September 23, 2014, 06:48:38 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AvTvM

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 64
46
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 18, 2014, 06:24:58 PM »
Again, I'm not arguing for Canon/Nikon to avoid this market, but it makes some sense that they let this chaotic primordial ooze of a market evolve further before trying to conquer it.

there is nothing chaotic in the mirrorless market. Definitely less so than in the artificially crippled, "marketing-differentiated" world of DSLRs. Batteries, Battery grips, external WFT-Wifi bricks ... all of them totally incompatible even within one manufacturers line of cameras! Canon offering 5 different APS-C mirror-slappers in parallel - 1200D, 100D, 700D, 70D, 7D/7D II at the same time .. Nikon running 3 different APS-C DSLRs, all with the same sensor in parallel and moving towards 5 different FF DSLRs in parallel-  D610, D810, Df, D4s + one new rumored. And to make the mess even worse ... all of these grandfather-DSLRs "video-optimized", although mirrorless cams will always win the video game. Naturally. No mirror to be flapped out of lights' way all the time! :-)

Now where's the primordial ooze? The mess. The clunkiness. The mirror-slappin. Fat, greasy, old and heavy 19-century mechanical tech stuff?  Looks rather like Jurassic Park to me. Soon to go extinct. :P

47
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 18, 2014, 05:57:32 PM »
I strongly resent cameras with fixed lenses. Sony RX-1 ... bah, I'd never buy it. Even with a "bolted-on" zoom lens I'd feel narrowed in. I want to be able to change lenses if I and whenever I want to. Including usi9ng my 70-200/2.8 L IS II on my EOS-M at a concert. And put the TS-E 17/4 on that same EOS-M the next day when I am urbexing at some god-forsaken abandoned textile mill in the middle of nowhere.

There is no reason whatsoever to limit myself - or even worse - let others limit me to a 24-85 eq. FOV. :-)

Since Sony has proven, that a capable, full-frame mirrorless camera does not have to be any bigger than a mFT or APS-C one ... that's what I really want.

And btw. the mirrorless market (with lens mount) is no zoo, it is fairly simple. There are currently only four tiers to it,. and it will shrinkt to only two some time soon:

  • 1" ... Nikon 1 ... bound to die. Sensor too small. Only one player without much of clue. Dead end, stay away.
  • mFT - many players. also a dead end. Sensor too small relative to camera and lens size. Glass does not scale proportionately. Will be around for some years to come though. Enjoy it, while it lasts. Market leaders: Oly, Panasonic
  • APS-C ... very reasonable budget alternative. One stop less photographic opportuniities at significantly lower cost than FF. As in DSLRs. Will survive for many years to come. Clear market leader: Sony/E-Mount.
  • FF - 135 format. 36-24. Getting more affordable by the day. ANd really small. Inclduing nice pancakes that don't cost an arm and a leg. Clear market leader and innovator: Sony.

Rather simple, isn't it? :-)

Canon? So far ... nowhere. EOS-M a success due to fantastic, but totally unwanted price/value position. And thanks to APS-C lenses that are small, really good IQ and dirt cheap. Hang in there and clamor for more and better things to come (bodies!) :-)

48
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 18, 2014, 12:30:45 PM »
Nothing can stop mirrorless. Only open question is how fast it's goint to happen. Some DSLRs will be avalaible for a long time, similar to MF cameras todays and vinyl records.

It makes no sense whatsoever to "protect" DSLR sales by NOT offering the most attractive possible mirrorless camera systems. Economies are much better for mirrorless bodies. They can be produced quite a bit cheaper than correspondingly featured DSLRs [due to lack of mechanical elements needing very careful alignment and adjustment] .. but can be sold at rather similar prices. For that reason alone mirrorless will succeed. :-)

If Canon does not start to offer these soon and "in earnest", they will loose out. Including FF (135 format) sensors and lenses.  No matter what their analysts may say. Others will offer these cameras and there will be market share losses.

Yes, a 70-200/2.8 will always be a fairly sizeable lens. But most amateurs and pro's do not NEED a 70-200/2.8 ALL THE TIME. When more than 300mm focal length are used - especially with a fast tele lens, it is more often than not used on a tripod/gimbal or on a monopod. A small camera body will not hurt handling then ... all that's reuqired is to shift the lens-camera combination a bit backwards on the Arca plate attached to the lens collar foot to get it nicely into balance on the pivot point.  :-)

49
Canon General / Re: A Rundown of EOS 7D Mark II Information
« on: August 18, 2014, 11:25:39 AM »
Thanks Danuiela. I believe that perfectly describes current Canon thinking. However, as opposed to Canon and their analysts I am convinced this ignorance and arrogance towards their customers will cost them dearly.

I have purchased hardly anything from Canon during the last 5 years (7D) and will continue to do so, as long as they do not deliver the products I want [basically, a mirrorless "Sony A7R killer" or at the very least a "Fuji XT-1 killer" (APS-C)]. I've recently sold the 7D and some of the Canon lenses and have no qualms to sell the remaining approx. 5k in Canon lenses, if need be.

Yes, that's just me ... but I know, it is not just me. :-)

Information from Japanese Canon fan girls, who are working @Canon:

Information about the successor of the 7D and the 5DIII are under total NDA. And total means total. There is just an small circle of engeneers and managers who know all of these Cameras. Others are just working on fragments of this Cameras to avoid leaks. If anyone says, he knows details on these products, he is not telling the truth.
In earlier times print jobs for tranportation and manuals were given to the printeries weeks before announcement. This time, there ist still just printing time reservated. No files have been sent to them (status from 08/12).

Canon is still thinking that they do not have to produce the best and most innovative products in the low and mid price segments. Sales figures show that the market analysts are right. Canon is still the best power seller on the market. And the analysts know that in future time, the market wil not grow and other brands are coming in. Sony will be very active, maybe an 5DIII and 1DX mirrorless competitor is coming in the near future.
The slow reaction on the D7100 and the still "no reaction" on the excellent D800/810 is well calculated. No need to hurry, Canon products are still sold well. There are not many persons switching to Nikon, because the majority of Canonians will not be able to spend a lot of money on new expensive lenses. The average Canon customer will be satisfied by new Canon products, even if other brands will produce superior products.

And the rumored prices of the 7D successor are just rumors. Some Canon fans in Japan think that there will be an hefty price increase on Canon products on coming products. Analysts say, that customers are willed to pay the increase. The increasing number of tests and scores, where Canon products are often just a few points /percents better than e.g. third party lenses, will prompt the average (and scores fixed) Canon fan to buy this "bettert product".
If you can see that in their pictures? I do not know.

50
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 18, 2014, 11:16:16 AM »
But buying an EOS-M and then slapping an adaptor on it is a fail.  The killer app for this system is size, and when you bolt the old mirror box distance back on, what's the point?

The point is very simple. I want ONE fully capable camera system only. ONE battery type, ONE charger. ONE lens mount. ONE user interface to learn and know by heart and blindfolded. 

Whenever possible, I like to go really small and light. Small and light camera body plus one or a few small + light  native short-flangeback lenses. I am willing to limit myself to and including 200mm on APS-C [witness the EF-M 55-200] or about 85mm focal length on FF.

Only ocassionally my shooting situations will require larger gear. Either studio (lights) or events in darkish places (speedlites plus fast glass), or a "longish tele" [in my case max. 400mm] or a Tilt-Shift or some other more "special" lens (fisheye 8-15, 100 Macro etc.],

In many of these shooting situations - especially with larger lenses) I also carry along and use a tripod and have my DSRLs in LiveView mode. So I do not use or need any of the mirror or OVF. I would be much better served by a small and light mirrorless camera. Especially if it had a fully electronic shutter without any vibrations and any noise. Plus EVF. E.g. for use at concerts (classical music).

I have no need whatsoever for a mirrorslappin' DSLR ... IF and when I get a fully capable (FF-sensored, 6fps, tracking AF as good as or better than Sony A6000 Fuji XT-1) small and light mirrorless camera. I'd be willing to bridge the time until then with a really good Canon EOS M3 ("Pro") with APS-C sensor.

51
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon mirrorless: Status?
« on: August 18, 2014, 10:59:58 AM »
Canon hopefully have learned their lesson. Do NOT bring sub-par specced gear (EOS-M) to market, asking WAY TOO HIGH PRICES for it (EOS-M).

I definitely expect an
* EOS M3
body size like EOS-M2, AF as good as Sony A6000/5100, sensor equal, Wifi built in, flash built-in priced competitively [i.e. around USD/€ 650 including EF-M 18-55] 
plus additionally
* a much better specced EOS M "Pro 1"
with kick-butt 7D II sensor, mirrorless class-leading DP-AF, fully articulated touch-screen 1920x1080 Full-HD res, WiFI, GPS and RT-Commander built in; 4k video like pany GH4, body size slightly smaller than Fuji XT-1, 1 thumb/select wheel in back, plus 1 dial close to shutter, priced competitively at around USD/€ 1299,-
any time soon.


Followed somewhat later by the announcement of the Canon FF EOS XL1" and "XL 3" mirroless cams plus new short-back lens mount Canon EF-XL and initial native lens selection of 24-70/4.0 plus pancake set of 20/2.8, 50/1.8 and 75/2.8.   8)  8)  8)

Guess, which one I will pre-order! :-)

52
Canon General / Re: A Rundown of EOS 7D Mark II Information
« on: August 18, 2014, 04:25:19 AM »
All i care about is images ... And i know, i cannot get such images with the 7D or the EOS-M and also not with a Canon 6D or 5D3 or 1D-X.

Then why do I see similar images from those cameras all the time? Browse a photo sharing site some time.

Well, I have shot myself and seen enough images from all sorts of current Canon EOS cameras ... and NONE of them can deliver these kind of images out of cam / without REALLY HEAVY post processing. 


http://aboutphotography-tomgrill.blogspot.co.at/
Quote
Exceptional dynamic range, from the bright window to the deep shadows with no noise and smooth tonal trasition. No fill was added to this severely back lit shot.




53
Canon General / Re: A Rundown of EOS 7D Mark II Information
« on: August 18, 2014, 01:30:39 AM »
I don't care at all about DXO. And I don't care whether it's called "DR", "photographic DR" or "latitude".
I do care about images ... and i know, I cannot get images like in the following link (Nikon D810 review) from my 7D or the EOS-M and also not from a Canon 6D or 5D3 or 1D-X or any other Canon EOS.

Here goes:
http://aboutphotography-tomgrill.blogspot.co.at/2014/08/nikon-d810-hands-on-review.html?m=1

BEcause I (greatly) prefer the Canon user interface, I would like to get this type of IQ and "DR" from a Canon EOS ... preferably mirrorless FF camera the size and weight if a Sony A7.

And I don't care, whether it is called 5D IV, 6D II, EOS-M Pro or whatever. As long as they bring it to market at competitive prices = somewhere between Alpha 7R and Nikon D810  ;D

54
Canon General / Re: A Rundown of EOS 7D Mark II Information
« on: August 15, 2014, 12:55:57 PM »
"Serious" videographers should not clamor for freaking video-optimized crap in stills cameras, especially not in DSLRS with a mirror in the lightpath. They should go buy a panasonic GH4 if they are poor or a Sony A7S if they want "full frame/shallow DOF" or a canon C-something if they want a video-optimized camera or if they really dont mind the mirror and want FF plus 4k, then a canon EOS 1D-C ... if they are not so poor. An APS-C DSLR is by its very nature the least suitable video-recording device. So stay away from it.

I hope the 7D successor comes without any video-recording capabilities whatsoever. A lean and mean STILLS machine.

55
EOS Bodies / Re: Plan B
« on: August 14, 2014, 01:01:05 PM »
use EOS-M only. Buy 11-22. Sell all my EF-S lenses except 60 Macro.  :-) 

56
EOS Bodies / Re: A Bit of EOS 7D Replacement Info [CR2]
« on: August 13, 2014, 03:50:37 PM »
As long as canon and all other digicam makers are able to put wifi and gps into quite a number of measly and cheap 1/1.7" and 1/2.3" dwarf-sensored compact and bridge cams .. Powershots, elphs, coolpix ... And are able to get regulatory approvals for those pieces of junk around the world ... There is no excuse on earth for not putting wifi, gps and rt flash commander into every single dslr they make.

57
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Dual Pixel Phase Detect AF While in AI Servo
« on: August 12, 2014, 02:02:03 PM »
1. I see a mirror flapping in that patent.
2. To me it looks like a feedback loop for automatic, in-camera "AF-Micro-Adjustment".

I do not se anything directly linked to dual-pixel AF [automatic AFMA for DSLR-phase-detect AF-unit could be achieved with any sort of additional in-sensor plane AF ... CD-AF and/or PD-AF] nor to improved Servo-Tracking performance. And I also fail to see how this patent might improve AF-capabilities of *mirrorless* cameras.

As much as I am looking forward to the demise of the flapping mirror, too.  ;D

58
EOS Bodies / Re: A Bit of EOS 7D Replacement Info [CR2]
« on: August 12, 2014, 02:13:42 AM »
... The 7D owners expect a certain level of durability with the 7DII, but having wifi and gps or touchscreen appeals to more people than a camera that lacks basic features. Most people don't need an indestructible body but just a solid, well built one. The inclusion of wifi and touch screen won't hurt that.
I think Canon is f***ing stupid if that is true.

+1000

Exactly why I bought the original 7D on the first day it became available.
* VERY GOOD image quality (class-leading at the time!)
* VERY DECENT build quality (on-par with Nikon / D300/s; and still very good by today's standards; the few who really need more, should buy 1D series) 
* DECENT FEATURE SET (including pop-up flash working as wireless commander; only Auto-ISO was sub-par already back in 2009)
* VERY GOOD AF (at the time),
* EXCELLENT Controls / User Interface
* and equally important: SENSIBLE PRICE

For those very reasons the 7D was a major win for Canon. I fully expect Canon to deliver again, after having taken more than two regular development cycles to come up with the successor.

In 2014 this would translate into the following
* best IQ of any APS-C on the market today ... bar none ... and on all counts: resoultion, low-ISO noise/banding, Hi-ISO noise/banding ... and DR ... and highest DXO score ever recorded for an APS-C camera ;-) 
* 9+ fps plus top-notch AF system -> not just some form of live-view dual-pixel-AF ... but rather: speed, precision, tracking performance at LEAST as good as 5D III
* class-leading feature set, of course including WiFi, GPS and RT-radio flash commander. THEN they may dispose of the pop-up flash.
* OUTSTANDING controls/user interface ... including fully articulated RETINA TOUCH LCD with gorilla glass ... on par at least with iPhone 5, if not 6. ANd AUto-ISO implementation as good as 1DX or even better: as on Nikon D800
* DECENT price: MAX. USD/€ 2299,- at launch, street price quickly dropping to 1999,- for X-Mas/season sales

Should Canon fail to deliver on just one of these counts for the 7D successor, it will not sell in numbers. :-)

59
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Another Nikon full-frame
« on: August 11, 2014, 03:42:46 PM »
Whether or not nikon will be expanding its lineup to a total of 5 tired old FF mirrorslappers or not. And whether Canon will or should do so too. Rather than finally launching a top-notch mirrorless FF camera system and enter the era of smaller, lighter and more capable camera gear. :-)

60
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Another Nikon full-frame
« on: August 11, 2014, 12:53:42 PM »
internet chatter vs. the real world, sales numbers of the 5DIII vs. Nikon D800 etc. etc.

Neuro does not have those either. He inducts those solely based on ever changing Amazon.com (US) sales rankings. :o  ;D

I´d really LOVE to see total # of units sold for specific camera models (by year or at least runnind total since start). Unfortunately Canon and Nikon have not disclosed them to me either.  ;D

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 64