September 22, 2014, 10:39:42 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jack Douglas

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59
1
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: September 16, 2014, 10:25:09 AM »
The window was open and the guy had his p&s camera trying to get a long shot when this happened.

Jack

2
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: September 16, 2014, 12:52:13 AM »
Bow summit near Lake Louise, Alberta.
Opposite directions.

Jack

3
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: September 10, 2014, 08:29:00 PM »
Love all the recent shots.  I have nothing, not a good summer but I'm heading out to BC, my neighbor province for about 3 weeks and am hoping for ...... anything will be better than here with my pet nuthatches and blue jays and chickadees! ;)

Jack

4
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: September 10, 2014, 04:26:07 PM »
I agree, let's keep it more light-hearted and less competitive and mainly about birds.

Jack

5
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: September 10, 2014, 11:54:45 AM »
"But there is a definite level of diminishing returns as you go higher up the chain."

Very true and something I learned in forking out $7k of my inheritance on the 300 2.8 II which I compared carefully to the Nikon AF 70-300 I owned.  I see both points of view and the validity of various comments on either side but if you can't justify the $$$ it's a no brainer - enjoy the less expensive gear cause it's still very good. 

Just be careful to not say overly critical things about the high level stuff or folk will get ruffled, but not me.  I do what I like and you do what you like and we still have free speech for now at least.  Heaven help us when the crazys take over.

Jack

6
Just to mention that my set is Kenko and I don't allow them to carry the weight of a lens or use multi-stack with the 300 or 300 X2 (too much play).  Was a great deal on Amazon last year so about $150 for the set (about 1/2 local store price), no regrets.

Another uncropped, ISO 1600 dull day.  300 with 36 ext.  DOF is a real challenge.

Jack

7
Here's Downy with 300 and 36 mm ext.  No cropping.  Set-up from a blind, maybe 5 feet.  Not sure if I really needed the tube for this shot but I had been in closer.  Data is included in the shot.  Everything is automatic and focus is fast.

I love the 300 with and without tubes for butterflies - near macro at a distance.

Jack

8
Landscape / Re: Please share your snow/ Ice Photos with us in CR.
« on: September 05, 2014, 11:46:48 AM »
Coldhands it's rain for you now instead of snow I guess.  Nice shot.  Reminds me of last winter after trudging around in the snow commenting to myself that there was nothing to shot.  Guess there always is if one is truly watchful and selective, but acreas of snowy fields are challenging. ;)

Last Feb was one of those days!

Jack

9
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: September 04, 2014, 11:57:16 AM »
MichaelHodges, really like the mood you've captured there!  Many nice shots from all.

Jack

10
Photography Technique / Re: Intentional "wrong" afma for creative backfocus?
« on: September 04, 2014, 03:44:12 AM »
Here's a sample of what I run into fairly commonly with birds.  The 6D algorithm will pick up on the sharpest features in the region of the eye and for many birds when the DOF is shallow that leaves the eye slightly out of focus.  This is where I may choose a slight backfocus.

This was a vertical shot using the spot upper focus point on the eye.

Jack

11
Phew, I can barely follow all the technical stuff in these CR threads but what seems to be clear to me is that the economics and market determine an awful lot more than we tend to realize and it's not all about who has the superior technology.  Perhaps not unlike a board game with players carefully choosing their moves for fear they will find themselves trapped!

Jack

12
Jon,

"DPAF, even if it gets that sensitivity boost their latest DPAF patent describes, just doesn't interest me enough to matter yet. I don't think it's a viable replacement for PDAF, and won't be for a while still."

I thought the 70D used DPAF in a two pixel phase detect format (PDAF), so could you please clarify.  Apparently, the dual pixels covering most of the sensor can function as selectable AF points.  What's holding this technology back relative to the anticipated 7D2?  It's really hard to believe the 7D2 will actually be a ho hum camera.

Jack

13
Thanks Jon, great comments as usual.

Jack

14
Jon, I don't think that was rude unless a person chooses to take it personally based on other issues.  When there is disagreement it's challenging to keep everyone happy.

You now have the 5D3 which is resolution-wise pretty similar to me with the 6D and we're both wondering about a 7D2 primarily with respect to its IQ.  I'm trying to settle into what really is the truth relative to the reach advantage.  It's pretty clear there is no where near a 60% advantage relative to being reach limited and choosing FF or crop, but I'm prepared to believe 20% is realistic.  Would you be willing to offer what you consider the various deciding factors that would sway you for or against a 7D2 purchase when it arrives.  Let's assume frame rate and AF are acceptible.

Jack

15
6D Sample Images / Re: Anything shot with a 6D
« on: September 01, 2014, 12:57:50 AM »
Still lovin my 6D in spite of the "much criticized AF".  It is possible to get some action shots with a little creativity (and luck!). ;)

Jack

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59