Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Canon Rumors – Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Media
    • Contact
    Canon Rumors – Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip
    Home»Canon Reviews»Review: The stellar Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM
    svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB2aWV3Qm94PScwIDAgNzI4IDQ2MicgeG1sbnM9J2h0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDAvc3ZnJz48L3N2Zz4= - Review: The stellar Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

    Review: The stellar Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

    By Canon RumorsDecember 5, 2018Updated:December 5, 201845 Comments2 Mins Read Canon Reviews
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    OpticalLimits has completed their review of what appears to be the best 50mm lens that Canon has ever produced, the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM.

    I've been using the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM for a couple of weeks now and I am extremely impressed by it. 50mm isn't my focal length of choice, but the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM is forcing me to get used to it because it's so good.

    From OpticalLimits:

    Let's start with a disclaimer: Any verdict has to be very preliminary at this stage – it's our first review using the EOS R after all. Also, keep in mind that the 30-megapixel sensor is rather average in terms of resolution today.

    That all being said, it is quite obvious that the Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L is an awesome lens … with a similar awe-inspiring price tag. In relation to other lenses in this class, the performance is already superb at f/1.2. Yes, the outer image region is not truly stellar but it's impressive nonetheless. The image quality is extreme at medium aperture settings – across the image frame that is. Low lateral CAs contribute to the very high image quality perception. Image distortions are generally no issue. Vignetting is though – at least in its uncorrected state. There is some heavy light-falloff at f/1.2 and f/1.6 but to be fair – that's to be expected. Most users will not (should not?) buy the lens for its sharpness but for its shallow depth-of-field capabilities. While not truly exceptional, the bokeh is very good with a smooth rendition in the focus transition zone. Out-of-focus highlights are nicely rendered in the image center, less so towards the image corners.  Read the full review

    Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L at our exclusive affiliate partner Adorama

    Go to discussion...

    EOS R review RF 50 f/1.2L
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCanon to showcase 8K products at NAB 2019, and bring 8K plans into clearer focus
    Next Article We’ve added a dark theme to canonrumors.com

    Related Posts

    Canon lays out their corporate strategy

    March 11, 2023

    Save big on refurbished gear at the Canon USA Store for Cyber Monday

    November 28, 2022

    Canon USA restocks refurbished gear, now includes EOS R5 and EOS R6 with 10% discount

    November 11, 2022

    Hot Deal: Save 10% off refurbished gear at the Canon USA store

    October 28, 2022

    A new rumor suggest that the Canon EOS R will be replaced by a Canon EOS R8 [CR1]

    October 10, 2022

    Maven Filters launches the world’s first color coded photography and videography filters

    October 4, 2022

    45 comments

    1. Mt Spokane Photography
      December 4, 2018 at 7:19 pm
      Every review I've read is gushing praises for this lens. DPR is using it for their tests of the R, and it will likely be the standard until a 85mm 1.4 or 1.2 RF lens comes out.

      I do not generally use 50mm, or I'd find a way to get this lens. I also have a 5D MK IV, so I use EF lenses because they work on both cameras.
      • Reply
      • 0
    2. Don Haines
      December 4, 2018 at 10:18 pm
      Every EF lens out there fits onto the R (with an adapter), so it makes sense to me that they are starting off with lenses that beat EF significantly. Why just make more of the same old thing?
      • Reply
      • 0
    3. Larsskv
      December 4, 2018 at 10:26 pm
      I’ve had the RF 50L for two weeks now. I am very impressed and satisfied with it. It has the sharpness of the 35LII and the rendering and bokeh of the 50L and 85LII. AF is extremely accurate, even with my daughter moving around fast and unpredictably. If I needed to, I would choose this lens over my 35LII, 50L (which I have already sold) and 85LII. I cannot recommend this lens enough.
      • Reply
      • 0
    4. Jethro
      December 4, 2018 at 11:26 pm
      They say it 'eats up' the 30MP sensor, so I guess we'll have to wait for a higher MP version of the EOS R to really test it. Otherwise, for those with deep pockets, it looks great.
      • Reply
      • 0
    5. Ozarker
      December 5, 2018 at 4:09 am
      Wish I had the deep pockets for the lens, but I'd wait on the body for now.
      • Reply
      • 0
    6. ethanz
      December 5, 2018 at 5:08 am
      The GAS just won't go away.
      • Reply
      • 0
    7. Del Paso
      December 5, 2018 at 8:16 am
      Really really bad news for me: I wanted to have it, now I MUST have it with a second EOS R high resolution body.
      Got to sell my wife's car, my son's downhill bikes or rob a bank. Life is getting hard for fanboys...
      But it seems Canon made the right (lens) choices!
      • Reply
      • 0
    8. ethanz
      December 5, 2018 at 4:07 pm
      Really really bad news for me: I wanted to have it, now I MUST have it with a second EOS R high resolution body.
      Got to sell my wife's car, my son's downhill bikes or rob a bank. Life is getting hard for fanboys...
      But it seems Canon made the right (lens) choices!

      We could rob a bank together.
      • Reply
      • 0
    9. Viggo
      December 5, 2018 at 4:23 pm
      I can just nod along with this, it’s truly stellar and it instantly became one of my top three all stars, knocking the 35 L II down to forth and pushing the Zeiss 100 f2 to third place, it’s only bested for me by the 200 f2.0 for image quality only.

      Canon stepped it up for reals....

      If I could own only one lens forever it is no question...
      • Reply
      • 0
    10. LSXPhotog
      December 5, 2018 at 5:41 pm
      From a sharpness standpoint, the lens is truly magnificent - I expected this and am still impressed.

      50mm is my most commonly used prime focal length as a walk around and detail lens. But I can't get on board the "bokeh train" when it comes to this lens. I'm really on the fence. I see images where the background melts away and then I see images where it's a busy, distracting mess with football bokeh balls everywhere. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be happening a lot in sample images and it's honestly not something I have with my 50mm Art.

      The Sigma is a great lens, but it's my only non-Canon glass I have, and that bothers me from a weather sealing and professional service standpoint. Sigma repairs are well communicated, but slow and they don't offer a loaner program at this time. I want to want this lens - if that makes sense....but I really need to rent one and decide if it will work for me and I need to experience just how bad the bokeh is. Because right now I'm not really seeing the insanely beautiful bokeh the 50mm f/1.2 was previously known for. This is almost like a Canon "Helios 44-2" 50mm f/1.2! haha

      Again, just my opinion based purely from samples online. I plan to rent this lens and get a better feel for it.
      • Reply
      • 0
    11. Berowne
      December 5, 2018 at 5:54 pm
      We could rob a bank together.
      Let me be the third.
      • Reply
      • 0
    12. Etienne
      December 5, 2018 at 6:14 pm
      It's too big, too heavy, too expensive, and no IS.
      I'm hoping that they will release an everyday, reasonably priced RF 50 f/1.4 IS. That would probably push me into the RF world.
      • Reply
      • 0
    13. Del Paso
      December 5, 2018 at 7:03 pm
      It's too big, too heavy, too expensive, and no IS.
      I'm hoping that they will release an everyday, reasonably priced RF 50 f/1.4 IS. That would probably push me into the RF world.
      Quality comes at a price
      Too big? Look at the 1,4 (only)Sigma.
      Too heavy? Look at the 1,4/85 Sigma.
      Too expensive? What about the Leica M 1,25/75mm (GAAAASP!)
      There is certainly a huge market for a lighter and less expensive RF 1,4/50, but I'm convinced, the 1,2/50 is a very interesting offer, and worth its price.
      • Reply
      • 0
    14. twoheadedboy
      December 5, 2018 at 7:31 pm
      Quality comes at a price
      Too big? Look at the 1,4 (only)Sigma.
      Too heavy? Look at the 1,4/85 Sigma.
      Too expensive? What about the Leica M 1,25/75mm (GAAAASP!)
      There is certainly a huge market for a lighter and less expensive RF 1,4/50, but I'm convinced, the 1,2/50 is a very interesting offer, and worth its price.

      I agree though. I own it because it's awesome. If they follow up with a great f/1.4 IS I'm going to for sure trade this in for that. If I was putting together a studio this would be the first lens I bought though, my god is it huge for a 50 prime though.
      • Reply
      • 0
    15. RGF
      December 5, 2018 at 7:35 pm
      another technology wonder piece. Not useful me (wild life shooter) but nice to see what canon can do ..
      • Reply
      • 0
    16. Larsskv
      December 5, 2018 at 8:25 pm
      From a sharpness standpoint, the lens is truly magnificent - I expected this and am still impressed.

      50mm is my most commonly used prime focal length as a walk around and detail lens. But I can't get on board the "bokeh train" when it comes to this lens. I'm really on the fence. I see images where the background melts away and then I see images where it's a busy, distracting mess with football bokeh balls everywhere. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be happening a lot in sample images and it's honestly not something I have with my 50mm Art.

      The Sigma is a great lens, but it's my only non-Canon glass I have, and that bothers me from a weather sealing and professional service standpoint. Sigma repairs are well communicated, but slow and they don't offer a loaner program at this time. I want to want this lens - if that makes sense....but I really need to rent one and decide if it will work for me and I need to experience just how bad the bokeh is. Because right now I'm not really seeing the insanely beautiful bokeh the 50mm f/1.2 was previously known for. This is almost like a Canon "Helios 44-2" 50mm f/1.2! haha

      Again, just my opinion based purely from samples online. I plan to rent this lens and get a better feel for it.
      I think you will be satisfied with the bokeh once you try it. I’ve never had better bokeh with a 50mm lens, and I have tried most of the available options for the EF mount.
      • Reply
      • 0
    17. jd7
      December 5, 2018 at 8:37 pm
      From a sharpness standpoint, the lens is truly magnificent - I expected this and am still impressed.

      50mm is my most commonly used prime focal length as a walk around and detail lens. But I can't get on board the "bokeh train" when it comes to this lens. I'm really on the fence. I see images where the background melts away and then I see images where it's a busy, distracting mess with football bokeh balls everywhere. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be happening a lot in sample images and it's honestly not something I have with my 50mm Art.

      The Sigma is a great lens, but it's my only non-Canon glass I have, and that bothers me from a weather sealing and professional service standpoint. Sigma repairs are well communicated, but slow and they don't offer a loaner program at this time. I want to want this lens - if that makes sense....but I really need to rent one and decide if it will work for me and I need to experience just how bad the bokeh is. Because right now I'm not really seeing the insanely beautiful bokeh the 50mm f/1.2 was previously known for. This is almost like a Canon "Helios 44-2" 50mm f/1.2! haha

      Again, just my opinion based purely from samples online. I plan to rent this lens and get a better feel for it.
      I agree with you about the bokeh from the RF 50L. It’s obviously a sharp lens even at f/1.2 but I’m yet to be convinced about the overall rendering given the price/size/weight. I'm not saying it's bad of course, but I'm just not seeing anything which makes me think it is fantastic. To be honest, even if I had an R, I wouldn’t have any burning desire to get the RF 50L based on what I’ve seen so far (especially given price, I think I'd lean towards the Sigma 50 Art or EF 50 f/1.2L). I noticed the Optical Limits review rated the bokeh as decent but not fantastic, as impressed as they were with the lens in most other respects.
      • Reply
      • 0
    18. Viggo
      December 5, 2018 at 8:53 pm
      Here’s a quick shot at 1.2, very close background and I really like the pop, a different world than what I got with the Sigma. And I love the super smooth background, but as with EVERY lens you can get poor bokeh.
      • Reply
      • 0
    19. Del Paso
      December 5, 2018 at 10:07 pm
      Here’s a quick shot at 1.2, very close background and I really like the pop, a different world than what I got with the Sigma. And I love the super smooth background, but as with EVERY lens you can get poor bokeh.
      Your picture shows some of the best bokeh I can think of, wonder what can be criticized about it ?????
      Very nice pict!
      • Reply
      • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • Next »

    Leave a comment

    Please log in to your forum account to comment

    • Facebook 105K
    • Twitter 65.7K

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Get the latest news to your inbox

    Resources

    Third-party lenses for the Canon RF mount

    January 19, 2021

    Canon RF lens roadmap

    November 9, 2020
    Latest Announcements

    Canon announces EOS Webcam Utility Pro subscription service

    November 9, 2022

    Preorder: Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Canon RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM & Canon Speedlite EL-5

    November 1, 2022

    Canon officially announces the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Canon RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM and Canon Speedlite EL-5

    November 1, 2022

    Venus Optics officially announces the Laowa Argus RF 25mm f/0.95 for APS-C

    October 25, 2022
    Latest Reviews

    Review: Canon RF 15-30mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

    September 13, 2022

    Review: Canon RF-S 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

    July 20, 2022

    Review: Canon RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM

    July 20, 2022

    OpticalLimits reviews the Canon EOS RF 16mm F2.8 STM

    February 21, 2022
    Canon EOS R1 Rumor Round-up

    Canon EOS R5 Mark II to arrive before EOS R1? [CR2]

    February 20, 2023331

    There have been some rumblings about a follow-up to the brilliant Canon EOS R5, and…

    The Canon EOS R1 may not come until 2024

    November 10, 2022

    We haven’t forgotten about the Canon EOS R1, and you probably haven’t either [CR2]

    September 22, 2022
    Canon EOS R5 S Rumor Round-up

    EOS R camera between EOS R7 and EOS R10 coming [CR3]

    November 28, 202292

    It feels like the old days again, as numerous camera rumors continue to flow in.…

    Canon is gearing up to finally release a high megapixel camera with 100+ megapixels [CR3]

    May 26, 2022

    A high megapixel camera is coming [CR2]

    February 21, 2022
    Canon EOS R50/R100 Rumor Round-up

    Canon celebrates 20th consecutive year of No. 1 share of global interchangeable-lens digital camera market

    March 28, 202326

    TOKYO, March 28, 2023—Canon Inc. announced today that the company’s interchangeable-lens digital cameras (digital SLR…

    Stock Notice: Canon EOS R50 Body & Kits at B&H Photo

    March 16, 2023

    After almost 30 years, Canon is ending the “Kiss” branding in Japan

    February 9, 2023
    Facebook Twitter RSS Discord
    © 2023 Canon Rumors hosting is fully managed by Host Duplex | Design & community services from Audentio

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.