You can officially preorder all of the new Canon gear from our exclusive affiliate partner Adorama.

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.

Go to discussion...

Share.

11 comments

  1. Yes, that is the plan: get everyone hanging out there waiting for the pro R body to land and then offload truck loads of glass at the time of release into the market.
    Provided I need 2 bodies, a trinity of 2.8 zooms 28-70/2.0 including, 35/1.2(4), 85/1.2(4), 100 f whatever macro, 100-400 ( I keep my EF lens).... I am very likely up to US$15K out of pocket at the time of purchasing the kit.
  2. Yes, that is the plan: get everyone hanging out there waiting for the pro R body to land and then offload truck loads of glass at the time of release into the market.
    Provided I need 2 bodies, a trinity of 2.8 zooms 28-70/2.0 including, 35/1.2(4), 85/1.2(4), 100 f whatever macro, 100-400 ( I keep my EF lens).... I am very likely up to US$15K out of pocket at the time of purchasing the kit.

    I was very much planning to buy the EF 100-400, but with the size and weight of the RF 70-200, I'm thinking that plus the eventual 2x teleconverter might be the better buy... I mean, a 2.8 tele zoom for 1kg that's unobtrusive when collapsed? Yes please!
  3. crazy prices. give us a new body and we will consider upgrading our lenses.
    I'm waiting for a Mirrorless Pro body from Canon. If I go Canon Mirrorless I may go with Sigma lenses as the RFS are way too expensive. Hopefully they'll drop in time.
  4. I'm waiting for a Mirrorless Pro body from Canon. If I go Canon Mirrorless I may go with Sigma lenses as the RFS are way too expensive. Hopefully they'll drop in time.
    I will stick with Canon. the build quality is the best, I got an 18-35 sigma and it is falling apart and the AF kinda sucks.
  5. I will stick with Canon. the build quality is the best, I got an 18-35 sigma and it is falling apart and the AF kinda sucks.
    Sorry to hear about your sigma 18-35. Sigma seems to get really good reviews for a 3rd party mfr. My preference would always be Canon with Canon glass.
  6. Sorry to hear about your sigma 18-35. Sigma seems to get really good reviews for a 3rd party mfr. My preference would always be Canon with Canon glass.
    i work alot. i dont know if reviewers or other photogs get as much work as me.
  7. What you have described is quite typical for the first generation of Sigma Art lenses including Sigma 35 Art. lens mount gets loose and wobbly as an example. I have seen quite a few of these lenses with such a fault.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment