SigZilla Field Test
This is a field test from the Juza Nature Photography web site. It's definitely funny and cool at the same time.
Juza Conclusion
“Overall, the image quality is of Sigma 200-500 f/2.8 is good for such an extreme lens, even though it is far from easy to get the best from this lens: at f/2.8 the depth of field is very shallow, and the focus must be perfect…even an error of few centimeters may make the difference between a sharp photo and an out of focus photos.”
Read More: http://www.juzaphoto.com/…
cr
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
20 Comments
IS/VR/OS would drain camera batteries in a heart beat. It’d probably need a car battery a even heavier motors. I think it would be far simpler to get a camera with built in IS instead…or a tripod…
the model is such a cutie i just fell in love
Women are a main ingredient of Nature. :-)
I don’t know if this is practical for in-lens stabilization optics, but if they could put it in the very rear right before the camera it wouldn’t need to be very big or power-hungry at all.
As Luke said in the first reply, this lens is not for fashion/portrait photography. It would’ve been better if the test had been conducted using a more appropriate subject.
Not that I’m complaining about the subject mind! ;)