Anhui China, Jul 19, 2022 – Venus Optics announces the launch of the new Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie Lens for APS-C mirrorless cameras. It is one of the world’s widest rectilinear pancake lenses for APS-C cameras. At a cookie size of 25mm(0.98”) long and weighing only 130g(0.29lbs), it literally can be put in your pocket. Most of the wide-angle pancake lenses on the market are either fisheye or pinhole. They usually have obvious barrel distortion and inferior image quality. However, this new Laowa Cookie Lens is equipped with a high-performance optical design, featuring super-low distortion and optimized image quality to ensure users take full advantage of the mirrorless system – compact and capable. Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is a fun and mighty option for day-to-day content creators to carry around without burden, ideal for street, urban, landscape photography and everyday snapshots. The Lens has black and silver versions for multiple mounts including Canon RF, Nikon Z, Sony E, L mount and Fuji X to match with the camera body.

word image 48787 2 - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors Key Features:
  • Extremely Compact and Lightweight
  • World’s Widest Rectilinear Pancake for APS-C
  • Super-low Distortion
  • High Optical Performance
  • Stunning 10-Point Sunstar
  • Close Minimum Focusing Distance
  • Built-in Filter Thread

Extremely Compact and Lightweight

Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is a pancake-style lens specifically designed for APS-C mirrorless cameras. At just 25mm deep and weighing only 130g, you can use it with gimbals and shoot handheld easily. It’s almost like a body cap with function. With such discreet design and excellent portability, you will carry it anywhere and eventually shoot more.

World’s Widest Rectilinear Pancake

Featuring a remarkable 109.3° angle of view, Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is by far the world’s widest rectilinear pancake lens for APS-C on the market. With the advantages of the ultra-wide perspective and pocket-sized weight, this lens brings you a burdenless experience to capture epic moments in everyday life and explore the beauty in our surroundings.

Super-low Distortion

Most pancake lenses with a wide perspective are fisheye so heavy Barrel distortion would be expected. However, the Laowa Cookie is here to break the norm. The lens has excellent control of optical distortion. The horizontal and vertical straight lines are retained from corner to corner. As an ultra-wide-angle lens, this is essential not only to reduce the post-editing time but also to expand the possibility of genres you can do with this lens, from street and outdoor photography to shape-edged architectures and spectacular landscapes.

graphical user interface description automaticall - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Thomas John

High Optical Performance

a picture containing snow tree outdoor covered - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Dylan Goldby

Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie lens comes with 12 elements in 8 groups optical structure with 2 aspherical and 4 extra-low dispersion elements. Despite the light and compact design, the lens managed to deliver the impressive image quality and high contrast. The performance of chromatic aberration, flaring, and ghosting effects are optimized to support your day and night snapshots.

word image 48787 10 - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Dylan Goldby

Stunning 10-point Sunstar

Built with 5 aperture blades, stunning 10-point Sunstar can be achieved easily when stop down.

a picture containing sky outdoor track building - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Richard Wong
a bridge over water with buildings on either side - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Thomas John

Close Minimum Focusing Distance

The minimum focusing distance of Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is 10cm, allowing you to get super close to the subjects and create interesting wide-angle macro-like shots with nice separation between the object and background.

a lizard on a log description automatically gener - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© John Hanson
a picture containing water outdoor sky nature - Venus Optics announces the Laowa RF 10mm f/4 'Cookie' lens for APS-C sensors
© Jimmy Chan

Built-in Filter Thread

Equipped with a 37mm filter thread for you to use screw-in filters directly. It is very convenient and cost-saving as no additional filter holder is required.

Pricing & Availability

Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is currently available to purchase via Venus Optics official website (http://www.venuslens.net/) and authorized resellers.

The US price for Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie is USD299 for all mounts. Pricing varies in different countries.

Product Page

Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie: https://www.venuslens.net/product/laowa-10mm-f-4-cookie/

Laowa 10mm f/4 Cookie
Focal length 10mm
Aperture range f/4-22
Angle of view 109.3°
Format APS-C
Lens structure 12 elements in 8 groups
(4 ED elements)
Aperture blades 5 blades
Maximum magnification 0.15x
Minimum focusing distance 100mm
Focus Method Manual (MF)
Dimensions for Filter Thread Ø 37mm
Dimensions About Ø 59.8mm (2.35”) * 25mm (0.98”)
Weight About 130g (0.29lbs)
Mount Black & Silver version for all mounts:
Canon RF / Nikon Z / Sony E / L mount / Fuji X
Price $299

 

 

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.

Go to discussion...

Share.

11 comments

  1. With the depth of field of that short focal length and f/4, it’s not much of a problem.
    I have the laowa 16mm at f/4 and I still see the difference on people's eyes. Try to shoot a video at f/4 in tight space, such as inside a car, say 3/4 body, focus to the person's eye and you will see why you would need autofocus when he moves his head back and forth while singing.
  2. I have the laowa 16mm at f/4 and I still see the difference on people's eyes. Try to shoot a video at f/4 in tight space, such as inside a car, say 3/4 body, focus to the person's eye and you will see why you would need autofocus when he moves his head back and forth while singing.
    Sure, if you regularly shoot videos inside cars and focussing on eyes, it’s not the lens for you. I wouldn’t buy a manual focus lens for birds in flight either. But, most people use ultra wide angle lenses where setting focus to infinity or a hyperfocal distance or closer is more than adequate.
  3. Sure, if you regularly shoot videos inside cars and focussing on eyes, it’s not the lens for you. I wouldn’t buy a manual focus lens for birds in flight either. But, most people use ultra wide angle lenses where setting focus to infinity or a hyperfocal distance or closer is more than adequate.
    Yes, it's a one trick pony.

    I personally find these lenses a gimmick for hipsters. I used to have the EF14mm with broken AF out of warranty and used it a lot on hyperfocal, but there is so much more you can do with an ultra wide lens, and autofocus is very handy. For my eyes, it is paramount.
  4. Yes, it's a one trick pony.

    I personally find these lenses a gimmick for hipsters. I used to have the EF14mm with broken AF out of warranty and used it a lot on hyperfocal, but there is so much more you can do with an ultra wide lens, and autofocus is very handy. For my eyes, it is paramount.
    People complain about everything. This lens is cheap and gives beautiful absolutely rectilinear images which is great for a pancake lens you can slip into your pocket and take with you on vacation or for more serious work, but it won't of course do everything. The RF 16mm f/2.8 has really great AF, is dirt cheap, very sharp in the centre but requires serious digital correction for distortion, and so the optics is derided by others. It's said "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good". But, the perfect is the enemy on forums. Sure, buy an expensive and possibly huge lens that will do everything, and, for some, such lenses are essential. But, far more people will buy and be very happy with these cheaper offerings that are good but not perfect.
  5. One trick pony??? An UW 16mm lens is popular for landscape, nature, gardens, interior, architecture, real estate, and general outdoor photography, the kind of things that don't move, where shots can be carefully framed and set up, and in those situations manual focus is not an impediment.

    This ultrawide focal length is not good for close up portraits/headshots as the perspective will be unnatural and distorted, it does work though when using a distant view of the subject.

    If you want photos like the one shown below, where the nose is enlarged and the face is stretched thin, then just use a smartphone and get the same funky distortion, like all the smartphone users who don't quite understand focal length distortion and shoot portraits really close with an UW! (PS - in case of any confusion, the image on the right is closer to how the subject really looks!) :oops:

    1658328458579.png

    From https://annawu.com/blog/2011/09/focal-length-comparison/
  6. One trick pony??? An UW 16mm lens is popular for landscape, nature, gardens, interior, architecture, real estate, and general outdoor photography, the kind of things that don't move, where shots can be carefully framed and set up, and in those situations manual focus is not an impediment.
    Don 't you love it when people stick to what they know and treat it as a bible?
    You won't be able to shoot a bathroom scene with a 200mm lens.
    I do realize that perfect photographers want top notch quality at all times. It took me 33 years to get rid of that imperfection and to realize that storytelling is about more than beautiful pixels. If technology cannot keep up with the need of curious mind, then it is nothing more than an obsolution.
    I do have both the Laowa 16mm and the canon RF 16mm, but ever since I acquired the canon, the Laowa sits in the box: doesn't have autofocus.
    I have been intrigued by Laowa for their ability to get out of that bubble of experienced photographers, and to get many to the land of curiosity and new ideas, yet, unable to get themselves out of that manual world. You give people abilities they have never experienced before, yet you drag them back to the age of my forefathers.
    What good is rectilinearity for, if you miss the shot?
    I know, we do not shoot the same thing. This gives me the right to have an opinion that manual lenses are useless. It is not a complaint, it is a statement of need.

    On a side note, why would I use a smartphone to take a picture, if I have an R5? I don't understand the suggestion.
    UW lenses are not just for static subjects. I use it to shoot volleyball and basketball games, I use mine to shoot tight space scenes such as in a metro and in a fridge. I use it on gimbal, I shoot manual macro with it, I shoot band rehearsal, and for all these examples, I need autofocus, and never missed rectilinearity. It would be great to have it, but not a must as much as autofocus is.
  7. Don 't you love it when people stick to what they know and treat it as a bible?
    You won't be able to shoot a bathroom scene with a 200mm lens.
    I do realize that perfect photographers want top notch quality at all times. It took me 33 years to get rid of that imperfection and to realize that storytelling is about more than beautiful pixels. If technology cannot keep up with the need of curious mind, then it is nothing more than an obsolution.
    I do have both the Laowa 16mm and the canon RF 16mm, but ever since I acquired the canon, the Laowa sits in the box: doesn't have autofocus.
    I have been intrigued by Laowa for their ability to get out of that bubble of experienced photographers, and to get many to the land of curiosity and new ideas, yet, unable to get themselves out of that manual world. You give people abilities they have never experienced before, yet you drag them back to the age of my forefathers.
    What good is rectilinearity for, if you miss the shot?
    I know, we do not shoot the same thing. This gives me the right to have an opinion that manual lenses are useless. It is not a complaint, it is a statement of need.

    On a side note, why would I use a smartphone to take a picture, if I have an R5? I don't understand the suggestion.
    UW lenses are not just for static subjects. I use it to shoot volleyball and basketball games, I use mine to shoot tight space scenes such as in a metro and in a fridge. I use it on gimbal, I shoot manual macro with it, I shoot band rehearsal, and for all these examples, I need autofocus, and never missed rectilinearity. It would be great to have it, but not a must as much as autofocus is.
    What you meant to say is "This gives me the right to have an opinion that manual lenses are useless FOR ME AND MY NEEDS". That's better now, nobody will argue against that! :)

    You can shoot action with a manual lens as long as you are the correct distance away, so that the subject falls into the very deep depth of field that UW lenses have. This way, AF speed and accuracy won't really matter.

    Why use a smartphone to take a picture if you have an R5? If you want to use lenses incorrectly, and take UW portraits really close up to produce badly distorted images of people's faces, so they look like every other smartphone face snapshot/selfie, you don't need a premium full-frame camera worth several thousands of dollars badly paired in a very mismatched way with a low image quality, entry-level cheap plastic 16mm lens. You can do it much more cheaply, easily and conveniently with any smartphone, and post it on social media instantly. :oops:

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment