Well, I want to buy a Bentley GT for 30K.
Not at all. If you read the original post price is not the issue here. The issue is Canon is doing thing in vacuum and are more concerned about their product proliferation and different ion rather then competition or coming with a killer package. Their pursuit for maximizing profit through marginal upgrades is getting obvious. Ok, maybe marginal is not the right word here but you get the idea...not saying the mkiii is bad here guys,it just seem Nikon tried harder to come out with a WOW product.
Did Nikon try harder ?
Or did sony tried harder.
Without the D800 the 5D mark iii would be top notch.
It still is, except for the DR which is less then the D800.
But other things from the 5D rocks.
I think everything is blown out of proportion on many forums.
Well I am glad I am off for a 2 week wildlife trip.
And yes with my poor Canon stuff.
I think we should be realistic and stop whining.
Or be a man and buy the D800 and see if this will make your images any better.
The 5D mark III is a superb allround DSLR with a superb AF.
Grow up. The difference is not that big in real word.
And the tools from Canon and Nikon are more then most of us will ever use or need.