September 20, 2014, 01:56:47 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - infared

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 62
121
Canon General / Re: When a Woman is Fed Up...
« on: July 27, 2014, 10:43:16 PM »
Ahhhhh...ain't love grand!   :o

122
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 1.4 Art NOT bokehlicious?
« on: July 27, 2014, 09:29:39 PM »
Touchy subject, eh???  LOL!

123
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Review: Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar T*
« on: July 27, 2014, 03:26:38 PM »
The resolution of the Zeiss is truly amazing. All Zeiss lenses are not this spectacular but WOW that is amazing!
As usual GREAT Review, Dustin!   
The only Zeiss that I have in my kit is the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 and that is pretty impressive as well.

Dustin, are you still planning on reviewing the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art??...I think that you mentioned a while back that you were going to do a review and a comparison, right?
Maybe I missed it, I tried a search but could not find it.
Thanks!

Thanks for the reply Dustin...I thought you may be having difficulty picking up the new Sigma 50mm Art....
I have the older Sigma and I actually like my copy for what it cost and for the bokeh it gives me.... I think it is a cool lens for the price...but DEFINITELY has its flaws....The lens is positioned very well from a cost performance standpoint for what is out there IMHO...they could be found at a nice discount when I bought mine ...but for some reason it seems that the price has gone up to list recently...I think it may be because you are getting decent value for the money. It will be interesting so see what you have to say about it.
Also, I just sold my Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II to purchase the New Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS....  I really like the lens...A LOT...I am considering selling my 21mm Zeiss f/2.8. This new zoom is REALLY sharp!!!!!
Look forward to what you think of it when you review it!!!
Thanks for being here.

Two of my equipment suppliers made promises and then didn't have stock at the review time.  I have just had the original Sigma 50mm f/1.4, which I will do a brief review of (didn't particularly like it), and will do the newer Sigma soon.  I've got the new Tamron "superzooms" right now. (28-300mm VC, and 16-300 VC for crop).  I will be getting the new Canon 16-35mm f/4 IS and the Tamron 18-200mm for the EOS M mount next week.  I've got lots of lenses on the go for review right now, but the Sigma will probably be next.

124
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 1.4 Art NOT bokehlicious?
« on: July 27, 2014, 03:09:58 PM »
Wow...I am considering the new Sigma Art...I am not worried about all of the obsessive insanity on this site about the AF capabilities....I am sure if I get a bad copy...I will just send it back.....
but after looking at Kai's comparison of the bokeh of the three lenses (Nikon 58mm & Canon 50L) with the popsicles....I am amazed at how much the bokeh suffers on the Art lens at the expense of incredible sharpness.
(kindof reminiscent of my Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II...its so sharp...I don't care... I rely on some primes like my old 50mm Sigma and my Canon 85mm f/1.5L when I really want to smear things up!!!)
I currently have an excellent copy original 50mm Sigma f/1.4 which I think is far superior in performance and build to the pathetic Canon 50mm f/1.8 and the Canon 50mm f/1.4 lenses.   I think that for the price, the lens I have is a real winner....
From everything I have read about the new Sigma Art while researching it online...Kai seems a bit off in his opinion on a number of statements.
Everything I have read says the build quality on the Sigma is quite good. I also think he understates the the level of sharpness that the new Art lens has over the Canon L and he does not even mention the superior contrast. I also think his dismissal of the Sigma Lens Dock is also ignorant as it is a very handy tool, I have at the very least updated the firmware on my 35mm Art lens.  For the cost of it ...I think it is a great little accessory with a great potential for tweaks and updates.
This bokeh report and the size of the new Sigma does give me some pause as I do have a very decent, already-paid-for 50mm with great bokeh and very good sharpness in the center.....hmmm..guess you just cannot have it all.
Does anyone know of a more "respected" review of the new Sigma where the bokeh is compared to some other lenses??
 I keep waiting for Dustin Abbott's review of the Sigma Art where I believe he promised some comparison with other lenses, like maybe the old Sigma and the new Otus???  not sure what he said..can't quite remember....but maybe he is having trouble getting his hands on one of the new Art lenses or something...... as they are a bit hard to get a hold on.... I am in no hurry... looking into this is all a bit of fun!!!!!

125
Lenses / Re: Selling my two Zeiss lenses. Your advice?
« on: July 27, 2014, 05:28:44 AM »
Sanj, I have found this to be the case with my Zeiss 21mm f/2.8, an incredible lens, which I bought for its true superiority over the Canon, 16-35mm f/2.8L II,  in both sharpness and contrast.  ...BUT after selling my Canon zoom and purchasing the new  Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS, I have the same dilemma as you...the image quality from the new Canon zoom is so close to my Zeiss that I (horror of horrors! LOL), am considering selling the Zeiss.  Same deal as you...the f/2.8 aperture just isn't enough that I find myself using it, and the IS and the AF on the Canon are making it my lens of choice.
There is that other reason not to sell the Zeiss, though....I get such real enjoyment out of just holding it and lustily coveting it.
The Canon pales in comparison there!   :o
Sanj...I also notice...eh hem....that you are holding on to your Zeiss 135mm f/2.0 which (according to Dustin Abbott's timely review), blows away the Canon counterpart for sharpness and micro contrast.  Very wise of you...as that Zeiss still has practical AND coveting qualities that are second to none!  8)
So...with that in mind it should be easier for you to pry your little fingers off of your 15mm and 35mm Zeiss's and let someone else have a little coveting time, at a discount...c'mon...you can do it...just close you eyes and hold you 135mm...that's a boy....... :'(

126
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Review: Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar T*
« on: July 26, 2014, 06:14:53 PM »
The resolution of the Zeiss is truly amazing. All Zeiss lenses are not this spectacular but WOW that is amazing!
As usual GREAT Review, Dustin!   
The only Zeiss that I have in my kit is the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 and that is pretty impressive as well.

Dustin, are you still planning on reviewing the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art??...I think that you mentioned a while back that you were going to do a review and a comparison, right?
Maybe I missed it, I tried a search but could not find it.
Thanks!

127
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: July 26, 2014, 09:19:04 AM »
Take a stroll...

128
HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Post your HDR images:
« on: July 25, 2014, 04:19:27 PM »
Wow...tough crowd.
OK...let me try something a little brighter..... :D

129
Lenses / Re: Ditching the Primes - Advice/Opinions Needed
« on: July 25, 2014, 06:37:01 AM »
I think everyone is giving good advice here...the 40mm sounds like an easy experiment to see how the range of three primes works....if you want to remain "purest"!    :Pl
I have a lot of primes (see list below)...but I have to say, that since I bought the 24-70mm f/2.8L II, I find myself picking that up a lot more than I did my 24-105mm.  The 24-70mm II is impressively sharp. for any lens, let alone a zoom,  and it would allow you to be much more spontaneous with great versatility.  You might really like it!

130

WOW! That's an INTENSE portrait!...in a good way.

131
Here is a nice dark one......  :-X

<iframe src="https://www.flickr.com/photos/bowne/14599542954/player/d4ff155348" height="1088" width="821"  frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen></iframe>

132
Lenses / Re: Review: Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS
« on: July 23, 2014, 11:45:59 AM »
In actual use...I am REALLY starting to like this lens..I can see I will be using it a whole lot more than the 16-35 f/2.8L II that I sold to buy it...   8)
The sharpness and the contrast are like the 24-70mm f/2.8l II.  Very good for a zoom.

133
Lenses / Re: Sigma 50mm Art 1.4 Focusing problems
« on: July 22, 2014, 08:02:50 AM »
I have an original Sigma 5Omm f/1.4 and it focuses just fine on my 5DIII. Out of the box no adjustments.
I also own a Sigma 35mm Art  and it performed just fine right out of the box as well. No adjustments.

134
HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Post your HDR images:
« on: July 17, 2014, 09:41:03 PM »
Well..its not for everybody...but I like it~   8)

135
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« on: July 16, 2014, 10:35:50 PM »
For those testing the IS, are you half-pressing the shutter (or pressing AF-ON if you use BBF) and then letting the IS system operate for ~0.5 s to fully stabilize the image?  I've often found that if you simply press the shutter on an IS lens, you get a shot that's not much better than no IS.  Here are some tests I did with the 100L.
Good point!!!! I was not considering that although I was half pressing to focus most of the time so I think that the IS was up and running... after listening to the little motor start up you get a feel for what you are saying...it has to start and get up and running and it is NOT instantaneous. Thanks for the help!
I have the 100IS Macro too...and it seems to me that the IS performs better on that lens...so with a wide angle lens I would definitely expect the IS to be so much more effective considering less virtual movement due to the focal length of the wide angle zoom.
Thanks for the help.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 62