1
Lighting / Re: Ok, I just snagged a 600EX-Rt, now what? (Questions on use, and going forward).
« on: May 22, 2013, 04:57:58 PM »
That cable will work but doesn't it kinda defeat the point? Just sayin'...
May 23, 2013, 09:24:23 AM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Lenses / Re: Can the 70-200 2.8L II IS replace my 100L and 135L?
« on: May 22, 2013, 04:51:53 PM »Again, I already sold my 100L, kept the 135L and bought the 70-200L. Version II of course. I also bought a 500D close up lens for the little macro work I wanna do, sure I don't get 1:1 but easily the double of what the 70-200 can natively do.
Anywho, if I find myself in need of a macro anytime in the future, I can just grab another 100 non L, or a Tamron 90 VC or something like that, it's just no need for a L anymore.
Out of curiosity, can you see a difference in shots from the 135L and 100L?
You couldn't, I used florianbielers images in our 100 vs 135 match off, you didn't have a clue which lens was used.
PBD, Your simply astounding that you tracked this comment down enough to repost another a comment about it.
And yes, I can see the difference thank you very much.
3
Lenses / Re: Can the 70-200 2.8L II IS replace my 100L and 135L?
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:42:38 PM »
Out of curiosity, can you see a difference in shots from the 135L and 100L?
The 100L already is sharp, but the 135L is somehow a bit sharper. Plus it's got one additional stop and its USM is quite a chunk faster than the 100's. If to decide between 100 and 135, go with the 135 unless you need stabilization or weather sealing.
Noted.
4
Lighting / Re: Ok, I just snagged a 600EX-Rt, now what? (Questions on use, and going forward).
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:39:20 PM »
I learned one thing about purchase's, buy what you want from the start and save for that. I've made the mistake of buying twice by cheaping out on certain pieces of equipment.
I'd say just wait to get more 600's, I have 4 from CPS loan and I'm hooked.
I'd say just wait to get more 600's, I have 4 from CPS loan and I'm hooked.
5
Lenses / Re: Can the 70-200 2.8L II IS replace my 100L and 135L?
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:33:13 PM »Again, I already sold my 100L, kept the 135L and bought the 70-200L. Version II of course. I also bought a 500D close up lens for the little macro work I wanna do, sure I don't get 1:1 but easily the double of what the 70-200 can natively do.
Anywho, if I find myself in need of a macro anytime in the future, I can just grab another 100 non L, or a Tamron 90 VC or something like that, it's just no need for a L anymore.
Out of curiosity, can you see a difference in shots from the 135L and 100L?
6
Lenses / Re: Do you wish your 70-200L were black?
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:24:24 PM »Not in texas, Black gets hot quick.
You'd need a white camera too then.
Camera not so bad rubber grips, but a hot black hunk of metal 70-200L is not desired by me.
7
Lenses / Re: Do you wish your 70-200L were black?
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:19:32 PM »
Not in texas, Black gets hot quick.
8
Lenses / Re: 50mm.. Upgrade or not?
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:17:56 PM »
The 50L is really for 50mm nuts like myself. It just has character.
9
Lenses / Re: Disappointed with 50 f/1.2 sharpness @ f/1.2
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:15:18 PM »Wow, That's pretty unsharp. My 50L doesn't look near as bad as yours.
How does your lens compare at f/1.2 and f/2.8, RLPhoto?
http://ramonlperez.tumblr.com/post/34906285033/fast-prime-shoot-out-pt-2-50mm-1-2l-review
10
PowerShot / Re: Best solution for really shaky hands
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:12:28 PM »
My g15 has been fantastic lately. Been using the H-IS system and Fast glass to get good shots.
11
Lenses / Re: Disappointed with 50 f/1.2 sharpness @ f/1.2
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:09:00 PM »
Wow, That's pretty unsharp. My 50L doesn't look near as bad as yours.
12
Lenses / Re: Downgrading my equipment - looking for advice
« on: May 22, 2013, 03:07:14 PM »
The 28mm 1.8 is not too shabby, and its cheaper + 50mm 1.4/1.8 + 100mm/135L F/2
13
Pricewatch Deals / Re: 600EX-RT speedlite deals?
« on: May 22, 2013, 02:53:15 PM »
I snagged Three!
14
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon Foveon Sensor
« on: May 22, 2013, 02:53:00 PM »
It could be useful in a FF, High MP, native 50 ISO 1DS body but IT WILL BE A STICKER SHOCKER.
15
Software & Accessories / Re: Adobe Creative Cloud - Adobe Owns you!
« on: May 21, 2013, 06:32:47 PM »Just a note of how users are reacting, the petition is over 20,000 signatures. Let's say that they only bought Photoshop CS at one point @ 699$ and refuse to update.
https://www.change.org/petitions/adobe-systems-incorporated-eliminate-the-mandatory-creative-cloud-subscription-model
That's around 14 Million less dollars for adobe, not including other apps, just Photoshop. I do hope adobe wakes up.
You do realise Adobe is a multinational corporation with a market capitalisation of around 22 billion US dollars and sales around 13 million A DAY? If every one of those objectors refused to ever give Adobe another cent their sales would see less than a 1/3 of 1% drop.
Not saying don't object, just putting it in perspective.
20,000 Users petitioned, that doesn't mean they're isn't more like 100,000 or more. Even yet, add Dreamweaver, Fireworks, and Indesign and you've got hundreds of millions of dollars. Adobe won't go bankrupt over night but over time could lead to its waning as the market leader.
So yes, It's relative.