Messages

1

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III with Continuous RAW Video Recording

« on: May 13, 2013, 08:57:27 AM »

The 1Dc is basicaly a 1Dx with other Software and a bigger heat sink.
I'm not sure if it is the same problem here but I'd be carefull not to damage my 5D due to more heat from the raw output.

2

Lenses / Re: Renting a wildlife lens

« on: March 26, 2013, 10:38:24 AM »

Since you have a 70-200 2.8 IS II mentioned in your signature you should consider getting/renting a 2x extender. It will keep your kit lighter and cheaper. The IQ is said to be almost as good as with the 100-400mm.
Have a fun and safe trip.

3

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 100D Coming? [CR1]

« on: March 16, 2013, 08:57:14 AM »

It was also mentioned that the price of the EOS 100D was “a bit expensive”.

How does this even make sense?! 

4

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Roadmap for 2013 [CR2]

« on: January 27, 2013, 06:00:54 AM »

everything points to a new 100-400L

I believe in a 100-400 L II when I see it. This lens is the successor of the never going to be updated 24-70 2.8 IS / II here on CannonRumors

5

PowerShot / Re: Canon Announces The PowerShot N

« on: January 07, 2013, 09:32:48 AM »

hilarious

I need one to take self-portraits. Wait! Where am I supposed to hold this 'thing' ?!

This is one of the ugliest cameras I've ever seen.

6

Contests / Re: Gura Gear Giveaway!

« on: December 07, 2012, 10:11:26 AM »

I need an excuse to buy more gear.
Gimme that bag!

7

Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 100 f/2.8L IS Macro

« on: November 27, 2012, 10:13:08 AM »

Great review - I totally agree. A remarkable piece of engeneering.

I used this lens a lot... until i got my 85 1.2 II which is now mounted most of the time because the 100L is just a little too long for portraits on APS-C.

But still, my most favorite shots where taken with it.

8

Lenses / 70-200 2.8 II vs. 85mm 1.2 II - general opinion

« on: July 26, 2012, 04:24:24 PM »

Hello all,

I want to buy one of these two lenses within the next weeks. Having read all the articels about IQ, autofocus, weight, I don't need any advice like "my lens is sharper" or "the 85mm has a lot more/pleasing bokeh".
These are questions to those who own both lenses: Which one is you favourite for portraits and why? Do you prefer the 85 or the 70-200 when it comes to low light shooting (e.g. portraits in the woods at late afternoon)? What else do you use the two for and which one do you use more often? What makes one of the two lenses more remarkable than the other?

I currently own a 7D with the 15-85, 100L and 70-200 4.0 non IS. I usually use the 100L because of the background blur but find it slightly to long for my purpose. My 70-200 has the obvious zoom range advantage.

9

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40 f/2.8 Pancake

« on: June 06, 2012, 03:51:56 PM »

maybe it is for the 1.3 crop sensor mirrorless - anounced "sooner than later"

*just dreaming*

looks fun to me. lets hope it is not too pricy. might get one if it's priced similar to the 50 1.8

10

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EF 600 f/4L IS II in Stock?

« on: June 01, 2012, 02:19:37 PM »

Lensrentals said they had the 500 II available for rent on tuesday - finally

http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/supertelephoto/canon-500mm-f4l-is-ii

11

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 70D & EOS 7D Mark II Speculation [CR1]

« on: May 21, 2012, 02:14:45 PM »

Anything about when they could be in the stores?
I need a new cam for my next trip in august and I need to get to know it......

Don't even think about it.  This is a CR1 rumor! Even if it was CR3 with an announcement next week, it could take 2-3 month to start shipping.

I'm glad I bought my 7D last November. It is a great camera and will stay great Camera even after any 7(0)D announcement.

12

Lenses / Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/15 super wide angle lens

« on: March 16, 2012, 06:47:46 AM »

The rumored zeiss super wide angle lens is finally there:

http://blogs.zeiss.com/photo/en/?p=1567#more-1567

13

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 7D - Wait or buy?

« on: February 28, 2012, 04:15:51 PM »

I'm sort of in the same position.  I decided to wait a bit.  Even if I don't get one of the new ones that come out, hopefully the existing ones will at least drop in price.

It sounds like there may not be a 7D replacement any time soon, if ever, but I'd rather wait a bit and see.

Never base buying decisions on rumors, is the usual reply to this kind of post I know it's difficult.

14

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 7D - Wait or buy?

« on: February 28, 2012, 04:05:48 PM »

I was in the same position in November and finally pulled the trigger - comming from a Rebel XS/1000D. It is an excellent camera and will be an excellent camera even when a 7D II is announced. I expect the upgrade to be minor. View-finder and fps will probably stay the same as well as build quality and AF. Canon definitely have to upgrade the sensor and processor.
Image quality will be an upgrade from your current camera. For me the better IQ of the current 7D was enough. Might get a FF for the ultimate IQ within the next... uhm 5 years (looking forward to 5D IV rumors <-- just kidding)
Just my opinion here

15

Lenses / Re: 70 - 200 f/4L vs. 70 - 300 f4-5.6 IS USM

« on: February 28, 2012, 05:05:09 AM »

I chose the 70-200L over the 70-300 IS 3 years ago. I don't really know why. Maybe I couldn't resist the L-feeling.
Never tried them side by side so I can only tell you my experience with the L-lens. It feels solid, has good and silent AF, smooth zoom and focus rings (as you would expect from an L) and last but not least the IQ is very good. I sometimes feel a need for the missing IS but since I manly shoot outdoor sports/landscapes I couldn't justify a new 70-200 with IS (4.0 or 2.8 II).

Following is a quote from the-digital-picture.com and the links to the reviews:

Those contemplating a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Lens purchase are typically considering the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens as well. Priced similarly with an extended focal length range and an excellent implementation of IS, this lens fills many of the same requirements as the 70-200 f/4. I usually recommend the 70-200 f/4 over the 70-300 IS because of its physical and optical advantages, but read the 70-300 review to find out which is better for your needs.

70-200:
http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-4.0-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

70-300:
http://the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-300mm-f-4-5.6-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

Attached is photo from Sunday night with the 70-200:
70mm f/4.0 ISO 3200(7D)