1
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Test Camera [CR1]
« on: March 28, 2013, 11:15:45 AM »
These rumored specs don't impress me much
May 21, 2013, 05:17:41 AM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Development Announcement in the Fall? [CR2]
« on: March 25, 2013, 10:12:32 PM »New process 36 MP sensor
4/5 fps
7D autofocus
5D mkiii body and controls
7D metering
I am not too impressed with 7D autofocus. The 5D3/1DX AF is MUCH MUCH better.
3
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Development Announcement in the Fall? [CR2]
« on: March 25, 2013, 10:09:46 PM »+1. Seriously, some guy just said "very rarely do people shoot in high iso"....are you kidding me?
Some guys are saying that because Canon is not doing too badly in the high ISO department. If Canon falls behind the competition by 1 to 2 stops in high ISO, you'll hear MANY folks screaming they need better high ISO performance.
That's what happened to low ISO DR, no? 
4
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Development Announcement in the Fall? [CR2]
« on: March 25, 2013, 10:25:17 AM »Because if you step outside of the mass, you expose yourself too much and take the whole stagelight for yourself, which is considered as impolite...and Canon are a japanese enterprise...so much more lowprofile acting is requiered. Anybody out there to confirm my humble assumptions, please?
Nikon, Sony, Olympus etc are also Japanese companies.
Besides, Canon was one of the FIRST companies to introduce FF sensors.
5
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Development Announcement in the Fall? [CR2]
« on: March 25, 2013, 01:37:39 AM »Nikon suffered from that until some younger blood finally got to the top. The trouble is, they also need to make a profit. Innovative ideas do not keep a company in business if they don't turn a profit.
Nikon is building a giant plant in Laos to open this fall, apparently hoping to ultimately get their costs down. They also (I think) understand that the warmer weather means more floods and they need to have plan(t) B. I hope it works out for them, lower prices are certainly welcome, and Canon is in the drivers seat right now as far as cost of production is concerned. They drop prices and still make a nice profit.
Great analysis. One reason Nikon has problems with profits is they tried too hard to displace Canon as market leader. But Nikon must also improve their quality control. Obviously, their standard has taken quite a hit recently with the D800 left side misfocus and D600 sensor debris problems...
6
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Development Announcement in the Fall? [CR2]
« on: March 24, 2013, 10:56:44 PM »
So, all eyes on the sensor technology in 7DMk2 and big megapixel camera.... Cooooool....
7
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D, DIGIC 6 & 18mp Sensors
« on: March 21, 2013, 03:34:43 AM »
From DPReview early preview:
"The focusing speed of the updated hybrid phase and contrast-detect design remains unchanged, which unfortunately means that it still lags behind current mirrorless cameras from Sony, Olympus and Panasonic."
Well done Canon for the LACK of progress in this critical department. Wow! I am totally floored.
"The focusing speed of the updated hybrid phase and contrast-detect design remains unchanged, which unfortunately means that it still lags behind current mirrorless cameras from Sony, Olympus and Panasonic."
Well done Canon for the LACK of progress in this critical department. Wow! I am totally floored.
8
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D, DIGIC 6 & 18mp Sensors
« on: March 21, 2013, 01:18:10 AM »If the MP count has not changed then the underlying technology behind the pixels/sensor has not changed. i.e. there will be no DR/noise improvements over the 60D.
Indeed. I do not see why Canon does not want to take advantage of an improved sensor design to venture into higher pixel count territory. It is after all a chance for them to brag.
9
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D, DIGIC 6 & 18mp Sensors
« on: March 21, 2013, 12:35:50 AM »well as you may noticed the 650D had a NEW sensor too.
now how well does that worked out?
worse DXO mark then the 550D sensor and the hybrid focus not worth much.
i will be excited when i see the results of this "new" sensor justify it.
+1
Wish list: contrast AF as fast as OM-D, 14 stops low ISO dynamic range and 0.5 stop improvement in high ISO performance.
Reality: perhaps nothing.... I dare not dream any more, having been disappointed by Canon too many times...
10
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 20, 2013, 09:57:56 AM »Yes, the sensor is important. No, Canon doesn't make the best sensors from an IQ standpoint. But until consumers start buying bare silicon sensors to take pictures, what matters is camera performance, not only sensor performance.
I agree actually. Which is why I do not understand all that negativity when people hears about the 18 MP APS-C sensor... again.
11
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 20, 2013, 07:50:45 AM »Strange, my D600's files are not greenish at all.
I'm sure they are fine. They just appear greenish on Nikon DSLR LCDs.
But the D600 sensor debris problem is VERY real.
12
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 20, 2013, 03:50:38 AM »no not true, the canon full frame sensors are great and have been for ages, 5Dmk3, 1Dx and 6D all do well with regards to noise
The 5D3 and 6D sensors have lower pixel count and poorer low ISO dynamic range compared to that on D800 and D600 respectively. So, there is no technical advantage whatsoever in Canon cameras.
So, woe to Canon users.
13
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 20, 2013, 02:25:29 AM »how about 39 point AF including 9 cross type on the D5200 vs wait for it 9! on the canon
Oh, I did not realize the D5200 has 39 AF points.
I however do not agree the 11 AF points on the D3200 has any advantage whatsoever over the EOS-b.
Also, based on the above arguments, practically all Nikon cameras trash their Canon equivalents in terms of sensor performance, AF points and/or pixel count: the D800 vs 5D3, D600 vs 6D, D7100 vs 7D, D5200 vs T5i, D3200 vs EOS-b. Woe to us Canon users. So, why are we still shooting Canon?
14
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 20, 2013, 01:20:38 AM »That D5200 has an amazing Toshiba APS-C sensor; with excellent Signal to Noise ratios, Dynamic Range and Low Video Moire.
Yes, I am fully aware of the sensor differences: pixel count, low ISO dynamic range etc. But feature wise? I really don't see any feature advantage the D5200 has over the T5i, nor the D3200 over the EOS-b. The T5i has more cross AF sensors and the low weight/size of the EOS-b is nothing to snort at (same weight as OM-D).
15
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 19, 2013, 11:00:59 PM »My only question is why didn't they just make the EOS-B the new rebel?
The EOS-B has very similar specs to this and is a smaller size. At least if the EOS-B was the new rebel they could say that they changed something and made it smaller, lighter, but with even better performance.
This camera seems to be stuck in no mans land.... not so small, not so cheap, and with totally blah specs. At least I could consider trading my T2i for the EOS-B(which I would never do), this camera offers no good reasons to do so.
The EOS-b is simply the equal of Nikon D3200 (just lower pixel count), but much smaller and lighter. Its weight is nearly the same as the OM-D.