March 05, 2015, 07:01:20 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - untitled10

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
I use a Zoom recorder. I also have audio from two camera's. You don't have to switch audio when you switch video.  They are separate tracks.  You can continue to use audio from one camera and video from another camera or the Zoom.

Where would you place the zoom? I've seen some zooms h4n that were stationary and on a tripod that was faced towards the dj's speakers.

In some zooms (I dont know what ones) you can plug xlrs or jacks directly in, thus recording the audio, don't know about any needs for phantom power or anything though.

Thanks guys, some good advice here.

BP, how long could i run off a typical car battery before it was flat? Also how would I power the LED panels, have you seen any that provide battery packs, or would this be a case of getting a car battery again.

I think builders work lights is a good idea, plus theyre cheap enough to buy. Is the colour temperature of these ok and is the light soft enough or should i make a diffuser for it?

Cheers guys,

I've used builders lights several times, you need a little cooling after but with the right colour correction it can look okay.

here's an example: Balcony Session - Sean McGowan

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Just a quick idea
« on: June 07, 2012, 04:54:14 PM »
But its hardly a large amount of R&D, it would be so simple to implement, I really don't get why they haven't yet O.o

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Just a quick idea
« on: June 07, 2012, 05:14:40 AM »
If canon released this "high MP body" Then in bulb mode it could have a way to type in the amount of time the shutter stays open, instead of using manual triggers?
For example being able to type in 2:30 for your exposure instead of being limited at 30secs, it doesn't have to be exposed for, but just to avoid manual cables and things.
Could this ever be a possibility, or is there something technical thats been overlooked for why it hasn't been done yet?

Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: June 06, 2012, 04:43:51 AM »
ef 20mm f2 L, anyone?

If this really were a lens I would be fist in line, getting a fast wide is essential in gig photography, a little wider than 24 would be unbeatable.

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 II L USM
« on: June 05, 2012, 05:44:10 AM »

Works well in B&W.

Loch Etive in May by Kernuak, on Flickr

Loch Etive in Stormy Weather by Kernuak, on Flickr

Moorland Habitat by Kernuak, on Flickr

Aigas Moorland by Kernuak, on Flickr

Oh that water mark really hurts your composition, maybe if you put it in the bottom left? nice shots though

Lenses / Re: Sigma 300mm 2.8 PRIME
« on: June 04, 2012, 07:34:59 AM »
Any info at all would be amazing, herd good things about this lens, did anyone else even know it exsisted?

Lenses / Sigma 300mm 2.8 PRIME
« on: June 02, 2012, 05:05:37 PM »
Does anyone have any idea about this lens, for the dame price as a 300L f4 i'm interested ^_^
No is I know, but the aperture/focal length is really appealing for my gig photography

anyone know about quality?

Canon EF-S and EF-M Lenses / Re: Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
« on: May 24, 2012, 04:18:35 PM »
Here's my 10-22 submission. I took a ride to the Hamptons and this was taken at the end of Gin Lane in Southampton.

is this the UK Southampton? (I have no idea if there are places in America with the same name )

Lenses / varying aperture zoom lenses
« on: May 18, 2012, 05:59:36 PM »
I'm just going to go straight out, I hate lenses that vary their apertures through out the zoom range, I can't stand it.
A while ago there was a suggestion the the 17-40 f/4 would be upgraded to a 17-40 f/2.8-4, if this happened I would stick to the f/4 edition because I wouldn't be able to get around having to change exposure (I shoot mostly manual and inside) every time I zoom, is this just me, or do other people get irritated by this down fall?

(not looking for a flame war, just expressing views)

Lenses / Re: 50mm 1.2
« on: May 16, 2012, 04:13:21 PM »
if you're putting budget aside why wouldn't you get the 1.2?
its faster, sharper and has better build quality.

Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
« on: May 09, 2012, 01:01:27 PM »

This is really nice, but a little soft, i'm presuming that was in post?

Lenses / Re: 5D MKIII w 70-200 2.8II using a 1.4x vs 2x extender
« on: May 07, 2012, 06:30:54 PM »
Really depends on what you use it for, weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of both for what you do.

Canon non-EF Lenses (TS-E, FD, etc.) / Re: Canon TS-E24 f/3.5 II
« on: May 06, 2012, 05:35:27 PM »

I wish I could have photoshopped that building being built out of the photo....  but l can't unless someone knows how to in light room.

Send me a clean jpg and ill do it for you ^_^

Canon non-EF Lenses (TS-E, FD, etc.) / Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« on: May 06, 2012, 05:07:07 PM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)

its MF only too ;)

the technique I use was set the lens to minimum focus distance, held the lens and camera lookign through the viewfinder, advance slowly then when the image came into focus drop onto one knee kind of in a kneeling rifle shooting position and snapped of a short burst, (only 3 shots, 2 of which were sharp.

definately  not a lens that you can handhold often or for too long since the lens is 4.5kg and the 1D is 1.3kg its quite a beefy combo, much more comfy on a gimbal

Awesome shot. How much does that lens go for? (Too tired to look it up.)
Could only find one copy on ebay

£1100 mark?

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6