March 06, 2015, 05:01:01 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wsmith96

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 38
1
Canon General / Re: Lens advice for shooting Yellowstone winter
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:49:50 PM »
I went to Yellowstone a couple of years ago and took my 70-300 IS USM (non-L).   I found that having the zoom was great for my pictures, though I did find that most shots were from 250-300mm when using this lens.   I'm not sure if a tele-prime would have helped me or not as at the time I only had one body, but the zoom stayed on my camera 90% of the time. 

You may want to look at the 100-400 mk ii L as well.

2
Damn, all I'm getting is birds on horses, not the other way 'round :->



You weren't using the 70D.  The 60D only catches birds on other animals, not other animals on birds. :)

3
Canon General / Re: Spartans, What is your profession?
« on: March 01, 2015, 04:18:47 AM »
I always wondered which was the first cat image  ;D

I spent quite a bit of time in Silicon Valley in the mid to late eighties (I was an ASIC designer in those days) and remember this era well. Very exiting times.

Who were you designing ASICs for?

4
Canon General / Re: Spartans, What is your profession?
« on: February 28, 2015, 01:49:06 PM »
I'm a data center network engineer for HP and I love it.  The environment is constantly changing there and I get to take all of our new products and learn how to implement and optimize them so we can showcase to our customers.  Photography is my hobby and I also teach photography to kids in our local 4-H club.

5
Technical Support / Re: Optimal processing platform of still images
« on: February 27, 2015, 10:40:41 PM »
Great...now I've got G.A.S. for a new computer....

here's the link to HP's workstation line if you are interested.

http://www8.hp.com/us/en/campaigns/workstations/overview.html

6
Technical Support / Re: Optimal processing platform of still images
« on: February 27, 2015, 12:16:12 PM »
Hi Eldar.   As others have pointed out, you may want to stick with Mac since you already have an investment with Apple. 

My set up is pretty basic.  I used to build all of my systems, spending hours and dollars trying to create the fastest system possible, but now I've changed and would rather use the tools than tinker with getting them to work.

I purchased a refurbished HP Z400 workstation and 2 x 24" Z2440w monitors.  I run windows 7 on them and use adobe photoshop cs6, premiere elements, and lightroom.  I've had this system since 2009 and it just now is starting to show its age.  I highly recommend looking at a workstation class computer from your computer vendor of choice because they are built differently and they just run.   I wouldn't expect it to show great performance stats like you see in the reviews (which tend to focus on gaming performance), but they are built to work rather than for entertainment and everyday activities and adobe provides optimizations for workstation products.   To date, I've not had a crash or component failure.  That's what I was looking for - something that would enable me to enjoy my photography and not be a distraction from that. 

Of course, YMMV and I'm not trying to discount any other compute solutions.  Just conveying what works for me.

I will buy another HP workstation and would recommend you check them out.  Do a search for HP Remarket workstation and you can find the refurb website for HP.

Regards and good luck.

* edit - you had asked about graphics cards in a later post.  Sorry, I post responses at work sometimes and I don't have a lot of time to read each posting in a thread.   I'm using a Quadro 2000 for my image editing.  photoshop takes a little bit of an advantage of the Cuda cores, but Lightroom does not from my understanding of the specs list.  I don't do any 3D work so the 2000 is a good choice for image editing without breaking the bank.  I don't have anything 4k, so I'm no help there for a recommendation.   I do know that HP also has dreamcolor displays that are 30 bit and you need a workstation graphics card to take advantage of that.   Honestly, I don't think you will see that big of a difference if you go that route for just image editing.


7
Lenses / Re: Affected with GAS, Gear Acquisition Syndrome
« on: February 24, 2015, 10:42:05 AM »
Ouch - sorry to hear that.  Hopefully you weren't on the hook for any of that.

8
Lenses / Re: Affected with GAS, Gear Acquisition Syndrome
« on: February 24, 2015, 10:15:57 AM »
For all of those afflicted with GAS, I'll offer some assistance.  You can charge all of your gear to my credit card.  The number is 37 - oh wait, I have to run - will give you the rest of the number later...

still waiting...... :)

9
Lenses / Re: APS-C 60mm or 100mm macro lens?
« on: February 23, 2015, 09:20:36 AM »


... the sample shot just above is a good demonstration: the fur near the camera is in focus, the eye just barely and the head is already clearly out of focus even for web size, never mind the wings.

Btw in my experience the working distance isn't so important for butterflies, either they decide to flee very early on or sit still unless you bump 'em with the lens. It's more about getting your own lens into the way of the ambient light or flash(es) that makes the difference with longer focal lengths.

Agreed - this shot was taken with the aperture wide open and the light source was troublesome in relation to the position of the lens.

10
Lenses / Re: APS-C 60mm or 100mm macro lens?
« on: February 22, 2015, 11:04:58 PM »
Yes, working distance with an insect,or arachnid, will be tricky with the 60 macro, but it can be done.  Sometimes you get a subject that is well behaved like the one below (which was taken with a 60 macro).

11
Lenses / Re: APS-C 60mm or 100mm macro lens?
« on: February 22, 2015, 02:15:19 PM »
I'm in the same boat as you, but I do have the 60 macro.  I really enjoy this lens, but late last year I purchased a FF camera and I'd like to have just one macro I can use on both cameras.   I'll get the 100L when that time comes, but my 60 macro is on the "to sell" list.   I would recommend you go for the EF lens. 

12
Lenses / Re: which telephoto for travel?
« on: February 21, 2015, 05:13:05 PM »
you can use it w/ or w/o the tripod collar.

Which is nice because for only €1300, you don't get a tripod collar with the lens from Canon ... but I won't bitch around, they did include the lens hood so there's good value for you :->

Your not bitter at all are you...... :) :) :) :)  j/k

13
Lenses / Re: which telephoto for travel?
« on: February 21, 2015, 05:12:22 PM »
I would stick with the 24-70F4 and 70-200F4.   Find a nice shoulder bag and enjoy your travels.

14
I've not shot a collegiate dive/swim meet, but my daughter is a novice diver.  I don't have experience shooting swimming, but with diving my go to lenses are the 85 1.8 and the 70-200 F2.8 Mk II.  My cameras struggle with lower light and I've found that the natatoriums I've been to have poor lighting.  I think you will be fine with what you have, but you may want to consider renting the 200 F2 so you can keep your shutter speed up.

Couple of pics - first is a 5D with the 70-200 @ 200mm and the second is a T1i with the 85mm @ 1.8.


15
Lenses / Re: Which Lens to buy for Portraits
« on: February 19, 2015, 02:42:35 PM »
From your provided list of choices, I would recommend the 85mm f1.8.  It's a great lens that would have a similar FOV as a 135mm on a FF camera.  Good for headshots.  After that, I think you are set with your nikkor.  I typically view 50mm-135mm as the portrait lens range, but on a crop that would be around 35-85mm. 

If you are happy with your 50mm, you may want to think about a 35mm F2.0 IS.  I don't own one, but I've read that it's a good lens for the money and would fill any need for a full body photograph without having to backup as far.

I also have used the 60mm 2.8 macro for headshots.  It's a very sharp lens for crops, but may not offer any advantage over the 50mm you already own.

And, as previously stated, the 24-70 2.8 mk II is a great lens (if you aren't looking for faster than 2.8) if you would rather have 1 lens than a handful of them.

Last, if you are shooting over f4.0, then there also is the 24-105L.  I've got that one too and you can find them at good prices if you shop around.  I would recommend the 24-70 over this lens if money is not an issue, but this lens does produce some nice images.

Good luck!

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 38