April 19, 2014, 12:28:26 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sella174

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 38
136
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 11:25:06 AM »
The point is I wouldn't hire any wedding photographer who was also offering to shoot video unless he had dedicated stills and video shooters with him/her.

Why, when you can theoretically shoot the whole thing in 4K video and then just pull printable stills from the video footage.

Dilbert set up the scenario as 'say we're both wedding photographers'.  Not videographers, not both…photographers. 

When you start to base your counter-arguments on trivial semantics, then you're grasping at straws.

137
Lenses / Re: More EF pancakes?
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:30:13 AM »
If any new pancake were to come out I'd expect it to be EF-S ...

In our dreams ... but this is never, ever going to happen in reality.  :(

138
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:25:34 AM »
These people are just showing their dynamic range.

And since we're Canon users, it's not much ...  :D

139
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:22:27 AM »
is this a photography or harvard business school forum?   ;D

Well, apparently in order to answer the fundamental question posed at the beginning this thread, namely whether the next EOS xD cameras will do 4K video, we've had to rope in the various business theories. And the answer seems that if one follows the "Harvard" way, then Canon will play it conservatively and not include 4K until such time as 4K becomes the de facto standard for amateur videography. Or at least that's how I understand it.

140
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS lens
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:05:37 AM »
Isn't it embarrassing that men call women "shopaholics" and then we do the same $hit and squeal [in a manly way of course  ;)] whenever some new camera gadget comes along. :-[

From this day forward, I'll never again make negative remarks about anybody's desire to shop.  :-\

141
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G1 X II Final Specifications
« on: February 13, 2014, 07:58:32 AM »
Really? or are you kidding?

I'm kidding. But it does sound so very plausible, doesn't it? So it could be true, because many a true word is spoken in jest. And therefore the arrow never hits the tortoise. [insert insane laugh here]

142
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS lens
« on: February 13, 2014, 07:52:53 AM »
Too many choices ... too many choices ...

Olympus just hinted that they will be releasing a 300mm f/4 lens by early next year. So I thought, hey, Olympus, hallo there, here's my dinero and gimme that 25mm. (Although I'd be buying the 35-100mm from Panasonic.)

But this new rascal on an A7 with either the 35mm or the 55mm will suffice just about 99% of my photographic needs ... plus an A6000 for fun. And then to hunt down one of those Sony 600mm catadioptric lenses with AF.

And then there's Fujifilm ... Oh, Fujifilm, I never liked your film emulsions, but your Fujinon lenses were always pretty neat and that X-T1 with 35mm f1/4 is so seductive.

Too many choices ... too many choices ...

143
EOS Bodies / Re: sotchi - canon prototypes
« on: February 13, 2014, 07:42:37 AM »
Possibly. I like to go to local events and see what junk the local "pros" are using to capture those local "iconic moments" forever.  ;D

144
EOS Bodies / Re: Panasonic's view of the 7D successor
« on: February 13, 2014, 07:39:05 AM »
Well, it wasn't really that difficult, because Canon has been releasing the same-o stuff for the past three or four years ... or in the case of the 7D series, not.

145
I'd say you have to go out there and grab the business by the throat. Easiest would be to look for local manufacturers of something, then look at their websites and then go sell yourself by offering to photograph one of their products for free. Then offer to do the rest for a reasonably low fee. I would also not really bother with complicated contracts at this stage and just allow them to do whatever with the images. Primarily you want to build a client list and a reputation right now.

146
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 07:16:13 AM »
How do you like your 4K TV?

I like it real fine, thanks for asking. But just between the two of us, it's really a 16K TV, because that's what I paid for it, oh, eight years ago.

Also, what computer/UHD-monitor/software setup do you have to edit your 4K video?

I got a secondhand Cray XT5 for a song on our local eBay-equivalent site. It does the job sufficiently, as KDE still takes forever to start.

147
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 06:32:34 AM »
... why are you even the least bit concerned about the development of 4k?

Maybe because 4K is what gets me interested in video, perhaps?

148
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 03:00:45 AM »
BTW, not sure if anyone filled you in, but mirrorless = liveview shooting. I think that makes dual pixel a little bit significant at least, wouldn't you say?

Not if I first have to move the mirror out of the way. Not if I have to hold the camera at arm length, with an f/2.8 L zoom attached. (OK, not if the camera has a flippy-out screen ... but the 5DIII does not have one of those, and neither does the 6D nor the 1DX.)  :P

149
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 13, 2014, 02:45:48 AM »
Rule 2: If you can't sell enough of what you do offer, drop it and save the resources.

Interesting. For comparison, we don't think like that in our business model, unless the product causes an actual monetary loss and doesn't make up for it in marketing value.

150
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the next xD cameras do 4k?
« on: February 12, 2014, 05:01:17 PM »
BTW, again, based on your gear list, I don't believe you are anywhere near qualified enough to talk about how good/bad the AF systems of the current higher end Canon bodies are.

Read what I wrote ... 5D2 ... two, not three.

We can resume conversation about this specific topic once you obtain a piece of equipment from this decade.

I do believe the EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM and the EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM are both still, today, current issue from Canon. As for cameras, read what I wrote.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 38