August 01, 2014, 09:53:35 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wickidwombat

Pages: 1 ... 216 217 [218] 219 220 ... 296
3256
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III is in-stock!!
« on: March 15, 2012, 12:44:21 AM »
with that price better off just ordering from leederville camerahouse at $3599 and get the canon oz warranty

3257
This post triggered another question: what is happening if the lens in the kit has an issue ?
Do you have to send back the entire kit to the store (B&H for example) or just the defecting lens?
just take the lens in

3258
8) 8) 8) This is a feature of the 5diii I'm keen to experiment with :)


 Me too. I have a funny relationship with HDR... I like it, but it doesn't seem to like me very much. The funny thing is that every time I do a series of test shots (say, of my front yard) the HDR works beautifully. Whenever I try to do a serious HDR shot it always turns out terrible. I think photomatix is trolling me.

I've posted this alot
http://goodlight.us/
have a look at this guys tutorials his method kills the trash compacting softwarelike photomatix etc
I'll be honest first time you read through its intimidating but he sells his actions for $20 which is nothing really but he also teaches you how to make your own if you dont want to buy them. It takes a few rea throughs to get the concepts of what he is doing but the benfits as I see it are
- you have total control over the blending of exposure at various places of the tonal range and image. so you can leave certain shadow areas if you choose for effect, this makes the image seem less flat and cartoon like
more real.
- its self feathering so you dont have to be super precise with your brush strokes
- its totally clean no loss of image quality and softening of the image giving that fuzzy look, halos,
- no introduced noise (photomatix is appaling for this, take clean iso 100 images and after processing it has more noise than iso 3200 native
- more control over colours tones and contrast. I hate the oversaturation that most cookie cutter software excretes.

hope that helps :)

3259
Lenses / Re: Tilt-Shift Lens vs. Macro Slide Rail
« on: March 14, 2012, 11:57:28 PM »
You want options?  Here is a whole page of options:

http://www.stitchpix.com/options.html

I am looking at the same question myself but have not settled on which way to go yet, though both the Zork and Novoflex look about right.


I use novoflex gear, its top shelf quality but expensive as hell

I also have the gigapan epic pro which i dont use nearly as much as i would like to :(

3260
EOS Bodies / Re: The Megapixels are Coming [CR1]
« on: March 14, 2012, 11:20:17 PM »
Agreed jrsta

since the TC are added to the lens the MP remain the same
the change would be the net resolving power of the lens + TC will drop
resulting in a somewhat lower lp/mm value for the combined optic with a tighter AoV

3261
Well this is pretty much all I needed to see. Apparently I'm about to become a Nikon-shooter.

The only thing I will really miss is my 70-200 2.8 IS II, but I have heard that Nikon's version is equal in IQ.

yeah I wouldnt worry about that, also check out the 50mm f1.4G its a great value for money lens it was my nikon favourite

3262
Lenses / Re: Lens Recommendations - Crop (7D) to Full Frame (5dMk3)?
« on: March 14, 2012, 11:12:05 PM »
I'll probably come across as a heretic to all the 16-35 owners... but I have the 17-40 f/4 L and I highly recommend it.  I don't think a superwide really suits portraits that well; longer focal lengths seem to do that better, particularly between 50 and 100mm. You seem to have those lengths covered pretty well. The superwide is really better geared towards landscapes, in which case you're almost always stopped down to f/8 or lower so you'd rarely if ever need the 2.8 for landscape shooting. Just my two cents.
all valid points
that is why i prefer to use the 16-35 II on APS-H giving 21-49mm which is a really nice range for events and as a walk around, I prefer this approach to using 24-70 since it gives me near enough to 50mm on the long end and 21mm is Just that bit better than 24 on the wide end, also croping the corners means its sharp all over at f2.8 for events etc, colour and contrast is also stunning on this lens. I originally got it for landscapes but soon discovered it can do sooo much more than just that.
another massive benefit is its all internally zooming unlike the 24-70

3263
EOS Bodies / Re: 1d mk iv or 5d mkiii?
« on: March 14, 2012, 10:25:03 PM »
Yeah i'm leaning more towards holding onto my 5D II and 1D II and just purchasing a 1D III and i think i will be a happy camper for a year or two.  $1500 would be very do-able!

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-III-10-0-MP-Digital-SLR-Camera-Black-Body-Only-/280844395194?pt=AU_Digital_Cameras&hash=item4163a162ba
this one looks in top condition
I still use my mk 3 it complements the 5D2 nicely
I catually use the 16-35 f2.8 on the APS-H more than the FF becasue it gives me 21-49mm effective which for events at f2.8 is very nice, also wide open any corner softness is cropped off, then with either 70-200 f2.8 on the 5D2 or 85mm f1.4 on the 5D2 it gives great coverage for events across the 2 bodies
I cant wait for 1Dmk4 prices to come down more but at the moment they are still over double the mk3 prices

3264
17 coming in this month, this will clear most backorders, remaining stock will come Mid April, maybe earlier, we are taking orders again at $3599 with $500 deposits.

awesome I think I am in the 17 well I hope so since i go overseas mid april  :-\

3265
EOS Bodies / Re: The Megapixels are Coming [CR1]
« on: March 14, 2012, 10:07:01 PM »
I wonder what life would be like if Steve Jobs was involved with DLSR's?
then we wouldn't be able to save photos, only view them on the icloud at $1 per view

3266
EOS Bodies / Re: 5DM3 HDR Article
« on: March 14, 2012, 10:04:40 PM »
JPEG images only
For technical reasons, the EOS 5D Mark III's in-camera HDR Mode requires JPEG processing, and can only be done with bracketed JPEG shots. If they camera has been set to any of its RAW image settings, it will take the three bracketed "source" images as RAW files – but the finished, processed HDR image that results will be a Large (full-resolution) JPEG file. It's not possible for the final HDR image to be a .CR2 RAW file.

As expected its JPEG ONLY - so unfortunately gets relegated to gimmick category for me

3267
Price is back to $3599inc gst, there was an initial error, however with all the orders we put in with Canon Australia, we were able to keep the price as it was.
Awesome work!
any idea what date the pre-orders are going to be coming in?

3268
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 1D cameras for walk-around and traveling
« on: March 14, 2012, 07:55:42 PM »
The main difference between the 1Dx and the 5d3 is crazy fps and metering, and weather sealing.


Plus ... AF point-linked spot metering...


5DIII has point linked metering


Really?  Care to provide a reference for that?  Because the Canon USA 5D Mark III specs page states:

Metering Modes
Max. aperture TTL metering with 63-zone SPC with the following selectable modes:
(1)   Evaluative metering (linked to all AF points)
(2)   Partial metering (center, approx. 7.2% of viewfinder)
(3)   Spot metering (center, approx. 1.5% of viewfinder)
·AF point-linked spot metering not provided.


 :'(
damn got my hopes up that it might have spot metering AF linked

oh well

3269
Lenses / Re: Tilt-Shift Lens vs. Macro Slide Rail
« on: March 14, 2012, 07:40:23 PM »
Didn't take long for someone to hit the smite button did it?

I gave you an applaud to counteract it  :-*

3270
EOS Bodies / Re: 1d mk iv or 5d mkiii?
« on: March 14, 2012, 07:30:07 PM »
you should be able to get good used 1Dmk3 for around $1500 if you look around

Pages: 1 ... 216 217 [218] 219 220 ... 296