July 23, 2014, 04:18:16 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - castillophotodesign

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
31
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D Mark III + 24-70L II - Night Cityscape
« on: December 07, 2012, 08:23:11 AM »
Did you use a tripod? It's a stunning photo, you should be proud.

Yes, I did use a tripod. this was a 2 second exposure. Thank you!

32
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D Mark III + 24-70L II - Night Cityscape
« on: December 07, 2012, 08:21:46 AM »
Very nice...thanks for sharing ;)

Thanks brah!!!

33
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D Mark III + 24-70L II - Night Cityscape
« on: December 07, 2012, 08:20:39 AM »
HDR?

No HDR, this was a single exposure

34
5D MK III Sample Images / 5D Mark III + 24-70L II - Night Cityscape
« on: December 07, 2012, 08:02:00 AM »
here is a shoot I tooK yesterday with the 5D III & 24-70L II. Hope you Like it.

To see it large visit my flickr page http://www.flickr.com/photos/castillophotodesign/8250305211/#


20121206_untitled_6754-Edit.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr

35
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 II + 2X converter versus 100-400 f/4.5-5.6
« on: December 06, 2012, 01:17:11 PM »
I had the 70-200 2.8L IS II and stacked a 2x and 1.4x converter and was getting sharper images than my 100-400L on a 7D. I sold the 100-400. Not long after that, the rest was stolen. Grrrr...


That is strange i own both the 70-200L II, 1.4x Mark III and the 2X Mark III. I recently purchased a 100-400 because the shots with 2X and the 70-200 not sharp enough for me, not to mention how slow the autofocus performs. I dont know if my 2x is defective, but i find the shots of the 100-400 to be much sharper then the 70-200 and the 2X. I think the 70-200 with the 1.4X has better IQ then the 100-400 but as soon as you put that 2X on the 70-200 the 100-400 is better in my opinion (both in IQ and focus speed).

here are some sample shots with the 100-400 i took today


20121206_untitled_6609.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr


20121206_untitled_6644.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr


20121206_untitled_6653.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr


36
Lenses / Re: Advice 5d3, wide angle
« on: November 15, 2012, 08:04:46 PM »
why isnt anybody talking about the tokina 16-28? I have the same dilema and i am seriously considering the tokina, and not only because of the price. I have owned two 17-40 and one 16-35 L II, i didnt like em so i sold them. Would the tokina be a good option?

38
later that same night...


panoramic_KeyBiscayne.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr

39
Here is another one with the same combo  ;D


5R5C2352-Edit.jpg by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr

40
i love your photography.. it inspires me.. =)

Thank You, I appreciate it!

42
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon TS-E 24 f/3.5L II
« on: October 05, 2012, 01:37:02 PM »
i have a question maybe someone can help me out. is the version I of this lens any good? is it a lot less sharp? why is version II so much better? about how much would you pay for a  used version I? Thank you!!!

43
5D MK III Sample Images / Sunny Isles stunning reflections with 5DIII & 50L
« on: September 27, 2012, 12:15:03 PM »
Right from my backyard, it was crazy. the wind stop blowing for like a minute, I grabbed my camera really quick and took the picture. Right after i took the picture the wind started blowing again and all the reflections were gone


Sunny Isles reflection - EDIT by CastilloPhotoDesign, on Flickr

44
Lenses / Re: New 24-70 L II - something wrong with mine? is this normal?
« on: September 25, 2012, 11:16:27 AM »
this happens from 24mm to 40mm and it gets progressively better :'( the rest of the frame is nice and sharp even the left edge

45
Lenses / Re: New 24-70 L II - something wrong with mine? is this normal?
« on: September 25, 2012, 10:52:40 AM »
look at this Aprox 100% crop. the left side is much more sharp


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9