October 21, 2014, 05:46:19 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - JonAustin

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
Lenses / Re: Anybody still holding out for a Canon 24-70 f/2.8 with IS?
« on: October 13, 2014, 09:28:05 PM »
I've decided I won't buy another lens without IS. Given the 16-35 f/4 and the 24-70 f/4, it's reasonable to presume that a 24-70 f/2.8 IS is in the product roadmap. In the meantime, I'll get by with my 24-105L and fast primes.

Technical Support / Or you can just use IrfanView
« on: October 05, 2014, 10:39:31 PM »

(And don't forget to download and install the plug-ins!)

Canon General / Almost too precious for words
« on: September 28, 2014, 08:42:43 AM »
Was Linda McCartney / is Stella McCartney a photographer, or is Stella just trading on her dead mother's name?

EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: Would you buy a high MP Canon EOS 5DIV?
« on: September 27, 2014, 09:56:00 AM »
I'm waiting for the announcement / release of the 5D4 (whatever resolution it has), so that the price of the 5D3 will drop enough for me to buy a second copy.

Software & Accessories / Re: How do you carry your tripod around?
« on: September 16, 2014, 06:30:19 PM »
On my wife's backpack!  8)

Lenses / Re: 100-400mm and more DO lenses confirmed
« on: September 16, 2014, 06:26:04 PM »
In addition to confirmation that Canon's actually working on a 100-400 II, I like the tease that built-in extenders may find their way into more lenses. I think a 300/f4L IS Extender 1.4x would be awesome!

Lenses / Re: Input on building a prime lens kit
« on: September 14, 2014, 04:56:49 PM »
The depth and variety of opinions offered up in this thread are the reasons why a forum like this is priceless.

I most relate to the viewpoints expressed by Mt Spokane and Rusty the Geek. I started into SLR photography about 12 years ago, thinking I had to cover the entire focal length range (up to at least 300mm) with L zooms, as well as a good variety of L or "just below L" primes.

I've purchased and sold a good number of lenses over these years, and of late, have been paring down my lens collection, getting rid of (freeing myself from) glass that just didn't get used.

My kit now comprises a 24-105, 70-200 II, 50CM and 100L. I sold my 1.4x II extender recently, and don't intend to replace it. Likewise, my 17-40, which saw a lot less action after I moved from APS-C to full frame. I'll only get the 16-35/4L IS if a definite need arises. I only use the 100L for portraits (sold my 85/1.8 after I got it), and lately I've been thinking I could substitute the 70-200 II for those portrait sessions and lose nothing.

That little GAS voice inside me keeps whispering that I should pick up a 24- or 35mm IS prime, while I wait for Canon's mythical 50mm IS and 100-400 II lenses to appear. When that happens, I just look at how infrequently I use my current primes, and then I convince myself that my money's better left in my wallet.

Lenses / Re: What New Lens are You Most Excited About?
« on: September 12, 2014, 02:38:54 PM »
None of the above. I'm much more interested in the recently released 16-35/4L IS and the mythical 100-400 II.

Not to make people feel old, but it was not that long ago when our home computers had only 40mb drives.   >:(

My first HDD was 10MB!

Lenses / Re: When will we see a replacement for the 100-400?
« on: September 10, 2014, 06:43:56 PM »
I voted "when hell freezes over," because I'm holding out for a mark II release. Even if it doesn't take forever, it's starting to feel like it.

I have a 70-200 II, and rarely shoot longer (sold my 1.4x II with my 70-200 I), but the ability for further reach would come in handy from time to time. I get the "gateway lens" argument, but I doubt I'll ever be in the market for one of the big whites.

A 300 f/4L IS II + 1.4x III or a 400 f/5.6L IS would fit the bill, too.

The new 16-35 f/4L is also on my radar, so I'll probably spring for one of those next time I absolutely have to buy new glass.

Photography Technique / Re: Cropping
« on: September 09, 2014, 11:05:03 AM »
the easiest solution is to crop to the aspect of the size you want, if you want 16"x9", crop to 4:3. (16/9=4/3) In photoshop or lightroom you can just type in the size you want and then adjust the frame to fit the content you want.

Sorry, but in what mathematical universe does 16/9 = 4/3?

(Good discussion in general in this thread; I've learned all of this through trial and error over the years.)

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Preorder Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T*
« on: September 09, 2014, 10:57:47 AM »
If you are fortunate enough to be able to afford the best, and you want to use what will be widely regarded as the best MF lens on the market, then there will be plenty of people that will buy it. Some people will not see US$ 4,500 as a lot of money, others do. If you can afford it great, if you can't and want it then work towards getting it, if you don't want it then that's ok too. Everyone is happy.

+ $1

Canon General / Re: Those D'oh moments!
« on: September 09, 2014, 10:54:56 AM »
No mistake is as timeless or universal as raising the camera to your eye, seeing nothing but black, then taking the lens cap off and trying again.

This is probably the #1 reason why I upgraded to SLRs from my (pre-Live View) P&S bodies, with their separate viewfinders: too many photos of nothing, because I left the lens cap on. Have also unintentionally left the self-timer on, on more than one occasion.

Went to an outdoor arena a couple of months ago, all set to capture a few choice images of one of my friend's performances (community theater). Camera, two lenses, monopod, spare batteries ... no memory cards! None in the body, none in the bag, none in my pockets (and none in the car, either!). The only thing that garnered more attention from the members of the audience around me than my setting up the gear, was my breaking it back down and putting it all away before the performance even started!

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: SIGMA 150-600!!
« on: September 05, 2014, 10:35:15 AM »
It'll be interesting to see side-by-side performance comparisons between this and the Tamron.

There's a reason why pros use battery packs, which is something you might consider

Battery packs can actually contribute more to flashes overheating as they dont limit recycle rate as much as AAs. That's why I DONT use battery packs and instead use highly rated rechargeables. I had a quantum turbo SC completely fry two 580ex flashes before I made the switch. Haven't had a problem since.
Ouch - thanks for letting me know.  I'm more of a f/1.2-f/2 shooter, but sometimes use flash.  The battery pack has worked well for me, but I don't go too crazy with the flash.  I could see how easy it would be to overdo it, though.

ahsanford, since you'll be using lots of flash, scratch my advice on battery packs...

I've never used a battery pack, but I've done day-long portrait sessions with lots of flash use. I could be wrong (and I frequently am), but I thought that speedlites have internal circuitry to extend the interval between firing and ready status when they get too hot, regardless of the power source.

Now, if the battery pack is defective and serves up, i.e., too high a voltage, that's another story.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15