March 04, 2015, 03:42:43 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - stefsan

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9
61
Canon General / Re: Why did you choose Canon?
« on: January 27, 2013, 04:08:45 AM »
When I started working as a journalist for a local newspaper almost 20 years ago, all the other reporters and photographers were working with Canon gear. So I got myself a Canon EOS 100. Since then it's pretty much a case of path dependency: Once you invest in a system (lenses, accessories etc.), it gets more and more costly to change. Therefore I still am a Canon shooter. And with the 5DIII they built kind of a dream body for my needs. I only have to find the funds to get it and some accompanying lenses – and I will continue to be a happy Canon user.

62
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: January 17, 2013, 10:40:21 AM »
Great. After lens envy and body envy, I now got location envy. Badly.

+1  :P

63
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D weatherproofness, tested.
« on: January 15, 2013, 07:20:13 AM »
I would not do with my 7D what that crazy military guy did with his Pentax cameras but I never had any troubles with shooting in heavy snow fall or light to medium rain (7D + ef-s 15-85/ef 70-200 f4 L) over shorter periods of time (up to 15 minutes). I would be VERY careful about changing lenses in those conditions though (best not to change them at all).

64
Software & Accessories / Re: Snowboarding with a DSLR
« on: January 14, 2013, 09:19:02 AM »
PS: Maybe you want to check out http://www.cottoncarrier.com/ too – they produce a camera vest that allows you to carry your camera safely but ready for shooting on your breast. Not very cheap either but rather thought through and very reliable.

65
Software & Accessories / Re: Snowboarding with a DSLR
« on: January 14, 2013, 09:13:42 AM »
Can anyone recommend a well padded rucksack for either of this lot:

Canon 5d MK III gripped or 7D

17 - 40 F4 L + maybe a 70 - 200 F4

I would like to take one of these bodies snowboarding but as you can imagine I am pretty sketchy about smashing an LCD screen. Has anyone found any methods of securing their DSLRs whilst snowboarding. I wouldn't attach a lens whilst in the bag to reduce damage that way and I would ideally like to have some form of ruck sac bag with a camera body + lenses in. Some of you will probably call me mad but at the end of the day if that's what it takes to get the photos...

I regularly use fstop backpacks (http://fstopgear.com/) for skiing and mountaineering. They work with padded internal camera units and will hold a lot of other stuff than your photo gear too (extra clothing, food etc.). Not cheap but well worth the money.

66
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: January 14, 2013, 09:05:51 AM »
NASA doesn't send people into space any more. This is irrelevant

They still send people to the International Space Station – they only need to hitch a ride with the russians. But I doubt that this influenced their choice of camera brand…  ;)

67
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon DSLR Body Rumors for 2013
« on: January 04, 2013, 04:33:03 AM »

but they'd better get rid of the banding and pattern noise problems for both new bodies, especially at low ISO. It's become a pathetic weakness already when competitors' cameras costing under $400, like the ultra tiny Pentax Q or D5100, can supply raw images without banding problems.

+ 1

The banding noise in many pictures from my 7D (even the region of ISO 400) is one of the most important reasons for me wanting to upgrade to the 5DIII

68
Have a look at www.blurb.com, I think they have everything you need.

69
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon brochure library
« on: January 01, 2013, 05:31:07 AM »
Very handy, thanks for posting!

70
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR1]
« on: December 27, 2012, 08:10:26 AM »
Found on an German IT-news page:

Maybe interresting: Fast, good image quality.

http://www.golem.de/news/aufloesung-und-geschwindigkeit-canon-7d-mark-ii-fuer-sport-und-landschaftsfotografen-1212-96081.html

The article is actually nothing more than a collection of RUMORS from CR and Northlight but selling them like an official Canon press release…  ???

71
1994: Canon EOS 100 (still in use, occasionally)
2006: Canon PowerShot A710 IS (got stolen)
2007: Canon EOS 400D (felt too toy-like in my hands, sold)
2007: Canon EOS 40D (I really liked the feel of that camera, serves now as backup body)
2007: Canon Powershot G7 (for concerts were DSLRs are not allowed and some everyday snapping, still in use)
2010: EOS 7D (a great step up from the 40D, will become my 2nd body as soon as funds allow for a 5DIII)

72
Contests / Re: Gura Gear Giveaway!
« on: December 07, 2012, 02:41:51 AM »
I'd like to win too! Pretty please?  :D

73
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Upgrade from 40D or upgrading lenses
« on: December 06, 2012, 09:58:38 AM »
As someone who went from the 40D to the 7D I would say it definitely was a worthwhile upgrade. Although noise levels even at moderately high ISO settings are considerably high, I quite like the overall image quality of the 7D – better than the already good 40D. Resolution, AF, speed and ergonomics are far better in the 7D. But if you are after a camera with superb image quality especially in low light/high ISO situations, you'd probably be better off with a 5DII.

74
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Skiing picture advice
« on: December 05, 2012, 05:33:19 AM »
If you're planning on action shots you might want to have a look at Dan Carr's blog: http://theskiphotographer.com/ There you can get some useful advice for setting up and exposing ski action shots.

75
1. Canon EF 14mm f2.8L II
2. Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L II
3. Canon EF  24-70mm f2.8L II
4. Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L II IS
5. 400mm f2.8L II IS (+ Extender EF 1.4x III)

And if I still had money left I would also like

6. Canon TS-E 17mm f4L
7. Canon MP-E 65mm f2.8 1-5x Macro
8. Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9