September 02, 2014, 06:29:48 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Imagination_landB

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
61
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 28, 2012, 08:17:23 PM »

Don't forget that the European Union has a population of over 300 million people comprises 27 different nations and has 23 official languages! A working knowledge of English and a little French, German and/or Spanish will get you through 95% of all conversations (over 50% of people in the EU speak English as a 1st or 2nd language).
Most of all have fun and a memorable holiday.
Haha yes i'm aware of that i'm bilingual(french and english) and will be able to speak un poquito spanish ;) :P

62
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: A positive feedback for 6D
« on: September 20, 2012, 01:22:52 PM »
I can confirm, that the AF works very well. It´s better in low light than the AF build in the 5D Mark III.
a NEW PROTOTYPE EH? and for your comment i'm pretty impressed bye that, an low light af system that is better in a 2000 camera than in the 3500 one.. Mmmmmm
I would tone down the sarcasm.  The 6D specs indicate that its AF light sensitivity is -3EV.

EDIT: from the Canon USA website:

A new 11-point AF including a high-precision center cross-type AF point with EV -3 sensitivity allows focusing in extreme low-light conditions... http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_6d

From the same website, re: 5D Mark III:

AF Working Range
EV -2 - 18 (at 73°F/23°C and ISO 100)
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_5d_mark_iii?selectedName=Specifications

So, yeah, the 6D has a more senstive AF system in low light.
I was not sarcastic at all. I didn't see these specs. and for the new prototype comment just look at his gear list..

63
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: A positive feedback for 6D
« on: September 20, 2012, 12:30:00 PM »
I can confirm, that the AF works very well. It´s better in low light than the AF build in the 5D Mark III.

But I don´t like the quality of the body and I am not willing to use SD-Cards. The 6D is in my opinion a camera for private use.
a NEW PROTOTYPE EH? and for your comment i'm pretty impressed bye that, an low light af system that is better in a 2000 camera than in the 3500 one.. Mmmmmm

64
EOS Bodies / Re: DxOMark Sensor Performance: Nikon vs. Canon
« on: September 19, 2012, 01:45:38 PM »
Anyway, without being a fanboy at all. I know that nikon cameras recently are very very good , DXO over rates them, how can the d3200 be as good as the 5dmark III...

65
EOS Bodies / Re: Enough Full Frame Talk: Where are the 7D II Rumors?
« on: September 18, 2012, 07:48:39 AM »
I think we all agree that better iso performance is THE thing that a new 7d would need. I have a 60d(same sensor) and it's not great after 800 iso...so good iso performance from 100 to 2500 is not much asked when we compare to the newer models? is it?

66
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D!
« on: September 18, 2012, 07:42:10 AM »
Here we go again. APS-H will reappear when one of two things happens:

  • Nikon and Sony release an APS-H body, or
  • Someone captures a verifiable action shot with their 6D of Bigfoot riding a unicorn.

I think the Bigfoot/Unicorn shot has the better odds.

What about ManBearPig?  It's real, I'm super serial!
Look at my nickname :D i know too its real hehe

67
 :D yess! haha, I just looked at the specs of both sigma 120-300 OS models. The only things that has changed are the body finish, focus swith and lens metal hood, all the others specs are the exact same. The weight is not mentionned but I expect the same since the new lens is a bit larger (about .2 inches more lenght and diameter..) and the optics are the same on the image.

68
ahhhhh i BOUGHT THE 120-300 A MONTH AGO! lets hope that  its just lighter .. i saw that a focus switch and a metal lens hood has been add..anyways mine works perfectly, this lens is reeeeeally good, i was not expecing a replacement anytime soon, but sigma is always improving and pleases us with nice products.

69
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 6D Official Specs
« on: September 17, 2012, 12:27:59 AM »
Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so. :)
Following that logic, one would hope that the 6..D.. would be at least as good as the 7..D.. right?   ;)  Especially for $2000.  Looks like that won't be the case though in many ways.
As I said, entry level** fullf frame, and 7d is one of the very best aps-c camera on the market. two different categories too, FF vs APS-C. 5dmark II is surpassed by some of the specs of the  7d(i know its older)

70
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 6D Official Specs
« on: September 17, 2012, 12:18:37 AM »
So the 6D will have the Digic 5+ processor which is 17x faster than the Digic 4.  Interesting.. Why is the Canon 5DII with 21MP at 3.9 FPS but the 6D with 20MP is only .6 FPS faster?  It appears Canon is holding the 6D back.  Come on Canon, is 5-6 FPS to much to ask for in a $2000 camera?
Exactly what I was thinkg too.

71
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 6D Official Specs
« on: September 17, 2012, 12:12:24 AM »
Ok let's read the name all togheter. 6...D... GREAT!. So logically spec'd under 5d's right? also they call it an ENTRY LEVEL full-frame. so what were you expecting? Yess over priced a bit, 1800 should be the price. It will for sure be better than the 5dmarkII since its a 5years old camera and the new sensors and digic5+ are better..but don't expect it to be as good as the markIII and I doubt very much that the IQ will be better, maybe near as good but never better , and for ISO eprformance wait until it comes out but 1/2 to a full stop worse maybe or as good but I don't think so. :)

72
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 16, 2012, 08:18:15 AM »
haha, if only you knew how its killing me not being able to live there and have all this near me, here everything looks the same except west canadian/american coast(and south american). I love history so much and the europeen continent is  full of it. Right now im young enough to consider going there more than once so split the thing I want to see and do into many travels. i just want to know peoples opinion about whats worth to see the most to help me making some choices, theres already some places that i<m sre to go but if theres something super interesting near, i dont want to miss it! ive made my homeworks on internet and reading books like 1000 places you have to see before you die etc.. but its still worth asking and have real life advices :)
(sorry for the grammar mistakes english aint my native language)

73
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 16, 2012, 04:21:53 AM »
C'mon guys I want more suggestions! :)

74
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 14, 2012, 08:10:27 AM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_Site
haha thank you but I already have a giant size book of unesco world heritage :)

75
Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 13, 2012, 08:59:26 PM »
In France "château de la Loire" like Chambord and Chenonceau, the Alps, Mont Saint Michel, Beauval zoo (in the top ten of the Times magazine), Paris of course and so many other places !
I won't miss the chance to see this for sure (i'm french canadiand(Quebec) so speaking french will please me ;))

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7