September 03, 2014, 03:39:55 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 225
1936
Canon General / Re: Is canon going to come back?
« on: November 30, 2012, 04:35:23 PM »
The 5D3 is a better overall package because of these things.

1. AF superiority
2. Better video functions and controls
3. Better ergonomics. The d800 is a step back from the d700.
4. Silent shutter is whisper quiet.
5. In-camera RAW processing which is great for photo booths.
6. Small, medium and full RAW settings
7. 6 frames per second shooting
8. Simplified menu system
9. Double exposure. (Not sure if the d800 has this)
10. Shares all the battery's from the semi-pro lineup.

These are practical things that make the 5D3 a better overall camera body.

1937
Third Party Manufacturers / Pentax FF DSLR for under 1499$ at release.
« on: November 29, 2012, 04:48:51 PM »
If Pentax Released a FF DSLR for for under 1499$, Would it take them back to the top like they used to be? Pentax has some great glass but lack-luster bodies. They are cheaper than other options though.

What would it take to consider a pentax system again?

1938
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Ended: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body $2499
« on: November 29, 2012, 04:06:30 PM »
My camera just shipped.  ;D

1939
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D vs 5D MKII (Focusing?)
« on: November 29, 2012, 04:04:34 PM »
I expect both are wretched and If its any better than that, good work canon.

1940
EOS Bodies / Re: Asking for 5D III firmware improvements
« on: November 29, 2012, 04:02:42 PM »
1. AF focus speed with Speedlites

2. Blink AF point fix

3. f/8 Focusing

Its funny because the 5D3 61-point AF is fantastic while also being wretched at the same time.

1941
Lenses / Re: Filters for 24-70 II
« on: November 29, 2012, 03:54:28 PM »
B&W MRC Xs-pro Nano-coated UV filters. The very best to protect your very best.

It Also completes the weather-sealing. ;D

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/756192-REG/B_W_1066126_82mm_Ultraviolet_UV_MC.html

1943
Site Information / Re: I want to thank you all...
« on: November 29, 2012, 02:57:02 PM »
Hi,

I would like to thank all of you all. It has been very enlightening and enjoyable communicating on this forum. I have received more than I have given. Hopefully that equation will change - me giving more...

Thanks again.

Rustom

+1

1944
Lenses / Re: Visualising focal length perception.
« on: November 29, 2012, 02:53:42 PM »
The wires over the model head are a no go in photography. Bad composition.
Wires? You are looking at the wires?

Dude! Surely you can do better!

Well, It would be better w/o the wires. Block them out with your thumb and it looks better to me. Nothing some PS can't fix. ::)

1945
Reviews / Re: Review - Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD with Pictures
« on: November 29, 2012, 01:42:05 PM »
Nice Review. My only gripe is I Wish the samples were bigger to see.  :-\

1946
Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:57:37 AM »
If they could make the same 135mm f2 with IS, I would be more than satisfied, I'm afraid the extra 1/3 of stop of a 1.8 version would only add weight, bulk, a larger filter size and 3 times the price. The new 135mm f2 IS when it comes will likely sell for 1899$ anyway.

Zeiss already make's a 135 F/1.8. It should be no big deal for canon.  :P

I guess it's no big deal, after all Nikon even had a 300mm f2 in the past; I just wonder if the extra 1/3 stop would justify all the negatives (weight, bulk, filter size, price).

If canon made a 300mm F/2L IS USM, that would also be in this list of wanted rumored lenses.  ;D

That Zeiss 135mm F1.8 is just stunning.

1947
Canon General / Re: Is canon going to come back?
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:54:34 AM »
"There is not a single lens that Nikon makes that tempts me to switch--Canon has a rival to match or beat everything they offer.  Am I wrong?"

Well.... 14-24....

Zeiss 15mm 2.8  :o

If zeiss made AF lenses for canon, I'd never buy canon lenses.  ;D

1948
Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:27:04 AM »
If they could make the same 135mm f2 with IS, I would be more than satisfied, I'm afraid the extra 1/3 of stop of a 1.8 version would only add weight, bulk, a larger filter size and 3 times the price. The new 135mm f2 IS when it comes will likely sell for 1899$ anyway.

Zeiss already make's a 135 F/1.8. It should be no big deal for canon.  :P

1949
I made a statement, You said I'm wrong. The burden of proof is on you.

I've provided many, many samples of the 5Dc's superb IQ. You have provided none.

You haven't provided a single sample for comparison. Nor could you provide one on request here, even though you claim to have handled both.

Your statement claims the opposite of published, professional test data and sample images (DPReview; Imaging Resource). Therefore the burden of proof is entirely on you.

But go ahead and rant in 36 point again like a spoiled child throwing a temper tantrum.

Your plainly mistaken Mr. Taylor. I was a Avid 5Dc + 7D combo user.

1. http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=9773.45

2. http://ramonlperez.tumblr.com/post/34906285033/fast-prime-shoot-out-pt-2-50mm-1-2l-review

3. http://images.us.viewbook.com/9a8bb8062cdfc9b86e057b85a601e742.jpg

Since I don't shoot test charts and my experience is real world, If you don't get what not only myself have been saying but other 5Dc users have also agreed on. There is no helping you.

Please, I would love to see some of your ISO 3200 Shots from the 7D, Because I already know what they're going to look like.

1950
EOS Bodies / Re: What will be the issue with the 6D
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:15:52 AM »
No Multi-Selector  >:(

Pages: 1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 225