February 01, 2015, 11:57:25 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - DJL329

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Samyang/Rokinon Tease 135mm Lens
« on: December 23, 2014, 08:04:04 PM »
Who knows, maybe they're on the 5:15.

EOS Bodies / Re: 2015 wishlist
« on: December 22, 2014, 09:25:26 PM »
In addition to the oft-mentioned 50mm f/1.4 IS, I would like a 600mm f/4 DO IS.

Is it available for pre-order from B&H, yet?   ::)

Reviews / Re: Solid DPReview video (20+ min) with a wildlife photographer
« on: November 10, 2014, 07:33:41 PM »
I don't have the time, but I am wondering about using a 16-35mm lens to photograph wildlife.  Maybe in a Zoo.  The 200-400 seems more like it.

The 16-35mm lens was used for landscape photos.  The photographer, Adam Jones, gave a nice presentation at Canon's booth at Photo Expo Plus two weeks ago, so I had already seen a lot of the photos.

Lenses / Re: Introducing the Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II
« on: November 08, 2014, 01:34:19 PM »
It's beautiful, can't wait to get my hands on the legendary unicorn.


What's next?  A new 50mm f/1.4?  The mythical 3D?

Lenses / Re: Another EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II Mention
« on: November 05, 2014, 01:38:26 PM »
"... stating the lens would be coming in November."

Yeah, but did they mention which year?!?  :P

I currently have the EF 28mm f/1.8, which I have used for at least 4 years and really like it.  However, I have been considering the EF 24mm f/2.8 IS to replace it, as I sometimes want to get a bit wider.

on Flickr

on Flickr

If you cannot afford one of these new, try Canon's refurbished site:


Lenses / Re: Selling 200-400
« on: October 04, 2014, 01:01:58 PM »
... Action in the bush happens fast...

That's what ... oh, nevermind...

I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the 400 DO IS II, you can be sure that's going to be the premium wildlife lens for many, many people.

I'm guessing he makes use of the zoom and the built in tc.  He's got a 200-560mm lens in one package.  When that lens came out some guy was gushing about how great it is to be able to switch things up so quickly, claimed it was better than having a set of primes (and yeah, 200, 300, 400 + tc is a lot carry around).

That said, I agree with you on the 400mm DO, I have the mark I version and while it is a little less contrasty than some lenses, it's a great lens, I love it.  So darn light for what it is - it's the size and weight of my 200mm f2.  I can literally hand hold it with one hand (why I would want to I can't say but it's possible).

I'll be taking a hard look at the mark II, if it is significantly better I'll make the jump, that's a great lens.  I'd love a 500mm f4 DO.

Canon has released a few 600mm DO patents, including this one for a 600mm f/4 DO.  That's what I'd like to get, though I may bite the bullet and get either the 400mm f/4 DO or the 500mm f/4L II next Spring.


Animal Kingdom / Re: Bears in the Wild
« on: September 23, 2014, 11:59:39 PM »
I am pretty familiar with black bears. Not so much grizzles, and their behavior is quite different.
#1 rule of black bears is they feel the same way about you as you do about them. if you come around a corner and BOOM you are within swatting distance of a bear and he is suprised, you might be in trouble. thats the idea of bear bells, to give some advance warning. a dog or walking companions or singing also works.

When I see a bear, I stop, check for cubs, stay in plain view, and slowly get closer until it notices me. then i stop, take pictures and wait for it to either back off or stand its ground. keep eye contact, move slowly and deliberately. i have never had a bear do anything other than evaluate the situation and either tolerate me or leave.

Worst comes to worse and you get in a bad situation, prevailing wisdom is first back away slowly maintaining eye contact, and if you get charged (they paw the ground and bluff a few times first), either play dead or fight back while yelling, depending on how commited you think the bear is. I know of several people who have been charged and their yelling and stone throwing and stick swinging made the bear change its mind. Once the bear makes contact, play dead, they arent hunting you for food, they are trying to win a fight, so make them think they won. Never EVER EVER climb a tree or try and run away, bears legs are twice as long as they look, and they dont slow down AT ALL when they move from flat ground to straight up a tree.

Good stuff, however everything I've ever read on bear encounters states to avoid making eye contact, as it can be perceived as a threat by the bear.  Also, when it comes to black bears, you should fight back, instead of playing dead.



Lenses / Re: Official: Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II
« on: September 15, 2014, 11:41:33 PM »
It certainly looks nice -- love the size/weight/MTF -- but I think it's too short for birding.  I've been trying to talk myself into buying the 500mm f/4L II, so I'm hoping this lens lives up to its promise, so that Canon releases a 600mm f/4 DO!   ;D

Dang!  I just bought the Pixma PRO-100...   :P

Landscape / Re: Beautiful sunsets
« on: July 07, 2014, 09:28:43 PM »
This was just between sunset and sunrise.

Noon?!?   :P

If you buy it at B&H (free shipping), the Canon Pixma Pro-100 is just $98 after a $300 mail-in rebate.  I had to get one last month, because my old Canon i9900 finally bit the dust after 10 years, and it only took a few weeks to receive the rebate.  It includes the SG-201 Photo Paper Plus Semi-Gloss 13 x 19" (50 Sheets) at no additional cost, which is needed to receive the $300 rebate.


B&H also has the Canon Photo Paper Pro Luster 13x19" (50 Sheets) on sale for $41 (almost half off).


Lenses / Re: EF 50 f/1.2L II Gets a Mention by Canon
« on: May 19, 2014, 10:40:16 PM »
I can't watch the video right now, but is it poasible when referring to the 50L II they might mean the current 50mm f/1.2L? Because technically the 50L f/1.0 was the first 50L.

No, because when Canon makes a major change in the spec, such as the aperture (in this case, from f/1.0 to f/1.2) or adds IS, they do not consider the new lens to be a "Mark II."  Other examples of this are the EF 200mm f/2.0L IS, which replaced the EF 200mm f/1.8L (change in aperture and addition of IS), and the EF 300mm f/4.0L IS, which replaced the EF 300mm f/4.0L (addition of IS).  In either case, the new lens did not receive the "Mark II" designation.

What is possible is that Canon is teasing us with the EF 50mm f/1.2 II to slow down sales of the new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART, or it was simply a typo.

Pricewatch Deals / Adorama Email Ad
« on: March 09, 2014, 02:19:00 PM »
Did anyone else notice this in Adorama's email advertisement on March 7th?   :o   I did a double-take on the picture and the price before reading the description above it...   :'(

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32