Patent Fun

Canon Rumors
1 Min Read

I need an interpreter
Canon Rumors needs a patent interpreter. Someone with the technical knowledge to read and translate patents that come up from time to time. Send me a message if you want to be that person. The position won’t be paid.

A patent I can read

Imaging-device cleaning apparatus

An imaging-device cleaning apparatus is attached to a camera by engaging with a lens mount of the camera typically used for attaching a camera lens. The imaging-device cleaning apparatus includes a nozzle for removing dust and dirt in the vicinity of an imaging section of the camera, and a motor and a fan for supplying air to the nozzle to remove the dust and dirt from the vicinity of an image sensor of the camera.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7697063.html

cr

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

TAGGED:
Share This Article
15 Comments
  • Can’t see this working, the Nozzel would need to be behind the mirror before the air sucked enought to remove dirt. Still A+ for effort.

  • since this appears to blow air INTO the sensor box, when can we expect B&W, HOYA, Tiffen, ETC to introduce screw on, thin frame, non-vingetting, super multi-coated HEPA filters? :-P

  • It does not suck air. The camer body recognizes the cleaner device, locks up the mirror, opens the shutter and the cleaner device blows compressed air onto the exposed sensor. The cleaner device attaches as a lens would attach.

  • Almost useless. At most, it would just move around the non-sticky dust, possibly introducing even more from the front of this contraption since it would be sucking in non-filtered air. And it would do nothing against wet or sticky dust that adheres to the LPF, those would still require a contact cleaning. Nice try though.

  • It would not be sucking in non-filtered air. The patent states that the incoming air is filtered. The idea is that high enough air pressure would get even sticky dust off. Does it work? I don’t know. Contact cleaning is very likely still necessary, but the invention is directed toward sensor cleaning–something that is much harder to clean manually than the contacts.

  • Interesting concept. I don’t recall any non-optical accessories that mount to the lens mount. I’m surprised there is only one claim, and there are elements in the patent that would make it easy to get around, but the idea is neat.

    In a nutshell, you mount this thing on your camera, it talks to the camera to make sure everything is ok and then it extends a nozzle to the sensor and blows air on it to clean it. It’s got filters on the inlet & outlet, and a variety of possible power sources. Nifty. If it was $20 I might buy one. If it was $150 I’d use my blower bulb like I do now.

  • Wow, you’ve stumbled upon a gem. This is the rare Russian PL mount 62.2mm f/1.2. It’s a prototype seeing as it uses rare light diffraction technology in the form of mirrored blades that rotate at about 10 000fps, inducing a special kind of optic current that sucks in the most light possible.

    Really good for night situations. It gives you about a 9 stop advantage. You could use a ND filter at f/32 at ISO 50 and still get a decent handheld night shot.

  • hmm.. light sucking tech. cool.
    Now that’s what we need, but as an attachment to put on the infinite number of ~3.5~5.6 zoom lenses available today.

    I’d think a well-exposed night shot at f/32 and ISO 50 would make it overexpose every possible shot during the day though.

Leave a Reply