest to call it a 15-34 zoom when one looks at the actual numbers.
It would be prudent to hold the judgement until after the launch. This is just a rumour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Ale_F

6D - 7D
Nov 22, 2018
75
50
"It looks like this design of an RF 14-35mm f/4L has an internal zoom."

If true, it is already better than the Nikon Z 14-30 F4 S.
Despite the two RF70-200 are compact, I prefer the internal zoom like the EF17-40 and others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user