Messages

1366

Lenses / Re: 50mm 1.2

« on: May 21, 2012, 01:05:17 AM »

I wanted to purchase a 50mm 1.2 but wanted to know if a new 50mm will be coming out soon. Putting budget aside, would you get a 50mm 1.2 or a 1.4?

This lens is 3-4yrs old. You might not see mrk II anytimes soon here. If you already decided to go for L, I think should should go for it, since Canon is offering $120 rebate end June 2nd.

I was in this situation many times; the L or 1.4???  I tested both lenses side by side. At the end I decided to stay with 1.4 --- this is the only lens left in my bag that doesn't have a red ring

My reason is simple, the IQ on L is not 3-times better than 1.4. I was hoping 2 times better, not even. I say 1.35 to 1.5 better. The ONLY thing I like MOST about the L is build quality. Very solid.

1367

Lenses / Re: B+W Filters compared to Promaster Filters?

« on: May 19, 2012, 10:29:31 AM »

Stay with B&W. I have B&W Clear filters on my lenses.

1368

EOS Bodies / Canon Vs Nikon in Hollywood

« on: May 18, 2012, 05:14:34 PM »

Canon Vs Nikon plus others in hollywood:

1369

EOS Bodies / Re: What to do?

« on: May 18, 2012, 05:12:58 PM »

Canon Vs Nikon & others in Hollywood.

1370

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Specs [CR2.5]

« on: May 17, 2012, 03:04:19 PM »

No more manual focus on video? I'm interested

Here's what you'll get

https://vimeo.com/23745431

Note that that is shot with probably f/11 or higher, so it doesn't even have much focus hunting to do. But, it still sounds awful and isn't that impressive. Take a shot with lower light and an aperture more like f/4, and its pretty unusable

https://vimeo.com/23943236

If Canon had solved those issues in some brilliant or ingenious way, they'd have put it in the 5dIII. That they are just leaving it to the T4i tells me all I need to know....it would have made pros angry since its not very good.

Thanks for the links

1371

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Point & Shoot?...

« on: May 17, 2012, 01:48:48 PM »

S100...small & takes decent pics under low light.

My last business trip in China with S100.

1372

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Specs [CR2.5]

« on: May 17, 2012, 01:45:22 PM »

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9910"></g:plusone></div><div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin: 0 0px 0 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9910" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9910"></a></div>
<strong>The Next Rebel<br />


</strong>I received a good bit of info about the next Rebel. I put it at CR2.5 just until I receive a bit more confirmation.</p>
<p>An announcement is slated for June.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS Rebel 650D/T4i</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>18mp (no word on whether or not its a new or modified 18mp sensor)</li>
<li>9 AF Points, all cross-type</li>
<li>Touchscreen LCD</li>
<li>Continuous AF in LiveView & Video Recording</li>
<li>June Announcement</li>
</ul>
<p><em>thanks</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

No more manual focus on video? I'm interested

1373

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D II/24-70L II OR 5D III/24-70L

« on: May 17, 2012, 12:24:36 PM »

L lenses seem to hold values better than body. 5D II/24-70 mrk II combo seems to be a good a choice for non-fast shooting events.

 

1374

EOS Bodies / Re: NEED HELP W/LENSES: What should I get next...?

« on: May 17, 2012, 10:19:43 AM »

Sell your 24-105, that would add another $800 to your pocket.

1. 24-70 II
2. 70-200 2.8 IS II
3. 16-35 II
4. 85 prime

1375

EOS Bodies / Mirrorless Vs Regular DSLR -- Your thoughts???

« on: May 17, 2012, 09:52:19 AM »

Why do you want/prefer mirrorless camera over regular DSLR?

What are the Pros & Cons?

1376

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: A few new shots with my 5D Mark III

« on: May 17, 2012, 09:21:45 AM »

I like 2nd pix.

If you don't mind....what HDR software do you use?

Thanks
Dylan

1377

EOS Bodies / Re: Loss in Resale Value of 5D Mk3

« on: May 17, 2012, 09:18:57 AM »

Canon acknowledged the 'issue' (I'll stop short of calling it a bona fide problem).  They offered to fix it, for free.  What, you now expect them to refund part of your payment as well?  New buyers here probably care a lot more about 'affected' bodies - even then, a significant number of people indicated that they have no intention of send their camera in for the fix.

Do you have a 5DIII?  If so, are you planning to sell it next month?  Most people will keep a body for a few years.  By then, not many buyers will know or care about it (yes, some will, but it's unlikely to have any impact on selling the camera).

Since you mentioned cars, an industry where recalls happen all the time, do you check if the used car you wish to buy was manufactured before a recall date or afterwards? Or do you simply check if the recall was done or not?

Cameras, cars, computers... whatever. Anytime you buy a NEW product as soon as it is released, expect product fixes, recalls and updates. The 5D2 went through changes as well... The fact that Canon is willing to fix it solves the issue. That does not make your fixed 1 series 5D3 worth less than a "current" model.

D

Totally agreed...I'm 15mins away from Canon Service Center, in Irvine CA. Did I bring my camera down for "light leak issue"?.....NO

I plan to keep my camera until CRs shows me 5D mrk 4 is on the way. By then....I would be more than happy to sell my 5D III around $2000 - $2500. Do you think people would still ask if my 5D III has "light leak issue"?   

1378

EOS Bodies / Re: 5DM3 serial number

« on: May 16, 2012, 11:28:22 AM »

Just got my 'new' 5dm3 last night, ordered them from Adorama. But the first thing I checked was the serial number for the body. And sure enough, it's with the 1 S/N (xxxxx1xxxxxx). I would think the new batches will continue with 3 and so on? Did I get the old returned copy, repacked to look new? I hate to return them back and had to wait another month or two. Thanks.

If 5D III has S/N looks like this (xxxxx3xxxxxx), there should be a "RED" tape inside the body that will match with your "L" lenses.

Open it, shoot it and enjoy your new toy 

I have a "1"....no problem under low-light

1379

Lenses / Re: 5D MKIII w 70-200 2.8II using a 1.4x vs 2x extender

« on: May 16, 2012, 11:03:50 AM »

Hi, picked up a 70-200 2.8II with my 5DIII and was wondering what your thoughts were using a 1.4x vs 2x extender?  Thanks!

+1...I'm in the same boat.

I was thinking, instead of getting extender(s). It's better to get decent crop body like 7D.

Pro:
1. stay the same at 2.8
2. Reach: 70-200 = 112 - 320
3. AF stays the same

Cons:
1. not FF sensor
2. noise, in low light

anybody???

1380

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II - Your thoughts

« on: May 15, 2012, 08:59:43 PM »

I think it will be a great addition for wedding photogs, but as a walk around a little too large....and zoom range a little too short on FF.

Really?  I was thinking about getting one as a walk around.  I know it's rather long and with the hood, really long, but you think it would be that cumbersome or uncomfortable (bulk/weight) as a walk around?

Just like that I'm wondering if the 24-70mm is not the right lens for me, although I don't know about the 24-105mm since I would mostly be using it to take pics of my 10 month old baby who does move around rather a lot. 

Wait until the baby is 3yrs...you gonna need 1D X & 24-70 II