Back in August, I mentioned that Canon was working on a whole line of f/1.2L prime lenses for the RF mount. So far we have the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM and the RF 85 f/1.2L USM, but there are more clues that more f/1.2L lenses are in the pipeline.
Canon News has uncovered the following optical designs for the RF mount.
Canon RF 18mm f/1.2L USM
- Focal length 18.51mm
- F-number 1.24
- half angle of view (degree) 49.45°
- Image height 21.64mm
- Total lens length 129.00mm
- BF 16.40mm
Canon RF 24mm f/1.2L USM
- focal length 24.59mm
- F-number 1.24
- half angle (in degrees) 41.35°
- Image height 21.64mm
- Total lens length 129.01mm
- BF 13.57mm
Canon RF 16mm f/1.4L USM
- Focal length 16.42mm
- F-number 1.43
- Half angle of view (degree) 52.80°
- Image height 21.64mm
- Lens total length 133.46mm
- BF 13.55mm
Also included in this latest patent, is a crazy fast wide angle prime lens design.
Canon RF 18mm f/1.0L USM
- Focal length 18.50mm
- F-number 1.03
- Half angle of view (degrees) 49.47°
- Image height 21.64mm
- Lens total length 150.00mm
- BF 4.99mm
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
but just the fact that they came up with a design for an 18mm F1.0 is pretty incredible.
Would be great if they can make some with a price that is somewhat affordable.
Seems to me like Canon wants to have camera system with truly leading low light performance. People mention all the time that they want an improvement in this regard, even though they sensor technology is basically as good as it will get in this regard. Faster glass, however, yields actual improvements.
If the RF mount enables these sort of speed demons, I'm all for it!
Why is a small BF tight? what is the BF measurement?
For one, these lenses are very wide so they don't need to be as big and heavy as the already existing 1.2 RF primes. And as I said, there already are big and heavy primes in the RF lineup, showing that Canon does not hesitate to release such lenses if they provide sufficient quality to make up for it.
imagine a 400 f2.0, i suspect its doable at a price £$