September 20, 2014, 06:25:50 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - preppyak

Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 52
601
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Full Specifications
« on: June 07, 2012, 02:43:03 PM »
By the way, the prominent ISO button... I think this is a bit too much for most rebel buyer, isn't it? And the video switch, let's hope it won't be tripped too easily.
The button layout on the back is the exact same as the T3i, and the only change on top is that the ISO button moves left as they got rid of the Display on/off button.

Is there supposed to be a press conference?  If so I'm guessing that's when they would say something?
Believe its tomorrow, so we'd know for sure then. Im not sure anyone can know for sure until then, since a spec list won't clarify new sensor or not

602
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Touchscreen Example Videos
« on: June 07, 2012, 02:36:27 PM »
Being able to quickly select your focus point using the touchscreen as opposed to having to scroll around is helpful imo.

Same goes for accessing anything on the menu screens. The fewer button presses the better imo.

Although the magnify button might be just as fast and more accurate than performing a gesture zoom in.

It's just nice to have the touchscreen capability there for some things imo. Each person will find their own benefits.
Yeah, for most uses you'll actually find the buttons and wheel easier for changing exposure settings than a touch-screen, especially since that touch screen requires you to take your eye off what you are photographing. But, when you're already using the screen, it'll be pretty nice.

603
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Full Specifications
« on: June 07, 2012, 02:20:06 PM »
Or is the ISO performance improved on this body by using DIGIC V+?
It's possible it will help the video out some, simply by being able to process faster and allowing for higher-res recording. I wouldn't expect any big difference in noise performance for video though.

Based on your needs, the video AF could be nice if it actually works. While the 10-20 won't really need it, other lenses can use it. And even with the 10-20, while you're running along with a glidecam, it'd be nice not to have to worry about focusing. Biggest feature for you, if you also take pictures, would be the AF and FPS. Makes it more likely you lock focus and get a cool shot in action.
So if there is no new sensor in terms of quality I am going to get the same as the t2i... :o
But the most important thing is the image quality!! Surely that should improve in an upgrade..
Would have been nice to see an upgrade sensor, but IQ doesn't mean anything if your shot is out of focus, or you missed the moment. The AF will be a noticeable upgrade from the T3i, and the burst rate will also be a noticeable upgrade. Since many rebel users are people shooting their families and people running around, those are important. And most of them wouldn't notice the difference between an 18mp sensor or a 22mp sensor, except that maybe they'd need a slightly larger hard-drive with the larger sensor

604
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Full Specifications
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:41:25 PM »
The 7DII will recieve a New AF System and Possibly... Just maybe... APS-H. <---- Ace in the Hole vs D600 Nikon.
The D600 is, by rumors, a full-frame camera that is a lower MP, crippled version of the D800. Kind of like a better 5dII if you would. And the 7dII would be an improvement over the 7D. So how is an awesome APS-C camera an ace in the hole against a cheap full-frame camera? Completely different set of users.

I do agree it bodes well for the 70D getting some useful upgrades, seeing as the T4i is currently on par with the 60D on everything but build quality.

605
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Full Specifications
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:39:15 PM »
Price guess?
$949 or $999 with the 18-55 kit would be my guess. Take $100 for body-only. T4i with the new 18-135 would probably be $1199, it's usually a $200-250 price premium over the kit lens combo

606
Suggestions would be nice haha.
To record to your laptop, you'd have to get a cord that goes from the soundboard to your laptop. Depends on the soundboard whether that would be XLR or 1/4" jacks. You'll have to contact them in advance to figure that out. Ultimately you need a converter that takes it from that size down to standard headphone size. Something like these

http://www.amazon.com/Inch-Stereo-Jack-3-5Mm-Adapter/dp/B001JYTM96/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1339085773&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Hosa-XVS101F-Right-Angle-3-5mm/dp/B000068NZG/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1339085791&sr=1-2

Of course, those would go on the end of the cord coming out of the soundboard...and then into your computer. A program like Audacity would be fine for recording the audio. You could do the same thing going direct to your cameras (same 3.5mm jack), but obviously when you stopped recording you'd lose audio.

If you're going to do this often, I'd just buy an external audio recorder, it will be simpler than using your laptop every time (since your laptop will have to be plugged in, etc)

607
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: T4i continuous Video AF, CDAF or PDAF?
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:13:08 PM »
the down side is, aperture has to be wide open, but if you want full control, you lose continuous AF, so not both....
That seems like a silly solution for AF. And if the lens is wide open, do you mean it would shoot at f/1.8 on your primes all the time? Cause I would imagine that would get old fast, especially if I wanted more DOF. Or is it the other way around, where it always shoots at f/11 (which would make it no better than your standard camcorder)?

Either way, the inability to control the settings manually would be a deal breaker for me

608
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:08:19 PM »
STM point to a future mirrorless system
How does STM point to mirror-less? It points towards silent focus for video...but, that can be useful on any type of body.

The pancake form would point to mirror-less, but, the fact it's EF mount might mean its just a marketing choice.

609
EOS Bodies / Re: where to sell canon gear, I'm moving to Nikon
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:05:51 PM »
canon will have a 30mpx 3D out in 3monthes, and 1dxmk2, 36mpx in 6 monthes, nikon and canon are about the same! you will sell all your lens and lose money, i would think about it!!
Haha, I love that you think they'll have the 1DXmk2 out before they might even have the original 1DX out.

And if someone wants the D800, a 30mp 3D that costs $5k might not be worth them sticking with Canon. And of course, its a theoretical camera that may or may not ever exist.

610
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 11:39:03 AM »
Here:
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A//digicame-info.com/2012/06/ef40mm-f28-stmef-s18-135mm-f35.html%0A
Impressive. Wouldn't have expected FTM from this lens.

Sure hope $200 wins the pool!
The rumors to this point have been $200 or <$200, but obviously we'll see. A <$200 lens that does FTM and has better aperture blades than the 50mm f/1,8 would have be kind of surprising...since their other lens announcements have been less affordable relative to what they offer

611
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 11:33:41 AM »
Three things better than 50mm 1.8:
-  Full time manual focus
- 7 circular blades =  great bokeh!
Can you source either of those details? I don't see it in any of the previous rumors on the lens that it would have FTM or any details regarding blades, etc.

612
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 11:26:09 AM »
Forgive my ignorance, but what's special about this? It's only 10mm wider than the 50 and a stop slower.  :-\
The STM would, presumably, make the auto-focus during video very quiet. NOW this lens makes sense. The 18-135 covers your general video use, but for someone who wants lower-light handling while shooting video (but still AF), they could use this. Whereas the AF for the 35mm f/2 and 50mm f/1.8 are loud and will destroy your audio.

Still makes it a silly lens, but, at least it makes sense

613
Lenses / Re: Canon EF-S 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Information
« on: June 07, 2012, 10:51:54 AM »
quiet and tender while shooting video
Ha, that translation is great.

614
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Specifications
« on: June 07, 2012, 10:45:02 AM »
Not much for the stills shooter.
The AF being improved is pretty big for still shooters. And the 5fps in shooting. It's basically a 60D now, in a T3i body.

Considering what little there was from the T2i to T3i transition, this is a much nicer upgrade for camera users.

615
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650 Touchscreen Information
« on: June 07, 2012, 10:41:51 AM »
This could actually end up being pretty cool...hadn't thought of it being an easier way to set AF points.

Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 52