March 06, 2015, 04:47:15 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noncho

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
1
EOS-M / Re: EOS-M And EFM22mm Low Light and Portability?
« on: March 04, 2015, 08:16:11 AM »
For me portability mean to be good for a places where DSLR is not appropriate. Like concerts:

2
PowerShot / Re: New PowerShot G17 Coming in Spring [CR2]
« on: February 28, 2015, 04:46:11 PM »
I guess that if other specs are true it won't be 1" sensor. I don't believe they will made G17 bigger than Sony RX10 (1"sensor and f/1.2-2.0 24–168mm will be bigger).

3
Lenses / Re: Gear for upcoming trip to Italy and Greece
« on: February 24, 2015, 04:54:27 AM »
In the old towns you don't need so long lenses, but sometimes there are beautiful views for telephoto lenses outside.

Last few times when I was in Greece, I was using mostly wide angle lens (EOS-M 11-22) and telephoto lens(Sigma 100-300 F4)
Here is an example -  https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=bg&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nonchoiliev.com%2Fblog%2F1434

4
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon 85mm f/1.8
« on: February 22, 2015, 05:16:30 AM »
Am I the only one who hate that purple fringing on 85 1.8 and 100 2.0?:


I know I can easily remove it during post-processing, but I don't wanna see it on the camera screen. 

5
EOS-M / Re: Would you sacrifice smaller LCD screen for built in viewfinder?
« on: February 08, 2015, 03:42:47 AM »
No. I have no need for a built-in viewfinder on a compact camera and am glad Canon agrees for the M. I do not understand why people want these little peep-holes on such cameras. Complete waste of space for me -- on compacts. Add-on solution for those that want them suits me just fine.

Totally agree!

6
EOS-M / Re: Canon EOS M3 Specifications
« on: February 07, 2015, 06:55:34 AM »
I'm shooting RAW+JPEG and that's probably 3 files buffer... Call me again when it's 300 Euro.

7
EOS-M / Re: Canon EOS M3 Specifications
« on: February 06, 2015, 06:47:38 AM »

I think the M3 is a step in the right direction but I will need to think long and hard as to whether to continue to invest in this system (currently I have M, 22, 18-55, 11-22 and EF/EF-M adapter) or cut my losses and look elsewhere for a performer.

I have the same equipment and I'm in the same situation - again pricey body and no signs of incoming good lenses needed for the system...

8
EOS-M / Re: Canon EOS M3 Specifications
« on: February 06, 2015, 04:37:26 AM »
I like the size and I'm fine with the lack of EVF.
BUT the price is not for that class camera.

9
EOS-M / Re: What's the next EF-M lens you'd like to see?
« on: February 05, 2015, 01:16:49 PM »
I wrote it few times somewhere in the forum before...

44 2.0 Pancake
88 2.0 or 70 macro 2.0
135 2.8
15-75 F4 IS
40-120 2.8 IS
...

 

10
EOS-M / Re: First Images of the Canon EOS M3
« on: February 05, 2015, 01:09:48 PM »
I have 3 batteries for M now, but if it's at least 1100Mah (~25% more than now) I'll be OK with the change (+2 third party like now) :)

I don't care about DPAF as far as the AF capabilities are improved.

4.2 FPS is not much, but what I need to know is the buffer size, old M with RAW+JPEG is just unusable for continuous shooting.

11
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Owners Post Your Pictures
« on: February 05, 2015, 10:28:23 AM »
Thanks, it was a great weekend walking trip and mirrorless system is very nice for such places. I still need something like 135 2.8 :)

12
EOS-M / Re: First Images of the Canon EOS M3
« on: February 05, 2015, 10:19:36 AM »
I never thought I would be considering a Samsung camera, but this little fireball has winner written all over it. Might be a worthy alternative for possible M3 buyers. :)

28MP BSI Sensor
4K internal recording
9 FPS
NX-1 AF
Flippy screen
Killer lenses
$799
...

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7658835946/samsung-introduces-nx500-with-nx1-28mp-bsi-sensor#comments

I thought I'm the only one looking at NX500 and the good primes of NX system. Let's see the M3 price...

13
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Owners Post Your Pictures
« on: February 03, 2015, 02:59:16 PM »
Night sky with M, why not :)


It's taken with 11-22@11, F4, 30sec, 3200 ISO


And the next morning before sunrise(HDR, because the foreground was too dark):


The blog with more pictures from that trip in the mountain - http://www.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=bg&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fnonchoiliev.com%2Fblog%2F2357&sandbox=1

P.S. Just pointed to the exact link, translate sometimes don't get it :)

14
EOS-M / Re: First Image of the Canon EOS M3
« on: February 03, 2015, 02:45:18 PM »
That body looks more serious and capable. I'm fine with the lack of viewfinger, articulating screen is fine. I have tried Oly E-M10 and didn't used the VF most of the time, it makes such small camera to look and feel bulky.

I'm interested in new native lenses and AF improvements. Nice and small primes, please!

15
Landscape / Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« on: January 19, 2015, 04:29:48 PM »
Here are my tries with Lovejoy:

70D, Sigma 105 2.8 macro OS, 5 sec, 6400 ISO, freezing cold in the mountain



3.2 sec, 3200 ISO




Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15