April 19, 2014, 05:54:44 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jan

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9
106
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 60D Pictures?
« on: August 12, 2010, 07:03:27 AM »
How can it be that they suddenly make plastic sh... on an eos xx ????? :'(
I can't believe this either.
Don't get me wrong, I believe it, but I don't appreciate it. :(

107
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 60D Notes [CR2]
« on: August 12, 2010, 07:01:26 AM »
Smaller than 50D - cool. Larger grip area sounds like better ergonomics... :)

Plastic body - sh*t. Not that the plastic body of my 400D isn't robust enough, but I like the looks of a Mg-body with parts where the black paint is gone and the shiny Mg is visible ;)... looks kinda indestructible!

108
PowerShot Cameras / Re: S90??
« on: August 11, 2010, 02:34:38 PM »
Could you imagine an S90 w/ an aps-c sensor?  Not quite an evil w/ changeable lenses, just an s90 w/ a larger sensor.  That would be cool.  Just to clarify, I haven't heard anything about that...this is just me dreaming here :)
That would really be cool. But I quess,an APS-C sized sensor would require a larger lens... :(

109
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 60D Pictures?
« on: August 11, 2010, 02:08:33 PM »
Resizing a 18MP image to 10 MP using a decent algorithm is not very much different to using a 10MP sensor with larger pixels in terms of signal processing. After all it's always about integrating photon impact over time and position - it doesn't matter so much if it's done in the hard or the software.
This may be right for DSLRs with big enough pixels. For point'n'shoots I personally think it's wrong. As far as "dynamik range" is concerned, the photogate of the pixel is "full" when a certain amount of photons are collected. The bigger the pixel, the higher the capacity of the photogate, the higher the dynamik range.

Edit: By the way, I really like the pictures of the camera. Looks like a small camera with good ergonomics and good built quality to me.

110
EOS Bodies / Re: A Few 60D Specs [CR2]
« on: August 10, 2010, 03:45:46 PM »
18mp (Exact same as the 7D & T2i)
Exact the same as 7D/550D? Wasn't there a difference between these two sensors? I remember having read this somewhere...

111
EOS Bodies / Re: A Few 60D Specs [CR2]
« on: August 10, 2010, 03:32:17 PM »
If they don't release a new FF camera by the time I actually need a camera, I am thinking of just picking up a 40D as a cheap way to hold me over until a camera I really want comes out.  Like you, I think it handles noise very nicely, and you can get them really cheap now.
You're not really saying that a 40D offers better image quality at lets say 3000x2000 px than a 7D, are you?  :o

Edit: oh, sorry, I didn't read your last post. Never mind.  :)

112
EOS Bodies / Re: 1Ds Mark IV for Photokina [CR1.5]
« on: August 08, 2010, 05:16:37 AM »
A revolutionary PowerShot? What would that be? I would highly appreciate a larger sensor. Maybe good old 2/3"? :)

113
PowerShot Cameras / Re: S90??
« on: August 07, 2010, 09:15:37 AM »
Photokina? ;)

114
EOS Bodies / Re: Which Camera Are You Looking Forward Too?
« on: August 07, 2010, 09:13:14 AM »
60D, because the release date is the closest ;).
Besides I'm also curious about G12, 2000D, 600D...  8)

115
EOS Bodies / Re: 50D & SX1 Replacements Next Week?
« on: August 07, 2010, 09:09:56 AM »
@ release date, why are there alyways these funny dates (like August 11.), who believes that? By now it should be obvious for everyone that they announce the new cameras at photokina.
What is so funny about Augst 11th? :)

116
EOS Bodies / Re: What does canon do for Sony NEX-VG10 ?
« on: August 07, 2010, 06:30:35 AM »
Where ever it is and whatever it is I hope it is FULL FRAME not aps-c
Why this? APS-C equates to the standard 35 mm film-look... A full frame is even bigger.

117
PowerShot Cameras / Re: S90 vs Panny LX5?
« on: July 25, 2010, 03:25:15 PM »
I'd like to see some more revolutionary changes though, particularly in sensor performance, video function, and even the lens department.
I'd like that too. Concerning the sensor, the only way to get better image quality is: bigger sensors and less pixels.

118
EOS Bodies / Re: What does canon do for Sony NEX-VG10 ?
« on: July 25, 2010, 01:46:38 PM »
Funny somehow that it took so long since somebody (now it's Sony) releases a Camcorder with a big sensor. I expected this to happen much earlier. Maybe there is a difference between offering video-capability in a DSLR and offering the same in a camcorder which primary purpose is to record video with a certain level of quality (although I don't exactly see the lack of quality comparing e.g. the 7D with Sony's VX2100).

119
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EVIL/Small DSLR on the Way [CR3]
« on: July 25, 2010, 09:38:55 AM »
They won't press canon for size, much. (well maybe a smaller FF body with HD EVF wouldnt hurt) 8)
I'm sure a smaller FF body (Rebel-sized?!) with a "conventional" mirror-viewfinder wouldn't hurt either. ;)
I definitely would buy one. I don't know if it's possible but there are a lot old SLRs out there, at the size of Rebels or even smaller, so the viewfinder shouldn't be the problem.

120
EOS Bodies / Re: 60D Flip Screen Saga [CR2]
« on: July 25, 2010, 09:34:22 AM »
Touchscreen to. Use it if you like... if you don't like it buttons are still there. Like on Panasonic G2. It adds some cool and useful new features, thats for sure. Costs virtually nothing to implement in hardware.
A touchscreen should be a lot more expensive to build. Besides, I think, it would be thicker (not good for a flip screen). And: I like buttons. I want to feel the button, this gives a more secure and faster handling.
I don't know if AMOLED is the screen of choice. All the AMOLED screens I saw on mobiles and stuff like that weren't as good as LCDs as far as color fidelity and so on are concerned...

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9