September 19, 2014, 03:59:33 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - expatinasia

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 62
Lenses / Re: Canon 300mm f4 L lens: buy now or wait?
« on: March 18, 2014, 12:42:44 AM »
Doesn't something funny happen when you attach this lens to a tripod (maybe monopod too)? I seem to recall reading that it does not AF when attached or something.

I might be wrong though.

Works great on a Tripod.  The older design IS is not tripod sensing, so unless you have a cheap tripod and are getting a lot of movement, the IS being turned on while the lens is on a tripod can be a problem.

Thanks, you are right.

It was on TDP I read this: "Keep in mind that the version of IS on this lens needs to be turned off when tripod-mounted. Not doing so may cause the image stabilizer to act erratically."

I just ran it again three times with all settings turned off and just the body cap on the camera shooting RAW - 23 frames on the 1000x Lexar, 35 frames on the 1067x Sandisk.  This is the number of frames on the 5DIII before it begins slowing from the max frame rate.  Yes, you can keep shooting at a reduced frame rate and eventually it will slow even further, but I'm measuring (and interested in) the number of shots at full frame rate. 

Also, given these results, I can confirm that aberration correction, vignetting removal, and standard levels of high ISO noise reduction don't impact frame rate.

mack..I didn't leave the body cap on, I shot at a a fixed subject - large RAW - I'll also try it again and check back.   do you have image quality set at "10"


edit...I wonder if this is the reason for the diff....from Adorama website:

Lexar Pro 1000x 16GB UDMA 7 CF Specifications
Capacity   16GB
Read Speed   1000x (150MB/s)
Write Speed   Max 966x (145MB/s)
Compatibility   UDMA CF and CF devices

this would mean that there are two different lexar 1000x cards, both at 150 read, but with 95 and 145 write.

I started a thread about the Lexars as when I bought the ones I currently use they were advertised as write 145 MB/s write but if you look at them online now they say the 1000X is now only 95MB/s write, and if you want the 145 or 150MB/s write you need to buy the newer 1066X.

This only happened quite recently, so I wonder whether people that bought the 1000Xs some time ago have got 145MB/s write cards but those that bought them much more recently only have 95MB/s.

I just ordered a new 64GB card and nearly bought the 1000X, it was only when I noticed the 1066X that I noticed the difference, so I went for the latter.

It is very misleading by Lexar, because I - and many others here and elsewhere - have recommended the 1000X, but that was when they were 145MB/s write.

Lenses / Re: Canon 300mm f4 L lens: buy now or wait?
« on: March 18, 2014, 12:12:19 AM »
Doesn't something funny happen when you attach this lens to a tripod (maybe monopod too)? I seem to recall reading that it does not AF when attached or something.

I might be wrong though.

EOS Bodies / Re: 1DX Won't Power On
« on: March 17, 2014, 11:54:40 PM »
It has been 4 months since they did the product advisory fix for the mirror box lubrication- the sensor was nice and clean for about 3 months, then the typical spots began showing up again all over the sensor making shots with sky in them a nightmare to 'fix' via spot removal-

Yes, using same batteries- both are fully charged- but nothing happens when I turn camera on- no life in the camera at all.

And the two batteries are originals from Canon? Have you calibrated them?

Does sound very unusual. Did you buy the camera new, second hand? Grey market?

Lenses / Re: Thinking about this but wanting your thoughts....
« on: March 17, 2014, 11:16:49 PM »
I do like the 70-300 L but rarely use it for some reason, and am even considering whether to sell it or not.

If I were you, and considering what you said in your first post, I would either go for the 70-200 f/2.8 is ii or possibly even the 300L f/4. The 70-200 is an excellent lens, and f/2.8 can be very useful.

EOS Bodies / Re: 1DX Won't Power On
« on: March 17, 2014, 08:26:15 PM »
First the defective mirror box assembly, then We had to send our new cameras in for the 'fix' which was nothing ore than a Band-Aid via lubrication- now camera won't even power on, and apparently it has to do with their 'fix', either that or the 1DX is prone ot power problems right from the get go-

What did Canon say when you spoke to them?

I have not had any problems, and the "fix" issue seems like a very long time ago now. How long has it been since you sent your camera in for the fix and now?

Are you using original batteries?

Anyway, hope you get it sorted out. Best to call Canon.

Lenses / Re: How much will the new EF 800 f/5.6L IS II cost?
« on: March 17, 2014, 08:20:36 PM »
Well now there are two votes over US$ 21,000. Wonder if I should have added more options?!

You do not necessarily need to be famous to have assistants. You just need to hire...
So true, and if you can afford it - why not!

Video & Movie / Re: Solo Twenty-Four
« on: March 17, 2014, 10:13:42 AM »
What a terrific video. Really, well done and I hope you are proud as that is excellent work.

Thx. But a member already beat you to this and that thread going strong. :)

This happens a lot - as I am sure you have noticed too. Never understood why.

EOS Bodies / Re: Calumet Photo Files Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
« on: March 17, 2014, 09:14:31 AM »
I once ordered a 70-200 F4 L IS lens from these guys. Shortly after ordering, I found a practically brand new one locally off Craigslist for way cheaper.  So I asked for and was granted a return by Calumet. I shipped my completely unopened packaged right back to them (I didn't even open the Calumet packaging, let alone the Canon packaging). Later on I checked my credit card online statement to see if I got refunded.

They did refund me.......and also charged me a $60 restocking fee for a package that I didn't even open.

If that's how they ran their business, I say Good Riddance!

So wait, you found a used (yeah, unopened and brand new) lens for cheaper.  So you sent back your order.  Doesn't matter if you opened it or not.  You bought it, you committed too it!!!!  Restocking fee's are there for a reason --- why --- because people do that!!!  Thrifty folks who say, wow, I could rent that lens for $XX per day - or - I could buy it and send it back within a month for less. 

Either way ---- we can't both complain that there are no longer brick and mortar stores, then screw those brick and mortar stores when we see something cheaper elsewhere.  Talk about reframing the arguement ---maybe it wasn't due to bad management --- maybe it was too many customers like you who screwed them...sorry if that's put it on a personal level...

Lets say you shoot portraits.  You book the client, they commit to a minimum price, you do the shoot, you make the edits, they pick their prints, you order their prints...   you deliver them even.  And 2 days later they call you and ask for a refund because they found someone down the street that was able to do it for cheaper?   How long are you going to stay in business with customers like that????

e-Honda was perfectly within his right to do what he did, and Calumet were in their right to charge. Neither can complain.

I was looking at extra batteries for the 1D X earlier on B&H, one of the customer review reads: "I ordered two LP-E4N Battery Packs From B&H. I chose B&H because they offered 2-day shipping and there competitor did not. The batteries arrived on time despite having the biggest snow storm of the year. We ended up going with a different camera for the shoot and no longer need the batteries so I had to return them. B&H made it so simple to return the items. I just applied for a refund and they got back to me very quickly then I dropped them off at the UPS store and my money was refunded the very same day. I look forward to doing business with them again soon."

Same thing really.

I can't watch the video as it is "not available in my area. Pity as Skye does look like a great place to visit, and I will be googling it more later as I may be in Scotland (first time) later this year.

However I never see sports photographers with assistants. I can't see where/how they would? Carrying their gear to the playing field?

I never see any of the photographers at the events I work at with assistants as such, some do have assistants or colleagues in the press room who edit the pics and upload etc others may be writing etc., but not assistants in the true sense of the word. They would be useful at all day events though, especially when you are in need of a meat pie or such like!

Lenses / Re: How much will the new EF 800 f/5.6L IS II cost?
« on: March 16, 2014, 09:22:20 PM »
How much for the Nikon 800?  Probably that much +10% Canon premium

The Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR Lens is $17,896.95 at B&H. And the most recent customer review of the lens reads: "I use it for landscape and wildlife. Nikon case and overall quality is excellent. The soft lens cap is the worst I have ever seen in 50 years of experience. It is hard to work with and does not seal well. I have replaced mine with a shower cap that is far superior in terms of cost, ease of use and effectiveness."

So don't throw away those unused shower caps, you just never know when they may come in handy!!

Wonder who voted over US$ 21,000!! And I wonder how much over he or she thinks it is going to cost!  :o

Lenses / How much will the new EF 800 f/5.6L IS II cost?
« on: March 16, 2014, 01:04:20 AM »
Today, the Canon EF 800 f/5.6L IS costs US$ 13,289 if you buy it from B&H. If a new version did come out, as a CR1 is reporting here: how much do you think it would cost?

Lenses / Re: Color of the 2x III
« on: March 16, 2014, 12:58:45 AM »
Mine are not exactly the same colour either. The extender is a little greyer. I think they have both always been like that though.

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 62