September 23, 2014, 10:36:09 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noncho

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
1
PowerShot / Re: New PowerShot Digital Compact Camera Under Development
« on: September 22, 2014, 11:31:15 AM »
Great, just make it less than 16MP.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: 70D or 7D MK II
« on: September 20, 2014, 01:21:52 PM »
You have AF and picture quality on 5D Mark III - I would go for articulated screen, smaller body and wifi remote control on 70D.

3
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: POLL: What's more important, gps or wifi?
« on: September 19, 2014, 12:56:50 PM »
WiFi for the great remote control options.

5
EOS Bodies / Re: 7DII No Wifi
« on: September 15, 2014, 03:41:34 PM »
+1

I like the WiFi on 70D for remote shooting.

6
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Accessory question
« on: September 14, 2014, 04:59:57 AM »
Canon FD 50 1.4 is good and should be compact enough for M. I was thinking for something like that too :)

For the batteries - I have 2 noname, but working as the original one(maybe a bit less capacity). They were 14$ on Ebay year ago.

Strap - For M with small lenses I'm using one small hand strap from old Powershot.

7
PowerShot / Re: The New Canon PowerShot G7 X
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:41:42 AM »
Yep, looks like great little camera with good lens.

8
EOS Bodies / Re: More Images of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:40:30 AM »
Still not a word about buffer size...

9
PowerShot Cameras / Re: Canon Powershot G7 X Specs and Image Leaked
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:44:12 AM »
Sounds good, 20mp are too much for 1" sensor.

10
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Buffer speed
« on: September 12, 2014, 10:46:06 AM »
As far as I know the write speed of xxD series is about 40mb/s, so faster card won't help...

11
Lenses / Re: The New Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II
« on: September 11, 2014, 09:43:08 AM »
The weight is too close to the 300 2.8L IS II which is more versatile...

12
EOS-M / Re: Well, someone believes in the future of the M.....
« on: September 01, 2014, 02:50:59 AM »
I prefer smaller cheaper autofocus 1.4 lens than that.

13
EOS-M / Re: Finally a 50mm for EOS-M...
« on: September 01, 2014, 02:46:21 AM »
This Samyang is not good for M.

Canon need to make native 50 for M, this will boost M sales.

I would also like(I know they won't make it):
75 2.0 IS macro(not 1:1).
100 2.0/135 2.8 small telephoto/portrait lens.
50-125 2.8 IS good quality telephoto zoom which covers 80-200 FF distance.

With lenses like that and upgraded M3 body I would use my DSLR only for birds.

14
Lenses / Re: New Lens Information for Photokina
« on: August 29, 2014, 07:56:32 AM »
EF-S 24 2.8 - I have 22 2.0 for M - No, thanks.
24-105 - slow FF kit - No, thanks.
400 4.0 DO IS II might be interesting, but I guess I won't like the price.

So, let's see what Sigma have prepared for Photokina.

15
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70d center focus point -bug- problem
« on: August 07, 2014, 02:34:30 PM »
I've made some more tests with Canon 50 1.4 and Sigma 105 2.8 OS Macro.

With 50 1.4 - good on close distance, bad central focus point with distance more than about 3 meters.

Even with Sigma 105 the problem with central focus point is there at distance.

Here is an example with 50 1.4:
Central point:
http://www.nonchoiliev.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/50-1.4-central-point.jpg
Other point:
http://www.nonchoiliev.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/50-1.4-non-central-point.jpg

It's a huge difference, many of images taken at central point focus are not usable.   

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12