July 29, 2014, 06:10:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DJL329

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32
436
Contests / Re: Blue Crane Digital Giveaway!
« on: May 27, 2011, 07:47:47 PM »
"The End of Winter"

My entry for the "Understanding the Canon Speedlite" DVD.

437
Lenses / Re: Using EF-S lens on FF body???
« on: May 26, 2011, 07:12:27 PM »
Even if you could, you're still not going to fill up the a full-frame sensor, so why bother risking it?

438
Lenses / Re: Does anyone know of any adaptors which allow
« on: May 26, 2011, 12:23:17 AM »
If possible I wish try and fit the Canon 10-22mm lens to my new Canon 5Dd markll,
i don"t have any wide lens for my new 5d mark ll, except 85mm1.8,  28-135,
2 days ago i preapered money for buy canon lens 17-40, on the last minute when i searched on the photography forums, i saw some people said this not great lens and have some issue on the edge, and something els,
now i just need one wide canon lens, thanks for any advice

Even if you could mount it, the EF-S 10-22mm will not fill up the sensor on a full-frame dSLR (or 35mm SLR, for that matter), as it is designed for the smaller 1.6x crop sensor.  Lots (most?) of lenses are 'soft in the corners,' but unless you're making large prints, I doubt it will be a big problem.  Don't be a 'pixel peeper' -- worry about your subject and how it's framed.  Besides, if they could make lenses 'perfect,' they wouldn't have to keep designing new ones... ;)

The 17-40mm f/4L is one of Canon's "L" lenses, so it'll be of higher quality than the 10-22mm.  That wide, the only other options for full-frame are the 16-35mm f/2.8L (more expensive, of course) or the 14mm f/2.8L, which is even more expensive.

You could also check out 3rd party lenses, like the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 (also sold under other names, such as Bower at B&H Photo).  I've seen lots of good reviews of that particular one, however it is completely manual, so no auto-focus.

My recommendation is to check out the Canon forums on fredmiranda dot com for reviews and samples images taken with the 17-40mm.  (They also have a buy&sell forum, for purchasing used equipment.)  And, as someone else mentioned, try it out before you buy (always a good idea with an expensive item). 

439
Canon General / Re: Patent - EF 50 f/1.4
« on: May 25, 2011, 09:11:19 PM »
Any experts who are able to explain what the potential differences may be? To me this looks like the same design Canon had for the last 40 years - which I think is great by the way.

What is the thing marked as "Ggi 1"? And could it be that the lens element in the back is bigger?

So, anyway - what ever they'll do I hope it'll be better mechanically.

usm?

Definitely has to have USM.  A reduced MFD would also be nice, as some of the newer primes have.

440
Canon General / Re: Patent - EF 50 f/1.4
« on: May 25, 2011, 07:59:23 PM »
I wonder, though, if the EF non-L primes sell enough these days for Canon to feel that a redesign and everything associated with a new product is warranted.  In recent years there seems to have been a pattern of letting non-L primes wither.

Perhaps now that they updated a lot (most?) of the L primes, they're finally getting around to the non-L primes.  The 15mm Fisheye would be one example.

441
Lenses / Re: New Canon Lenses Availability - Update
« on: May 25, 2011, 07:56:16 PM »
Quote
My feeling is that no new lens announcements will be made until they've sorted this mess out.

Generally, I'm not one to second-guess Canon (or Nikon). I can't argue with their success. But, I do admit this whole lens thing has me wondering.

I didn't pay much attention when these lenses were first announced because lenses that cost thousands of dollars aren't likely to show up in my camera bag anytime soon. I never really understood why they felt the need to upgrade these Big Whites and assumed it had more to do with market positioning than anything else.

But, as the months go by without the product actually being delivered, it sure does seem that it's got to be a little embarrassing. And, I agree that it's a little hard to announce and deliver other lenses while these announcements gather dust.

1.  As megapixels increase, the dSLRs start to out-resolve the lenses.

2.  New technology, including the newer IS modes.

3.  Competition.  If you sit still, you fall behind.

4.  Part of the delay has been caused by the natural disasters in Japan, which is where the bodies and lenses are produced.

442
Lenses / Re: New Canon Lenses Availability - Update
« on: May 25, 2011, 06:50:39 PM »
I can't wait for the comments from the folks wondering 'Why wasn't the 200-400mm w/1.4x TC included in this updated announcement?'

(In case you are wondering, that lens is a P-R-O-T-O-T-Y-P-E, not a product ready for release.)

443
EOS Bodies / Re: A grateful end to the DSLR video "revolution"
« on: May 22, 2011, 09:34:37 AM »
You two realize that Gibbygoo actually didn't write this?  :-\

Apparently not!

444
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III [CR1]
« on: May 21, 2011, 10:58:52 AM »
If the pixel count followed Morse's law (like storage does), the 5D3 would have been 80MP.

I believe you meant Moore's Law, which refers to the number of transistors on an integrated circuit (which double every two years), not storage.

445
EOS Bodies / Re: best quallity ,full framecanon dslr choice ?
« on: May 14, 2011, 11:52:08 AM »
"Computers aren't the same as cameras.  Comparing them is like apples and oranges."

1.  I have to disagree with that statement.  Essentially a digital camera IS a computer.

2.  So why wouldn't it be logical to expect a camera's abilities to increase substantially every couple years?  Note, I didn't say double every two years, but a substantial increase.

3.  But knowing a DSLR is essentially a computer why do we have such outrageous prices for used models?

1.  A digital camera *has* a computer inside, but it is not a multi-function device, like a 'desktop computer.'  It's more comparable to a 'gaming' system (PS, XBox, etc.):  a single-function device, which use proprietary hardware and, like cameras, get updated much less frequently.

2.  Because computers are general function devices that use standardized hardware and there is a lot of competition.  Another reason is that the system vendors (HP, Dell, IBM, etc.) don't have to design and build their own processors:  Intel and AMD take care of that, and their head-to-head competition drives design and keeps prices down.  Canon and Nikon know that you're not going to take your lenses and mount them on some start-up company's camera, so they don't have to release new cameras as often.  Since they're both making lots of money, they have no reason to change.  [If all lenses fit on all cameras without an adapter, and all of a sudden a new company came along and started rolling out new cameras on a faster schedule with new features, Canon and Nikon would be forced to change.]

3.  Supply and demand.  People can sell products (new or used) for whatever the market will bear.  If no one was willing to spend that much money for a used camera or lens, the prices would be lower.  It also shows the lack of homework that people do, especially when you see someone buy used equipment on places like ebay for close to or even more than a new item.

446
Landscape / Re: Buying a Camera
« on: May 14, 2011, 01:24:40 AM »
I'm trying to decide if I should buy Canon T2i, T3i or 60D. I think that the 60D is better than the others but; it comes with only one lens 18 - 135, is that a good enough lens for landscapes(sunsets)? or do you think that the other 2 are as good as the 60D? :-\


As someone else also said, the 28mm f/1.8 is excellent for landscapes/sunsets (I use it for them all the time).  Here's an example:

http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/photo-contests/2nd-annual-the-great-outdoors/gallery/562701-end-of-winter.html

Also, read up on how to take good pictures (composition, framing, exposure, etc.), because good photography happens with a camera, not a computer.  Your time is better spent taking pictures, than fiddling with .raw files.  You can get brilliant colors with .jpg files by changing the "Picture Style" settings from their defaults and setting the white balance correctly before you start shooting.

Good luck and have fun!

447
Software & Accessories / Re: Radio in New Canon Flashes? [CR2]
« on: May 11, 2011, 08:46:40 PM »
Really! Canon needs to deliver on what they promised us in the last nine months. Super tele refresh. And the fisheye zoom. And don't forget the 200-400 f/4 1.4x!!

Bodies can't come soon enough for many of us, but we'll just have to wait.

Other new lenses can't come soon enough, but I have a hunch I'll be on this site repeating myself for the next few years on the last two especially (24-70 2.8 IS, 14-24 2.8, 85 1.4 IS).

Canon stated the 200-400mm f/4 w/1.4x was a prototype, meaning it is not something about to be released.  As for the announced lenses, they are delayed (like all Canon and Nikon products made in Japan), because of the consequences of the quake and tsunami.

448
EOS Bodies / Re: A Random Roadmap: Lenses & Bodies [CR1]
« on: April 27, 2011, 05:19:17 PM »
I have $ allocated if they release a 24-70 II IS!


It's looking like the 24-70mm II won't have IS.  I didn't think it would even before seeing this (it's too short a focal length):

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,897.msg12095/topicseen.html#new

449
EOS Bodies / Re: A Random Roadmap: Lenses & Bodies [CR1]
« on: April 27, 2011, 05:16:32 PM »
I wish Canon would update the 50 f 1.4.

+1  Couldn't agree more.  That "micro" USM has to go.

450
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L II Patent Published
« on: April 25, 2011, 11:16:48 PM »
Oh man...I bought the Mk. I version of this lens on THURSDAY.  *sigh*

This isn't a product announcement.  Also, just because a patent was published, it doesn't mean that the new version is imminent.  Some patents never become real products.  The ones that do can take years to reach the market.

True, but the timing, with rumors of a new body, the DIGIC V news, the expected 5D3 or 1Dx ... this is looking like a kit lens that'll be out this year.

I doubt very seriously the 24-70 will make it to America as a kit lens. Too pricey.

On top of that, the lenses they announced last year still haven't made it to the market.  They were way behind schedule even before the earthquake/tsunami hit.  Who knows what that has done to Canon's time lines.

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32