February 01, 2015, 02:23:33 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - tomscott

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 44
EOS Bodies / Re: Frustrated with Canon
« on: March 17, 2013, 03:18:13 PM »
Sounds like handbags at 10 paces, keep it down girls.

Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: March 17, 2013, 03:05:33 PM »

Lenses / Re: Is my 24-105mm f/4 L unreasonably soft?
« on: March 17, 2013, 02:59:37 PM »
I had the 17-85mm and it was awful.

The 24-105 is very sharp in comparison. Maybe just needs some good AFMA

Amazing. Really enjoyed your video

Landscape / Re: 24 tilt & shift dramatic b&w landscapes!
« on: March 15, 2013, 06:45:02 AM »

Lenses / Re: 17-40mm advice please!
« on: March 14, 2013, 03:25:57 PM »
No what he means is the depth of field, not that you loose a stop and a half of light.

I recently bought a Sony Nex 5N for £400 with the twin lens system was a bargain and a great lightweight all round camera for the days when I dont want to carry my 5DMKIII.

I also use a Bronica ETRSI on the odd occasion.

Landscape / Re: Decaying Nature close up...
« on: March 14, 2013, 01:03:20 PM »
Hi Ivan,

I have to agree with some of the comments above. I had a look at your blog and I dont think you choose the best images from that set. The way you have described your process fits these images although I like the awkward slightly unappealing nature of them.

I also had a look at your other images.

12 minutes in Booysens. I think these are great, the awkwardness of the images and the documentary style is great. Reminds me much of Walker Evans. The documents are not aesthetic, they are very revealing and awkward.

The general public and the Farm Security Administration hated Edward westerns photographic style. What I would say is keep shooting. If you were doing a fine art photography course you could easily exhibit those Booysens pics. They would be appreciated more, unlike the aesthetic snappers style on a forum like this. No offence meant to the forum users :)

Landscape / Re: Landscape From 36,000 Feet!
« on: March 14, 2013, 08:16:16 AM »
Get pic! Slightly different perspective

North Atlantic Ocean by TomScottPhotographyCumbria, on Flickr

North Atlantic Heading from Manchester to New York

Sports / Re: Cars cars cars (and some bikes)
« on: March 13, 2013, 08:42:46 AM »
Stumbled upon this one while out wandering around Newcastle Uk. Luckily had my walk around camera Sony Nexus 5N which I love!

Ferrari 458 Italia, Newcastle by TomScottPhotographyCumbria, on Flickr

Ferrari 458 Italia, Newcastle by TomScottPhotographyCumbria, on Flickr

Ferrari 458 Italia, Newcastle by TomScottPhotographyCumbria, on Flickr

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR1]
« on: March 08, 2013, 07:58:37 AM »
I find it really hard to feel Canon have the tech to produce a high performing APC sensor right now. Unless that is the reason they have left a larger time scale between the products.

I really hope that I am wrong. Going from the 7D to 5DMKIII was a massive leap for me. But I cant go back to use a 7D as a second body, that 18mp sensor just doesn't cut it.

Neither can I see the APC sensor matching the current FF in noise quality. It will come just not yet, I would say maybe 3-4 years time.

The whole APC line up seems old and lost to me, the whole range using the same sensor, with just small details of change. I will feel similar with the higher end stuff if they make the 7DMKII with this spec, all using the same AF and a similar MP count.

They need to sort out the whole line of cameras and put it back into order. If the 7DMKII is a pro camera and they replace the 7D with the 70D and do away with the 60D type enthusiast body camera and have the XXXD as it is but with a better sensor, upgrade path is the XXD to the 6D, then the higher end being the 5DMKIII 1DX and 7DMKII.

But then we have two fast cameras both weather sealed same AF similar FPS but one that gives more reach but lesser quality and one with more quality but lesser reach. Then the 5DMKIII for the event/document photographer.

Yet we still haven't got the high MP 1D performer. Not sure what their line up will be, atm it doesnt seem logical.

The 7D was never a cheap camera, it isnt for the average photographer it is for the more demanding prosumer/pro. It will never be aimed at the low end. People that complain on here are aspiring photographers who maybe cant justify the higher price tag, you are not the sector Canon are after. It was the same with the 5DMKIII, yet it is a hugely popular camera.

Just my 2p

Lenses / Re: So I decided to buy a Sigma zoom.
« on: March 07, 2013, 07:13:44 AM »
Nice review.

But I don't see many positives. Whats the point of buying a lens if in the areas you want it to perform - AF, Sharpness and IS aren't particularly great and are detriment to the image.

I understand the saving money bit but I would rather spend more and get a better performing lens. Its cheaper for a reason. if your making money which it sounds like you are then why not get something better and more reliable...

But then again the 50Ds AF isnt amazing either. It may perform better on a 5DMKIII but also the FF sensor will make the lenses problems more pronounced as your crop camera is using the best part of the glass. So I would say it will be even more disappointing on FF.

Ive never liked the Sigma lenses. Ive had two, both of the front elements fell out. Canon lenses are just better and more reliable IMO.

This lens doesn't carry sigmas EX label either, sigma hasn't rated this lens to its highest class. Aimed more toward the advanced amateur not the protog. So really its not surprising it doesn't match the quality of the L glass. Suppose if your on a budget then its ok. Is the 5.6 really 5.6 tho? A lot of sigma lenses are more like 6.3 at the long end and fool the camera to 5.6 for focus.

Lenses / Re: Canon 100-400 f/4-5.6L IS II Design Idea
« on: March 04, 2013, 10:30:52 AM »
Jeese, its just some fun lighten up.

Especially didn't expect it from the more prolific posters and contributors like Neuro. Just poor if you ask me, you should know better.

Thats why I don't contribute much to this forum because its such a harsh environment. The BMW forum I belong to is so much more chilled and friendly and you can express anything without being bashed. But then its age range is probably higher and more mature.

BTW dont let these people get to you, playing is the best way of learning.

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 12,800ISO 5DMKIII Images
« on: March 01, 2013, 01:46:17 PM »
Great shot

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 12,800ISO 5DMKIII Images
« on: March 01, 2013, 11:23:08 AM »
i wonder how much better the 6D can do in 12800.

Probably similar. Thing with the 6D is they have added a higher noise reduction setting which makes the images look less noisy out of the camera, but the 5D MKIII will retain more details.

TBH its so close its not worth worrying about if your a pixel peeper then maybe  :P

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 44