Canon News has uncovered a patent showing how to increase dynamic range using DPAF equipped sensors.
Here's a breakdown of Canon Japan Patent Application 2019-129491:
The basic idea is that during read mode, one half of the pixel is amplified at one level, and the other half is amplified at another level. reading the two simultaneously and processing can increase the dynamic range of the sensor. Basically dual ISO.
It should be noted that the patent does mention in-vehicle sensors, but can also be applied to any other type of sensor as well.
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Forget subtle focus tweaks, Canon’s Dual Pixel RAW tech can give you an additional stop in the highlights!
No, this is completely different. Current dual pixel RAW files contain the other pixel data in the secondary frame and the combined (by adding the two pixels' data together) in the main frame. But there is no difference in the amplification of the original dual pixels. With the dual gain system they could achieve a bigger than 1 stop boost.
I guess the maximum achievable benefit would be depending on the noise characteristics of the sensor. This would not help for photon shot noise, but certainly would help if read noise is a factor.
I shoot a lot of high DR scenes and have a 5D IV, but I've never gone through the trouble of using DPRaw in that way since it seems quicker and more reliable to just bracket. For me, I wouldn't enable DPRaw to extend DR unless I knew I'd be clipped otherwise to save card space just like I wouldn't bracket unless I knew I'd be clipped otherwise. The issue that keeps me from using DPRaw for increasing DR is I can't check if the file is still clipped on until I get the file off the camera and split it up into two exposures, I can only guess based on the assumption of an ~1-stop darkening in the highlights. With that said, I believe the histogram produced for captured images is really only related to the JPG preview so even that isn't a perfect measure of clipping either. Bracketing just seems more practical for conditions where the subjects aren't moving.
Current dual file RAW images give you plus one stop of DR in the highlights (which much to the Sony fanboy club puts the Canon sensor above the Sony sensor for DR at most ISO's), that is just a simple mathematical fact. Enabling dual amplification/sensitivity/ISO gives even greater mathematical potential.
Jack
But I wonder if we will see some imperfections in lenses (flares / lower contrast by stray light) which aren't visible in sensors with less DR. But maybe on reason of the improved coatings Canon promotes in the currently released lenses?!
Jack
Unfortunately no, they don't. Have you actually used this DPRSplit app? On a couple of occasions I was able to recover some highlights.
But in general it doesn't really work as expected, merged files have no additional DR and it often creates an awful greenish colour cast in the highlights.
Good to have as a last resort, but I never rely on it. And I wouldn't recommend anybody to rely on it.
The needs:
1. More effective Dynamic Range is better than lesser Dynamic Range all else being equal.
2. To put large quantities of crow into the mouths of its critics.
I have tried dprsplit and its outputs and it works very well.
You need to dual proccess the files to obtain the dynamic range benefits which is better than dual proccess one file. (Its like bracketing but with one frame).
Looking at many of the comments, it is obvious that some have not read or did not understand the patent. Are they just commenting on what they imagine it might say!
Its not simple, its is very complex, it does not interfere with DPAF Autofocus, It takes sensor noise into account, its very well thought out. The patent has several different ways of accomplishing the process too.
Read it, it goes into step by step detail for each of the different methods. Timing charts are shown for the AF Mode and Readout mode for each case.
I don't know Japanese, but I won't be surprised if the patent says nothing about DPAF at all.
For myself, I definitely find cases where DR is totally inadequate. I'm not sure if this would fix those cases, but any help is good. I'd put this to the test right away. I've just been editing 2,000 shots from a theater event. Generally, the stage is not brightly lit, then, they hit a subject with white clothing with a spot while the rest of the stage is dim, it results in a exposure nightmare. Or, there is a light in a scene, perhaps a streetlight which blows out without dropping the exposure drastically on the fly. Then, in post, there is always more noise than desirable for those shots.
I toss far more images due to exposure issues than I do with poorly focused images. The DR of my 5D MK IV and my EOS R is very good, but is still not able to capture a significant percentage of my shots unless I underexpose. Sometimes, I set EC to -2 or even more.