For more page-turning fun, you can now download the manual for the Canon EOS R6. The manual is available here.
- Canon EOS R6 Body $2499
- Canon EOS R6 w/24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM $2799
- Canon EOS R6 w/24-105mm f/4L IS USM $3599
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
I'm poor.
One question I had...I thought this had a 12FPS mode and a 20FPS mode, but I didn't see anything about 20FPS in the manual. Was I confusing it with the R5?
It has been fully used from how it looks and when I test the shutter count with ML, it already clocked 860k+ ! What a badass workhorse! It has better high ISO performance then modern Canon 24MP sensors.
7D series are truly a toughened workhorse. Get one if you can find it cheap. Canon's shutter life is crazy good.
Studio shot comparison: Digital Photography Review
As for weather sealing, I don't like taking pictures in the rain. And I have too little time to go on long nature hikes and trips. Most of my lenses are weather sealed, so that pretty much covers my needs. Top LCD? Again, I can't think of many scenarios where I really need one. Sure, a few where the camera is lower down, near the ground, perhaps in bright light, but, really, with the tilt screen on the back, that won't be any big deal either. In fact, most of the time I use a tripod, the camera is ABOVE eye-level, where the LCD won't help. I'm hand holding an events camera 85% of the time, and in such a case I just look at the back screen to change settings in preparation for a new shooting scenario.
Another point about the weather sealing: In my experience, dropping a camera or, worse, having it stolen, presents more of a risk than weather conditions. But that is because of what I said above: I just don't like shooting in bad weather. Plus, in our hot and humid conditions, weather sealing does not prevent being careless in such a way as to allow mold/fungus to form in a lens. That said, I think the weather sealing on this is as good or better than the R and 80D, both of which have been fine.
Time to curl up with a good manual!
I too have found the shutters to be quite resilient. The stated shutter life spec is not an actual mean failure rate, but rather a bit of an arbitrary setting of expectations. In point of fact, the shutters that go can go at 40,000 or 40 shots. There is higher likelihood of wear at the mid-to-high six figures shutter counts. My 7D2 went for 750k shots. No doubt, someone still has it somewhere out there, firing away.
When people query me when I sell a camera, they always ask for the shutter count, and I find it so odd that one that is 5,000 is seemingly valued much more than one with a 30,000 shutter count. I've played this in the market by buying used cameras (I try to buy all used, when possible) at high shutter counts to be cost efficient. The 1DX's I've owned were almost all >200,000 clicks by the time I owned them, and I probably broke even after reselling.
The Sony bodies I just sold were generally used with electronic shutter, so the shutter counts were extremely low. This will likely become more the norm as readout speeds increase, negating much of the benefit of a mechanical shutter.
I wonder how the OLED wear holds up over the years, that may or may not be a more relevant point of failure for those mirrorless cameras.
Here you go, something other than my experience (but people looks more at "test" so) ...and high ISO noise performance is not equivalent to DR. DR and noise is unrelated. I have in the past shot with all those bodies in comparison and yes, it's the same in real world too. Is it a concern? No, that difference doesn't matter s*** in real world. It's just a "number" fo the sake of it.
I simply saw a statement that seemed wrong to me (7D beating the 24 MP sensor) and supplied some evidence for why I believe so. And sure, I accompanied that with a pretty short comment that left a lot up for interpretation. But we've had a good share of people equating lower resolutions to better low light performance (a phenomenon only observed when making a flawed comparison of different magnifications) and I projected that to you. So sorry.
Dynamic range in modern cameras is almost exclusively limited by noise. DR depends on Well capacity of the individual pixels and the noise floor (basically, how far you can raise shadows before noise drowns out details to an unacceptable degree). The amount of noise added to an image by the electronics is both responsible for a loss in DR and the difference in noise we see in those high ISO shots I linked to.
I'd seriously like to warm my hands, so wondering what's up.
On the other hand, it seems willing to let me record ALL-I, 59.94p in 4K, which the manual says it shouldn't do without a CF-E card.
Could 59.94 be played back at lower speed for a sort of poor-man's slo mo (at half speed rather than quarter speed as 120 would do--I don't have access to that either, no CF-E card) or will playback just automatically run at 59.94p?
EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM
EF70-200mm f/4L IS USM
EF70-200mm f/4L IS II USM
Will there be a firmware upgrade? I can afford the EF-RF adapter for what I shoot, but not the RF version of the 70-200..
No, I wasn't offended, sorry if it sounded like one as I am not strong in English.
I agree with you, and thanks for being considerate with your response.