May 21, 2013, 02:24:29 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noncho

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Announcement in the Summer? [CR2]
« on: May 20, 2013, 04:44:22 AM »
I need simple things:
AF improvement and 85 1.8(or 100 2) for EOS M. Those with 22 2 will be great compact system, I don't need big dark zooms...

And if Canon are still not ready to deliver it for me - there are other options...

2
You can't say much from video with retouched pictures like this...

3
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Fuji x100(s) to Supplement an SLR
« on: May 12, 2013, 03:56:53 PM »
As skullyspice said - use pancake.

And EOS-M + 22/2 is about 500$ now if you want it really compact.

4
Lenses / Re: Sigma 120-300m F2.8 DG OS HSM (S) First review
« on: May 12, 2013, 06:21:05 AM »
Nice lens, but not working well with TC is not nice...

5
Canon General / Re: Desired fantasy gear
« on: May 08, 2013, 04:32:06 AM »
EF-S 12 2.8
EF-S 400 4 IS

6
After this announcement I'm ready for Sigma 400/4 APS-C smaller and lighter than Canon's  8)   

7
Lenses / Re: Which Super-Zoom is the best?
« on: March 29, 2013, 05:18:28 AM »
Tamron 18-270 VC should be fine.

Don't forget that should be compact for small body like 100D  ;)

8
Lenses / Re: New 100-400 to Launch with EOS 7D Mark II [CR2]
« on: March 28, 2013, 02:23:23 AM »
No, not the 100-400 as a kit, but a new lens otherwise.
Well, they just updated the 18-55 and 18-135 lenses within the last year; maybe they'll do the 18-200 too, who knows. And they already have a good 17-55 and 15-85, not to mention a 24-105 that works well on crop. Not sure what kit lens they could put out that they don't already offer.


15-60 F4

get 2mm on the wide end, and 5 on the long end, and lose a stop of light, plus IS? I'll keep my 17-55, thanks...

If you are looking only the mm here or there go for 18-200
But this would be lighter and cheaper zoom with good range, add great image quality and could be great.
Of course with IS, I thought I don't need to mention it ;)

9
Lenses / Re: New 100-400 to Launch with EOS 7D Mark II [CR2]
« on: March 27, 2013, 10:55:58 AM »
No, not the 100-400 as a kit, but a new lens otherwise.
Well, they just updated the 18-55 and 18-135 lenses within the last year; maybe they'll do the 18-200 too, who knows. And they already have a good 17-55 and 15-85, not to mention a 24-105 that works well on crop. Not sure what kit lens they could put out that they don't already offer.


15-60 F4

11
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon Center Pinch Lens Caps Now Shipping
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:06:02 AM »
10$(+shipping) for piece of plastic that cost no more than 1$? Yeah right...
 

12
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M? [CR1]
« on: February 24, 2013, 01:54:41 PM »
I would consider it if:
They make it with good enough AF(I don't want miracles, just to be on par with other mirrorless)
Good quality small interesting primes - 22/2 is a good start, 12/2.8 and 85/2 would be great...

 I don't need more from that system, small ugly viewfingers are not something that I need.

13
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 19, 2013, 08:27:42 AM »
As 60D user I'll wait for ... 80D with this sensor(if it is good enough)  ;)

14
Nice, but I'm not gonna make fb for that.

15
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Firmware Coming Soon
« on: February 12, 2013, 02:29:24 AM »
You see how much interest is gathering this topic Canon?

YES - your mirrorless is not good rival to micro 4/3 and Nex. 

Pages: [1] 2 3 4