Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Canon Rumors – Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Media
    • Contact
    Canon Rumors – Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip
    Home»Canon Reviews»Review: Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro
    svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB2aWV3Qm94PScwIDAgNzI4IDQ2MicgeG1sbnM9J2h0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDAvc3ZnJz48L3N2Zz4= - Review: Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro

    Review: Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro

    By Canon RumorsDecember 17, 201821 Comments1 Min Read Canon Reviews
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The-Digital-Picture has completed their review of the brand new and affordable Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro lens for the EOS R system.

    As we should have expected, this $500 prime lens for the EOS R system is a great performer and provides great value. Especially if you want a native RF mount prime lens for your EOS R and don't want to spend $2300 on the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM.

    From The-Digital-Picture:

    Many acquire a mirrorless camera for smaller size and lighter weight while retaining great image quality and the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro Lens follows through with that spirit. This lens is light enough to be carried all day and the 35mm focal length has the general purpose utility to make it a good choice for such extended duration use. Especially with its macro focusing capabilities aiding, this lens has a huge number of subjects available for it. Image quality is quite good and 5-stop-rated image stabilization contributes strongly in that regard. That the price is low wraps up a great little package. Read the full review

    Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro in stock

    Go to discussion...

    EOS R review RF 35 f/1.8 IS STM Macro
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticlePatent: Possible soft focus EF to RF adapter
    Next Article The benefits of the large diameter of the EOS R’s RF mount explained

    Related Posts

    Canon lays out their corporate strategy

    March 11, 2023

    Save big on refurbished gear at the Canon USA Store for Cyber Monday

    November 28, 2022

    A new rumor suggest that the Canon EOS R will be replaced by a Canon EOS R8 [CR1]

    October 10, 2022

    Maven Filters launches the world’s first color coded photography and videography filters

    October 4, 2022

    Review: Canon RF 15-30mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

    September 13, 2022

    Canon EOS R6 Mark II already in prototype testing [CR1]

    August 31, 2022

    21 comments

    1. docsmith
      December 17, 2018 at 4:28 pm
      Looks like a great little lens.

      I had somewhat neglected considering it with the other lenses that were released. Ignoring the 0.5x "macro" part, this seems like an R version of the EF 35 f/2 IS, which is a great lens. Then throw in the 0.5x macro as a nice bonus.
      • Reply
      • 0
    2. Maximilian
      December 17, 2018 at 4:36 pm
      Looks like a great little lens.
      ...
      Ignoring the 0.5x "macro" part, this seems like an R version of the EF 35 f/2 IS, which is a great lens. Then throw in the 0.5x macro as a nice bonus.
      Same opinion here.
      If I was to go into EOS R, this little one, the 24-105 and the adapter had to be in my starter kit ;)
      (although I already have the EF 35 f/2 IS, which I would sell then)
      • Reply
      • 0
    3. josephandrews222
      December 17, 2018 at 4:47 pm
      An important paragraph (as far as image quality is concerned) from the review:

      "The very popular Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Lens, shown to the left above, seems to be the most relevant lens to compare. In the image quality comparison at f/2 (using discernment regarding the test camera resolution difference), these two lenses appear to be about the same. The RF lens shows slightly less flare and the EF lens shows slightly less distortion. Neither difference seems decision-making."

      I wasn't sure what to make of the reviewer's opinion of the focusing characteristics of the RF lens.
      • Reply
      • 0
    4. Random Orbits
      December 17, 2018 at 6:37 pm
      An important paragraph (as far as image quality is concerned) from the review:

      "The very popular Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Lens, shown to the left above, seems to be the most relevant lens to compare. In the image quality comparison at f/2 (using discernment regarding the test camera resolution difference), these two lenses appear to be about the same. The RF lens shows slightly less flare and the EF lens shows slightly less distortion. Neither difference seems decision-making."

      I wasn't sure what to make of the reviewer's opinion of the focusing characteristics of the RF lens.

      For single shot, I find the R to focus more accurately than my 5D4 when using AF points outside the central bank and the AF points extend further outward -- and this is true for adapted fast primes (24L II, 50L [both now sold]) as well as native RF lenses. The RF 35 is no different -- it focuses accurately.

      I actually swapped out the EF 35 f/2 IS for the RF 35 f/1.8 IS. Less expensive, similar IQ, higher max magnification, 1/3 stop faster and the overall package is smaller. I'm waiting for the R body that will replace my 5D4. The R is nice, but I still prefer the 5D4 for the larger lenses, higher frame rate while tracking, ergonomics.
      • Reply
      • 0
    5. SeanS
      December 17, 2018 at 6:41 pm
      I wasn't sure what to make of the reviewer's opinion of the focusing characteristics of the RF lens.

      Bryan spent 14 paragraphs on focusing and magnification, but I think the critical point was made in the second sentence:
      "The EOS R has been impressive in this regard, accurately focusing with everything I mount on it and the RF 35mm f/1.8mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro Lens is not an exception."

      Other points:
      • The focus ring is sometimes difficult to distinguish from the control ring, especially with gloves on.
      • There's a framing shift that occurs when changing focus directions.
      • The variable focus ring and linear focus ring sensitivity settings seem to produce the same results.
        Subjects change size moderately while focusing.
      • Focusing sounds may be picked up in video recordings, but focusing changes are smooth.
      If there was an aspect of focusing that needed more elaboration, please let us know.
      • Reply
      • 0
    6. countofmc95
      December 17, 2018 at 8:31 pm
      Interesting lens, like that it's small and cheap. I could basically shoot everything I want with just the 24-105 and this 35mm. Heck I could probably get by with just the 35mm. And then the adapter for if I want/need other focal lengths. That being said that package would be almost $4000, but would love to jump in if/when the price comes down.
      • Reply
      • 0
    7. Larsskv
      December 17, 2018 at 8:38 pm
      I've been using the RF 35 f1.8 during the weekend, and today I have done some comparisons to the 35LII, both mounted to the EOS R.

      My overall impression of the RF 35 is that it is very good indeed, and every EOS R owner who likes shooting primes should consider it. The small size and light weight is very compelling.

      After seeing the results I got this weekend, I did consider selling my 35LII, since I can see myself pick up the RF 35 much more often (due to size and weight). The images I got in indoors "family" situations, with kids playing around, was absolutely great. I think the rendering (depth perception) is very nice, and the bokeh is pleasing - I believe the bokeh of the RF 35 is significantly better than the 35 f2 IS I owned some years ago. Focusing was good, but considerably less fantastic than the RF 50L. I appreciate the close focusing abilities. It makes the lens more flexible in use. My real world impression after using this lens, was that I loved the pictures I got. They are plenty sharp, has a nice depth rendering, and bokeh is pleasing.

      After comparing the RF 35 to the 35LII, I can say the following:

      • The bokeh of the 35LII is considerably softer. I did some test pictures with the camera on a tripod, focused on a subject close by, and compared the bokeh in the background. I´d say the 35LII has 2/3 stops advantage bokeh wise. By that I mean that the 35LII is as soft at f2.5 as the RF 35 is at f2, and the difference seem to apply to the whole f1.8 to f4 range (that I compared).
      • When pixel peeping, it is no doubt that the 35LII is sharper at f1.4 than the RF 35 is at f1.8. But the RF 35 is very good at f1.8, all the way to the edges. By f.2.8 it is hard to tell the lenses apart sharpness wise, over the entire frame. The corners are sharp.
      • The RF35 has pretty bad coma at f1.8, but it is for all practical purposes gone at f2.8. The 35LII is much better in that regard.

      I didn´t really test for vignetting or chromatic aberration. I am not bothered much by either. The RF35 has noticeable vignetting at f1.8. I don't see much difference in vignetting between the f2.8 and f5.6 shots, so I guess it clears up pretty good by f2.8. I can't seem to find any chromatic aberration. If the RF35 has any, it shouldn't be a real world issue.

      One thing I haven't been able to make an opinion on yet, is the colors you get from this lens. Usually I find L lenses to be far better with color and clarity, than non L lenses. It is dark and bad natural light in Norway at this time of year, so I cannot tell you how vibrant (or not) the colors this lens produces, but I have no issues with the clarity.

      All things summarized. I think the RF35 is good enough that it might push me to sell of the 35LII. If it wasn't for the difference in bokeh performance, it would already be up for sale.
      • Reply
      • 0
    8. Maximilian
      December 17, 2018 at 9:11 pm
      ...
      All things summarized. I think the RF35 is good enough that it might push me to sell of the 35LII. If it wasn't for the difference in bokeh performance, it would already be up for sale.
      thanks, Lars, for sharing your impressions!

      For you it's a hard decission as you already own the 35LII. But for others it shows how good the RF 35 already is.

      For you I'd say wait some time until you decide if to sell the 35LII. Enjoy both lenses.
      • Reply
      • 0
    9. Larsskv
      December 17, 2018 at 9:52 pm
      thanks, Lars, for sharing your impressions!

      For you it's a hard decission as you already own the 35LII. But for others it shows how good the RF 35 already is.

      For you I'd say wait some time until you decide if to sell the 35LII. Enjoy both lenses.

      Selling great lenses is always a bit painful, but it helps if they finance a new one.
      • Reply
      • 0
    10. Yasko
      December 18, 2018 at 12:52 am
      500 $ „low“ price :oops:
      • Reply
      • 0
    11. jd7
      December 18, 2018 at 12:54 am
      I've been using the RF 35 f1.8 during the weekend, and today I have done some comparisons to the 35LII, both mounted to the EOS R.

      My overall impression of the RF 35 is that it is very good indeed, and every EOS R owner who likes shooting primes should consider it. The small size and light weight is very compelling.

      After seeing the results I got this weekend, I did consider selling my 35LII, since I can see myself pick up the RF 35 much more often (due to size and weight). The images I got in indoors "family" situations, with kids playing around, was absolutely great. I think the rendering (depth perception) is very nice, and the bokeh is pleasing - I believe the bokeh of the RF 35 is significantly better than the 35 f2 IS I owned some years ago. Focusing was good, but considerably less fantastic than the RF 50L. I appreciate the close focusing abilities. It makes the lens more flexible in use. My real world impression after using this lens, was that I loved the pictures I got. They are plenty sharp, has a nice depth rendering, and bokeh is pleasing.

      After comparing the RF 35 to the 35LII, I can say the following:

      • The bokeh of the 35LII is considerably softer. I did some test pictures with the camera on a tripod, focused on a subject close by, and compared the bokeh in the background. I´d say the 35LII has 2/3 stops advantage bokeh wise. By that I mean that the 35LII is as soft at f2.5 as the RF 35 is at f2, and the difference seem to apply to the whole f1.8 to f4 range (that I compared).
      • When pixel peeping, it is no doubt that the 35LII is sharper at f1.4 than the RF 35 is at f1.8. But the RF 35 is very good at f1.8, all the way to the edges. By f.2.8 it is hard to tell the lenses apart sharpness wise, over the entire frame. The corners are sharp.
      • The RF35 has pretty bad coma at f1.8, but it is for all practical purposes gone at f2.8. The 35LII is much better in that regard.

      I didn´t really test for vignetting or chromatic aberration. I am not bothered much by either. The RF35 has noticeable vignetting at f1.8. I don't see much difference in vignetting between the f2.8 and f5.6 shots, so I guess it clears up pretty good by f2.8. I can't seem to find any chromatic aberration. If the RF35 has any, it shouldn't be a real world issue.

      One thing I haven't been able to make an opinion on yet, is the colors you get from this lens. Usually I find L lenses to be far better with color and clarity, than non L lenses. It is dark and bad natural light in Norway at this time of year, so I cannot tell you how vibrant (or not) the colors this lens produces, but I have no issues with the clarity.

      All things summarized. I think the RF35 is good enough that it might push me to sell of the 35LII. If it wasn't for the difference in bokeh performance, it would already be up for sale.
      Interesting little review! Much more positive about the RF 35 than I would have expected after reading the TDP review ... At this point I'm certainly not convinced I'd be willing to trade my 35 Art for the RF 35, but I do like the idea of a small, light 35mm - and having IS would have its uses too of course - so we will see (assuming I end up with an RF mount camera at some stage!)
      • Reply
      • 0
    12. Larsskv
      December 18, 2018 at 9:12 am
      Interesting little review! Much more positive about the RF 35 than I would have expected after reading the TDP review ... At this point I'm certainly not convinced I'd be willing to trade my 35 Art for the RF 35, but I do like the idea of a small, light 35mm - and having IS would have it's uses too of course - so we will see (assuming I end up with an RF mount camera at some stage!)

      Unless you need f1.4, or if you need good wide open coma performance, I don’t think you would miss the 35ART for a second if you got the RF35. As far as I could tell from the sharpness comparison at TDP, the 35ART and RF35 seem to perform equally good.
      • Reply
      • 0
    13. jd7
      December 18, 2018 at 10:56 am
      Unless you need f1.4, or if you need good wide open coma performance, I don’t think you would miss the 35ART for a second if you got the RF35. As far as I could tell from the sharpness comparison at TDP, the 35ART and RF35 seem to perform equally good.
      Thanks Larsskv. I have to say I do like having f/1.4 at 35mm (and at 50mm), and I've recently tried a few nightscape shots (with my 35 Art, I mean) and the coma on RF 35 doesn't look good at all. Apart from that though, I just haven't seen any examples from the RF 35 (at least so far) which have blown me away, eg the bokeh hasn't impressed me (and I see bokeh is one of the reasons you are considering keeping your 35L II). While the RF 35 is clearly a very good lens, what I've seen so far makes me think it's very good in similar way to the EF 35 f/2 IS, ie very good for its size and weight, but the size and weight savings do cost something (apart from money!). Still, the fact you are considering letting go of the EF 35L II for the little RF 35 does make me think about it. I'll be keeping an eye on reviews and sample images as more become available.
      • Reply
      • 0
    14. Larsskv
      December 18, 2018 at 12:18 pm
      Thanks Larsskv. I have to say I do like having f/1.4 at 35mm (and at 50mm), and I've recently tried a few nightscape shots and the coma on RF 35 doesn't look good at all. Apart from that though, I just haven't seen any examples from the RF 35 (at least so far) which have blown me away, eg the bokeh hasn't impressed me (and I see bokeh is one of the reasons you are considering keeping your 35L II). While the RF 35 is clearly a very good lens, what I've seen so far makes me think it's very good in similar way to the EF 35 f/2 IS, ie very good for its size and weight, but the size and weight savings do cost something (beyond just costing more money!). Still, the fact you are considering letting go of the EF 35L II for the little RF 35 does make me think about it. I'll be keeping an eye on reviews and sample images as more become available.

      I have to admit, the coma on this lens at f1.8 is among the worst I’ve seen. Probably on par with the 24LII. I don’t use it for astro, so it doesn’t really matter to me.

      With regards to the bokeh, I think it is good, but it is far from as soft as the 35LII.

      The problem I have with finding photos is that they rarely have a meaningful resolution. Further, especially with wide angle lenses, the subjects are often too far away, not filling the frame properly. This makes it hard to tell how the lens will do for your (my) own needs, as I always try to get fairly close when shooting wide angles.
      • Reply
      • 0
    15. jd7
      December 18, 2018 at 1:00 pm
      The problem I have with finding photos is that they rarely have a meaningful resolution. Further, especially with wide angle lenses, the subjects are often too far away, not filling the frame properly. This makes it hard to tell how the lens will do for your (my) own needs, as I always try to get fairly close when shooting wide angles.
      I agree it's hard to tell too much from images you find online - which is why I'm interested in the thoughts of someone like you who has access to the gear! :) And of course if I can possibly get some hands on time with a lens (or any piece of gear really) before buying, I would always take that opportunity.
      • Reply
      • 0
    16. LSXPhotog
      December 18, 2018 at 2:01 pm
      I don't have much positive to say after walking away from my time with this lens. I don't think it's a good general use prime and feel that it really only performs well when focusing on closer subjects. It would be great for food photography and detail shots. Focusing at mid range subjects turns in some very busy images and ugly bokeh transitions.

      https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/i...-macro-the-ugly-bokeh-king.36469/#post-756517
      • Reply
      • 0
    17. JoFT
      December 18, 2018 at 5:15 pm
      I've been using the RF 35 f1.8 during the weekend, and today I have done some comparisons to the 35LII, both mounted to the EOS R.

      My overall impression of the RF 35 is that it is very good indeed, and every EOS R owner who likes shooting primes should consider it. The small size and light weight is very compelling.

      After seeing the results I got this weekend, I did consider selling my 35LII, since I can see myself pick up the RF 35 much more often (due to size and weight). The images I got in indoors "family" situations, with kids playing around, was absolutely great. I think the rendering (depth perception) is very nice, and the bokeh is pleasing - I believe the bokeh of the RF 35 is significantly better than the 35 f2 IS I owned some years ago. Focusing was good, but considerably less fantastic than the RF 50L. I appreciate the close focusing abilities. It makes the lens more flexible in use. My real world impression after using this lens, was that I loved the pictures I got. They are plenty sharp, has a nice depth rendering, and bokeh is pleasing.

      After comparing the RF 35 to the 35LII, I can say the following:

      • The bokeh of the 35LII is considerably softer. I did some test pictures with the camera on a tripod, focused on a subject close by, and compared the bokeh in the background. I´d say the 35LII has 2/3 stops advantage bokeh wise. By that I mean that the 35LII is as soft at f2.5 as the RF 35 is at f2, and the difference seem to apply to the whole f1.8 to f4 range (that I compared).
      • When pixel peeping, it is no doubt that the 35LII is sharper at f1.4 than the RF 35 is at f1.8. But the RF 35 is very good at f1.8, all the way to the edges. By f.2.8 it is hard to tell the lenses apart sharpness wise, over the entire frame. The corners are sharp.
      • The RF35 has pretty bad coma at f1.8, but it is for all practical purposes gone at f2.8. The 35LII is much better in that regard.

      I didn´t really test for vignetting or chromatic aberration. I am not bothered much by either. The RF35 has noticeable vignetting at f1.8. I don't see much difference in vignetting between the f2.8 and f5.6 shots, so I guess it clears up pretty good by f2.8. I can't seem to find any chromatic aberration. If the RF35 has any, it shouldn't be a real world issue.

      One thing I haven't been able to make an opinion on yet, is the colors you get from this lens. Usually I find L lenses to be far better with color and clarity, than non L lenses. It is dark and bad natural light in Norway at this time of year, so I cannot tell you how vibrant (or not) the colors this lens produces, but I have no issues with the clarity.

      All things summarized. I think the RF35 is good enough that it might push me to sell of the 35LII. If it wasn't for the difference in bokeh performance, it would already be up for sale.

      And please compare color rendering... For me the colorendering of the 35LII is implessive....

      If you have the R, the RF35 is a lens to have!!!
      • Reply
      • 0
    18. JoFT
      December 18, 2018 at 5:21 pm
      I took mine on a trip to Asia. The < 1kg package is impressive. And the results as well.

      I made only a few shots in comparison to the 35LII: You get what you pay for but do I want to carry it?

      For traveling: definitely an amazing package. I do hope Canon comes up with a similar performing 85mm f1.8 in a similar form factor....
      • Reply
      • 0
    19. Larsskv
      December 18, 2018 at 6:23 pm
      And please compare color rendering... For me the colorendering of the 35LII is implessive....

      If you have the R, the RF35 is a lens to have!!!

      Quality light is lacking at this time of year, so I am afraid I wount be able to make a good comparison for quite some time...
      • Reply
      • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    • Next »

    Leave a comment

    Please log in to your forum account to comment

    • Facebook 105K
    • Twitter 65.7K

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Get the latest news to your inbox

    Resources

    Third-party lenses for the Canon RF mount

    January 19, 2021

    Canon RF lens roadmap

    November 9, 2020
    Latest Announcements

    Canon announces EOS Webcam Utility Pro subscription service

    November 9, 2022

    Preorder: Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Canon RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM & Canon Speedlite EL-5

    November 1, 2022

    Canon officially announces the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Canon RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM and Canon Speedlite EL-5

    November 1, 2022

    Venus Optics officially announces the Laowa Argus RF 25mm f/0.95 for APS-C

    October 25, 2022
    Latest Reviews

    Review: Canon RF 15-30mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

    September 13, 2022

    Review: Canon RF-S 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

    July 20, 2022

    Review: Canon RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM

    July 20, 2022

    OpticalLimits reviews the Canon EOS RF 16mm F2.8 STM

    February 21, 2022
    Canon EOS R1 Rumor Round-up

    Canon EOS R5 Mark II to arrive before EOS R1? [CR2]

    February 20, 2023331

    There have been some rumblings about a follow-up to the brilliant Canon EOS R5, and…

    The Canon EOS R1 may not come until 2024

    November 10, 2022

    We haven’t forgotten about the Canon EOS R1, and you probably haven’t either [CR2]

    September 22, 2022
    Canon EOS R5 S Rumor Round-up

    EOS R camera between EOS R7 and EOS R10 coming [CR3]

    November 28, 202292

    It feels like the old days again, as numerous camera rumors continue to flow in.…

    Canon is gearing up to finally release a high megapixel camera with 100+ megapixels [CR3]

    May 26, 2022

    A high megapixel camera is coming [CR2]

    February 21, 2022
    Canon EOS R50/R100 Rumor Round-up

    Canon celebrates 20th consecutive year of No. 1 share of global interchangeable-lens digital camera market

    March 28, 202325

    TOKYO, March 28, 2023—Canon Inc. announced today that the company’s interchangeable-lens digital cameras (digital SLR…

    Stock Notice: Canon EOS R50 Body & Kits at B&H Photo

    March 16, 2023

    After almost 30 years, Canon is ending the “Kiss” branding in Japan

    February 9, 2023
    Facebook Twitter RSS Discord
    © 2023 Canon Rumors hosting is fully managed by Host Duplex | Design & community services from Audentio

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.