April 17, 2014, 09:29:36 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - e-d0uble

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art Gets Reviewed
« on: April 14, 2014, 10:45:36 AM »
It was painful to do, but I sold my 50 f/1.2L two months ago in lieu of this lens.  I'll miss its stubby little body and the fine shots it often produced.  I will miss f/1.2  as well, but I can live with f/1.4.

Sigma's 35mm 1.4A is absolutely fabulous, but in practice it's a bit too wide for what I want from an f/1.4 lens.  I may sell it as well.  I pre-ordered Sigma's new 50 after reading the reviews that have just surfaced.  I'm sure there will be howling about nervous bokeh and lateral CA from some, and in some cases it'll be warranted.  Either way, I'm still going to give this lens a chance, as there's absolutely no way I'd give Zeiss 4k or buy the 50L the third time around.  If this guy turns out to be a dud in any way I'll bury my head in the sand and wait for a possible new fast 50mm offering from Canon.  If that ends up being the case, something tells me I may be waiting quite some time.

2
Portrait / Re: We, The Photographers......Self Portaits..a Who's Who on CR
« on: February 05, 2014, 06:39:34 PM »
That's me and my wife: tough guys.

3
Lenses / Re: A Big Lens Announcement in September? [CR1]
« on: August 29, 2013, 01:55:58 AM »
50mm f/.95!

4
Software & Accessories / Re: Mac Pro Humor
« on: June 13, 2013, 04:02:08 AM »
It looks like a shiny black automotive oil filter.

5
Lenses / Re: What else can I do with my Canon 100mm Macro IS lens?
« on: June 04, 2013, 02:59:12 PM »
This lens is fantastic for portraits, inside or out.  Here's a recent one shot with it:

http://stinkfoot.org/pix/jean_kitty.jpg

6
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
« on: May 29, 2013, 01:56:58 AM »
This lens is FAR too much fun.  Slow focus?  Who cares, the image quality is unbeatable.  I use it in the studio and for low-light portraits all the time.

7
Lenses / Re: Disappointed with 50 f/1.2 sharpness @ f/1.2
« on: May 23, 2013, 07:14:48 PM »
Actually, that shot couldn't have been done with the 50mm f/1.4, because it was taken at f/1.2.  :)

Yes, you could. Assuming the man is exaclty 3 meters away, just go 25 cm closer to him and crop the picture to
the same frame.  Voila, you got the same depth of field (0.25m). At the same time you could adjust the ISO to 1/3
of a stop brighter if you like the speed of shutter.

Sorry to disappoint you. Physic beats money ;) And the colors are not that well choicen...

These forums rarely disappoint me, and Mr. Spock wouldn't dig that fallacious argument, but I'll stop there.

8
Lenses / Re: Disappointed with 50 f/1.2 sharpness @ f/1.2
« on: May 23, 2013, 06:46:00 PM »
This picture could've been done with the 50mm f1.4 aswell. But I drift your catch. Don't know why to spend a
grand more as told before, but well, a f1.2 pic ;)

Actually, that shot couldn't have been done with the 50mm f/1.4, because it was taken at f/1.2.  :)

I had the 50mm f/1.4 once long ago and it's a decent lens, but only decent.  The differences between the two (and other 50mm lenses) have been covered here and elsewhere 1000 times so I won't go any further.  I'll only say this:  A friend of mine once dropped his 50mm f/1.4 to the kitchen floor and it absolutely fell to pieces.  I've (embarrassingly enough) dropped my 50mm f/1.2 several times and it's still in one piece.

9
Lenses / Re: Disappointed with 50 f/1.2 sharpness @ f/1.2
« on: May 23, 2013, 06:09:14 PM »
The 50L can be fairly sharp at f/1.2, just not as sharp as perhaps the 85L II.  Sharpness isn't everything, and this lens has fantastic color and contrast reproduction as well as great bokeh (which is why I shoot it wide open).  Here's an example of it wide open:

http://stinkfoot.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=2024

Lots of CA, and certainly not sharp like the 135L but I don't mind  :)

10
EOS Bodies / Re: Download Firmware 1.2.1 link for 5DIII
« on: April 26, 2013, 01:46:51 PM »
Looks like the file's been removed from dropbox.  Perhaps some kind soul who already grabbed the file could repost it somewhere so I can brick my camera?    :)

11
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II
« on: April 16, 2013, 10:58:12 PM »
Perhaps I just had unrealistic expectations regarding this lens (who could blame me, considering the love festival on the internet regarding it), but after another day of shooting with it, I'm not convinced of its quality.  Even after running it through "FoCal" it's producing sub-par results compared to nearly all of my other lenses.  Perhaps I do indeed have a "bad copy", but I tend to find that saying that is often an excuse for naivety or poor photographic skills.
I neglected to mention before that I rented this lens for a week last month, but only had time to use it at an occasion where I shot all night using a flash @f/4-f/8... hardly a good test.  The images that that "copy" produced were very good.. but again.. this is an f/2.8 lens; stopping it down with a flash @1/200th is hardly proving anything.  I have 20 or so more days to return it, so I'll take it out a few more times before I dump or exchange it for another.   >:(

I'd try another copy, when Lensrentals did the tests there was quite a bit of variance, but even the worst Mark II was better than the best Mark 1.

I did try another copy.  See above post including shot of nice looking female.   ;D

12
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II
« on: April 14, 2013, 05:19:32 AM »
I felt that I should post somewhat of a follow-up to what I wrote regarding this lens sometime ago.  I returned the "copy" I had written about, and finally got around to shooting a bunch with its replacement this weekend (after I adjusted it slightly with reikan focal).  In short, the lens is quite good throughout the focal range wide open; and at f/4 through f/8 or so it's excellent.  The bad news is despite what many see "on paper" this lens really isn't that much better (at f/4 and beyond, obviously) than the 24-105, except in the corners where it trounces it.  That being said, the TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II is what I'd grab if I absolutely needed perfection at 24mm.   But I digress.  The 24-70 II definably also handles chromatic aberrations better than almost anything else I've ever used, and it focuses very very quickly.  Problem is, I feel this lens is still way overpriced (yeah, I too paid for it).. 

So, where I'm at.. I'm a sucker for both fast glass and for image stabilization, so I'm still torn as to which to lose.  Chances are I'll sell the 24-105, but I'll be pissed that I shelled out so much for the new guy.  Meanwhile, here's a snap from today... very good for wide open and brightly back-lit.. (50mm, 1/100th, ISO200).  Cheers.

13
Lenses / Re: Which Lens ... 24-70 II or primes?
« on: April 11, 2013, 01:23:49 AM »
I have the 24-105 f/4, 24-70 f/2.8II, and the Sigma 35f/1.4.  I've not ever tried the 24 f/1.4.

The Sigma 35 f/1.4 is a stellar performer, I'm absolutely thrilled with it since day one, and it was worth every cent.  35mm isn't exactly my favorite length either.  The 24-70 f/2.8 II I now have (first one I bought was wonky) is very good, but I'm still not convinced it's worth what Canon is asking for it.  I've still not had enough time with it to determine whether or not it's worth it for me to sell the 24-105 and keep it.

14
Lenses / Re: What is your favorite lens and why?
« on: March 28, 2013, 01:56:24 AM »
I could never choose "one lens to rule them all" unless someone manufactured a complete impossibility such as a 17-200 f/1.2 with IS.  An imaginary beast like that would likely weigh 100lbs, would be three feet long, and would cost 50k. =)

Back to reality.  It's a close toss up between the 85L f/1.2 II "keg" and the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II L.  I suppose the 85L probably tops my list.  In my experience, the big cocoanut is out of this world sharp and nothing bests it in near-zero light.  I adore fast glass, but nothing I've ever used comes close to this lens in sharpness and bokeh wider than f/2.  I'll step back as far as I can as an excuse to use this lens, if at all possible.  I have lots of glass and several overlapping focal ranges, but I can't live without the 85.

I'm slowly beginning to adore the new Sigma 35 f/1.4, I might add.

15
Lenses / Re: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG Sets New Benchmark for Excellence
« on: March 18, 2013, 03:39:29 PM »
I've certainly done some complaining about Sigma lenses in the past, but I rented this sucker for a week and it's quite good.  I had Sigma's 30mm f/1.4 lens for APS-C and it was hit and miss in terms of focus reliability.  Not so for the 35mm f/1.4 on full frame.  The week was up too quickly for me to get a variety of situations shot, but the 35mm was ideal for shooting a band in crummy lighting.  The lens also has a great finish, size and weight to it.  I deliberately shot the band wide open the entire time and was impressed by the results.  I'll likely grab this lens sometime this year.

http://stinkfoot.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2935
http://stinkfoot.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2932


Pages: [1] 2 3