January 30, 2015, 07:48:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - K-amps

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 105

#3 is interesting. What lens did you use?

#1 gives me the heeby jeebies

Lenses / Re: Canon EF-S 55-25mm IS STM vs EF 200mm 2.8L II
« on: January 12, 2015, 12:20:52 AM »
Hi MJ:  What about other options? The Bokeh of the 55-250 is not legendary... if eventually you want to go full frame, you are better off investing in EF lenses. Having 2 L lenses that are F2.8 200mm seems like a bit of waste. Just throw a black cover on the 70-200, if it bothers you much.

If I were you, I'd seriously consider the 135 f/2 it can take TC's, and by itself it is great for low light concerts/ sports. It has very fast AF and it's Bokeh is as good as any great lens out there. It is light and inconspicuous. I will admit it is close in length to the 100m macro, but it is a stop faster, 35mm longer and will give you more dreamy blur, and costs not a whole lot.

A try at long Exposure

Landscape / Re: Seashore, Beaches and Harbours
« on: January 10, 2015, 02:42:53 PM »
Nicely done K-amps.

Thanks Click. The Sigma 12-24mm II is a very interesting lens, despite it's shortcomings.

Landscape / Re: Seashore, Beaches and Harbours
« on: January 10, 2015, 02:27:55 PM »
Trying my hand on long exposures....

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 5D Mark III Replacement Talk [CR2]
« on: January 09, 2015, 04:52:12 PM »
If Canon Changed Sensor tech in the 7d2, then expect only minor bump in DR/IQ/Noise for any 5D variant. Don't get your hopes high... Stay close to reality.   :-X

I hope Canon can change the Sensor processing and RAW file algorithms to 18 or 20 bit....

I will probably choose the high MP, low FPS, less AF point model since I am primarily Marco/landscape/portraits. I do not expect them to price it above $4k given that the D810 is out there.

I do hope they extend the spread of the AF points, it's relatively clumped in the 5D3, although still quite usable.

Lenses / Re: New Canon 100-400mm Mk2 lens with 2x extender mk3
« on: January 07, 2015, 12:40:45 AM »
Hi Burnfield,

With 2x, manual focus and turn IS off, or the image will be blurred.

Please post pics, with 2x, 1.4x and without TC for us :-)

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Yongnuo 35mm f/2 Canon Clone on the Way
« on: January 05, 2015, 01:55:33 AM »
Does it take TC's? If not .......... I am selling all my Canon gear and moving to Nikon.  :P

Lenses / Re: DANGIT! I rented the 85 1.2ii
« on: December 23, 2014, 02:53:40 PM »
Get it.... Don't think. My 70-200m.ii only comes out when i need the reach. Before it was semi permanently mounted on the body.

Lenses / Re: How satisfied are you with the 100-400 II?
« on: December 23, 2014, 10:31:02 AM »
It has exceeded my expectations. Works great with the 1.4 TC M3.

This is exactly what I wanted to hear. Looking at TDP comps, it fares well against the tamron with 1.4x, but I am curious how it stacks up against the 2 Sigmas.

Software & Accessories / Re: HDR vs ML Dual ISO
« on: December 13, 2014, 02:55:51 PM »
I like the Dual ISO version myself. The HDR looks a bit overdone, especially the sky and the water below, weird yellow/ greenish cast.

By the way, where is this place? Its beautiful.

Great shots. Does that Road lead out of Jack's property?  ;)

EOS Bodies / Re: Another 50mp FF DSLR Mention [CR2]
« on: November 25, 2014, 10:02:17 AM »
It's far too early for a 5DMk4, Canon is not Nikon.

you know, a quick google would have told you how silly your post is.  5D was replaced in 3 years, 5dII in 3.5 years...

sept 2015 (next year) would be .. what? 3.5 years.

So am I cancelling my ebay listing or not?  :o

EOS Bodies / Re: Another 50mp FF DSLR Mention [CR2]
« on: November 25, 2014, 10:00:14 AM »
It's far too early for a 5DMk4, Canon is not Nikon.

Should I remove my ebay listing for my 5d3 then?  ::)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 105