October 22, 2014, 12:03:20 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Velo Steve

Pages: 1 [2]
16
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Lens Mug - Giveaway
« on: August 30, 2011, 07:40:24 PM »
Imagine that you are shooting a landscape and a rare bird lands on a nearby limb.

The camera should be able to accurately shoot out a glob of adhesive, fastening the bird to the branch.  Then you have plenty of time to switch to a telephoto lens and adjust settings without missing the shot.

Of course the glue should biodegrade in a minute or two, releasing the bird.

17
PowerShot Cameras / Re: Tuesdays PowerShots
« on: August 21, 2011, 12:22:34 AM »
Does anyone know if there's some rhyme or reason to the compact camera names, such as SXxxx (with and without an HS suffix) or Axxxx or Sxx?  Different target markets?  Different key features?  Or is it just a bunch of random letters?

Not that I care about the tiny-sensor cameras, but I'm still curious.

Steve

18
PowerShot Cameras / Re: August 23 is Announcement Day [CR3]
« on: August 20, 2011, 12:50:57 PM »
I just hope one of the compacts has a sensor at least as large as the S95's.  I'm waiting for the 5D Mark III like a lot of you, but on my next trip I have to travel light.

19
For what it's worth, here's my experience.  I have an Intel 64-bit processor, and Windows 7 64 bit.  My files are .CR2 files from a 40D, and they display fine in Photoshop.

Installed the _x86 file.  The preview pane doesn't show a raw image.  No error messages.
Uninstalled.
Installed the _amd64 file.  The preview pane doesn't show raw image.  No error messages.

The Microsoft site mentions Windows Live, but I don't use that (at least not in any way I'm aware of).  Either this software doesn't work or it has some obscure use that doesn't apply to anything I do.  I'm uninstalling it.

20
charlie,Velo Steve ,goretexguy,noisejammer , DavidD  and who shared of the Yousemite national park "s images at this place, realy appreciated and if you have more photo ,please just upload it here and we will enjoy,..
You may note that three of us,
DavidD http://www.inspiringlandscapes.com/moonbowyfalls.htm
noisejammer http://www.flickr.com/people/noisejammer/
Velo Steve http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=29145750@N00&q=yosemite
have provided links to more photos.

In my case I prefer that you use the link rather than asking for photos to be reposted here.  There are two main reasons:
1) Why waste the server space and effort by double-posting when following a link is easy?
2) Flickr automatically associates each photo with my preferred licensing terms.

Steve

21
From last Friday, at the top of Nevada Fall, looking straight down.

For 511 more shots  :D  http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=29145750@N00&q=yosemite

22
United States / Re: Help getting started
« on: July 14, 2011, 12:42:12 PM »
...
I have been told by many people that my photos are good, and I would like some advice on how to start selling my photos. I have a smugmug already, www.alexmojica.com , but after almost a year of posting pictures, my only sales have been to family  :( . Could anyone give me some advice on advertising?

(Also, if you want to give me some pointers for the photos themselves, I would really appreciate it!  ;D )

It seems that most of the comments have been about the content of your photos.   They are good comments, for the most part, but don't completely address your question.  I won't claim a complete answer, but I have a couple of different thoughts.

First, take the comments of friends with a grain of salt.  Lots of people tell me what a good photographer I am, and I have even been invited to be the next artist in a rotating display at the local library.  Does that make me competitive with the best?  No way!  Everyone is a photographer these days, and I'm sure many thousands are better than I am.  Many of those are probably as good as you or better.

Of course there's a good side to this.  Potential customers are not necessarily more discerning than your friends and family.  You don't have to create the best photo of "X" in the world.  You have to offer a very good photo of "X" in a place where paying customers will find it.  Once you reach a certain level it's more about marketing than the actual photography.

Apologies if this has been covered, but two very different market niches come to mind.  One is art photography - the sort of thing people buy to hang on their walls because it is beautiful.  The other is the sort of photography used in advertising, books, commercial web sites and so on.  I'm not really an expert on either, but it is obvious that what you shoot and how you market to each niche will be very different.

One last thought.  Making a little money from your hobby is one thing, and making a career of it is another.  In my opinion, it is only getting harder to be a professional photographer.  Some photography jobs will always exist, but the proliferation of high quality cameras and people who enjoy using them means that there will be increasing competition, and many of the new photographers are giving their work away under Creative Commons licenses.  Organizations which might have paid a few hundred dollars for a minor photo for their publications are now finding them online for nothing.  If you want to be a pro, be prepared to work hard, to work smart, and to adapt your preferences to what actually sells.

23
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Info
« on: June 06, 2011, 05:39:13 PM »
Like gene_can_sing I'm normally here to look for DSLR news.  This time is different - I'm in the market for a smaller camera for a bicycle trip in September.  I wonder if there is any hope for a G12 or S95 successor to actually be available by then?

Steve

24
EOS Bodies / Re: What do you want from the 5D mk III
« on: May 09, 2011, 11:33:15 AM »
  • USB3 support.
  • Ability to program series of (time lapse) exposure for stills, and time lapse for video
I edited the quote down to two items which should have been in my list too.

Time lapse should be really simple to add, would save having to connect a laptop with EOS utility to do a simple series of photos.

25
EOS Bodies / Re: What do you want from the 5D mk III
« on: May 08, 2011, 08:07:19 PM »
    Here's my wish list, most important first:

    • At least two stops higher ISO without an increase in noise.  The improvement needs to be at the sensor level - not just postprocessing.
    • Improved focus tracking of moving objects (athletes, birds in flight).
    • Frame rate as fast as the 40D (6.5 fps), or better.
    • Built-in wireless control.  Paying hundreds extra for an add-on device may have made sense ten years ago...
    • Weight no higher than needed.  "Feels solid" can be just an illusion.
    • The Mark II's 21 megapixels is already pretty good.  At some point you just waste storage space and transfer time.
    • If video features are added, they should NEVER get in the way of use as a still camera.
    • Wider dynamic range.  HDR from multiple exposures rarely gives what I want.
    • A price increase is to be expected, but I won't pay 1D-level prices.

    I'm asking a lot, but after all I have a perfectly good camera already.  A new one has to be compelling.

    Steve

26
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & More
« on: May 02, 2011, 03:35:25 PM »
Exactly what I wanted to hear!  I'm rarely limited by pixel resolution, but situations with moving subjects in weak light keep coming up.  A couple of stops higher ISO without an increase in noise will have me ordering on the first day possible.

Of course if I could get that in combination with the "frames per second" rate of my 40D, that would be even better.

Steve

Added: the noise reduction needs to start at the sensor.  Just processing it out in the Digic won't cut it.

27
Lenses / Re: Canon 70-200 f2.8 l usm
« on: March 08, 2011, 07:22:18 PM »
Wasted your money, no.  The lens you got is a fine piece of equipment.

For me, though, it would be the wrong choice.  I like really sharp results, and often end up with less light than I really want.  That happens frequently from indoor sports, to social events where a flash would be obtrusive, to dusk/dawn nature photography.  Having the IS is the key to getting some of those shots when the lens is already wide open (or close), ISO is as high as I can stand, and the shutter speed is still on the low side.

I'll partially disagree with an earlier poster about freezing motion.  IS won't stop motion blur, but it still helps to remove some of the other vibrations you get when panning with a moving subject.

Steve

28
EOS Bodies / Re: T3i vs. 60D
« on: March 03, 2011, 03:29:03 PM »
I have to echo the idea that ergonomics counts more than small differences in the specs.

Just an observation - more people complain about small grips than large ones.  People don't like plastic because they think it is "cheap".  People don't like heavy things.   But - you can't have something which is light, big, and made of heavy materials.

I was happy with the smaller grip on my Rebel (an older model), but I would not go back because of the control wheel on my x0D camera.  It has become essential to me.  Unlike most, I actually don't like the top LCD because you have to rotate the camera to see it, and on a tall tripod it can be impossible to use.

Final thought - if you like the 60D body style but not the price, consider a used 40D or 50D.  They are still great cameras.

Steve

Pages: 1 [2]