September 14, 2014, 10:02:53 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AprilForever

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 49
571
EOS Bodies / Re: Do I need a better camera or a better pair of hands?
« on: December 23, 2011, 04:13:09 PM »
True at times, but then there are wedding photographers hired expresssly for their look...

572
EOS Bodies / Re: How many of you would....
« on: December 23, 2011, 04:07:28 PM »
Pay $2995 for a 1d4 aps-h sensor in a 7d body?

No, I wouldn't. But, I would pay $4299 for an APS-C sensor in a 1D X body (with some noise improvements, 1D X-like AF but with an f/8 center point, 1D X metering and ergonomics).

Anyone else?

Neuro, I can't dispute that if an APS-C were released with 1d/5d level performance, there would certainly be interest in it. But right now that is a hypothetical sensor that would require new R&D and lead time. The 1d4 sensor is real and ready to go...and until the 1dx is released, is still Canon's best for events, sports and movies

If Nikon were to recycle their 12mp d3s sensor into the 700s with movie functionality in 2012, Canon would have their hands full.

I'm not certain why... The benefits of the D3s are more than just sensor...

573
EOS Bodies / Re: How many of you would....
« on: December 23, 2011, 02:58:19 PM »
Pay $2995 for a 1d4 aps-h sensor in a 7d body?

No, I wouldn't. But, I would pay $4299 for an APS-C sensor in a 1D X body (with some noise improvements, 1D X-like AF but with an f/8 center point, 1D X metering and ergonomics).

Anyone else?

I would try to.... might have to wait for a while until it got a bit cheaper, but I would be hugely interested in it...

574
EOS Bodies / Re: Do I need a better camera or a better pair of hands?
« on: December 23, 2011, 08:42:08 AM »
Indeed... Depends on whether the goal is a more literal representation or a more artistic rendering...

575
EOS Bodies / Re: How many of you would....
« on: December 23, 2011, 08:41:00 AM »
An ASP-C 1D4 would be great....

But an ASP-H 7D would be... unthinkable... unconscionable... unacceptable.

576
Lenses / Re: Canon 85mm 1.2LII vs Sigma 85mm 1.4
« on: December 23, 2011, 08:38:03 AM »
I'ma gonna have to get me a 85 1.4... at some point...

577
Lenses / Re: Lens suggestions
« on: December 23, 2011, 08:37:14 AM »
http://www.greatoutdoors.com/photogallery/art-wolfe-photographs-the-southern-ocean-and-south-georgia-island
Some of the wildlife/bird photos can be taken with a wide angle lens.  You just have to get really close.  See the above for some examples.
I think he communicates with the animals because they always seem skittish with me.  Amazing photos though.

I need to learn this skill!!! ;D

578
EOS Bodies / Re: How many of you would....
« on: December 23, 2011, 04:03:16 AM »
1. The 7D already has 8fps
2. The 7D already expands to 12800 ISO
3. The 7D's major draw: The 1.6x crop factor
4. The 7D's next major draw: 18 MP

The ASP-C is the poor man's teleconverter; loss of the 1.6x crop would make all my lenses shorter. Further compounding this problem would be the loss of resolution; unless they significantly increased the megapixel count, my crops would be weakened mightily. I use my 7D largely for bird photography; a 7Dmk II ASP-H would really not work as well for this. Further compounding the problem would be that my ef-s lenses would not work. And, yes, I have several... 

However, what Dr. Croubie mentioned:

18MP 7D aps-c sensor, 1D4 gripped body, well sealed, 45pt AF with f/8, long-life shutter, 10fps and buffer to match, dual cardslots, 7-shot bracketing

I would totally buy one of these...

579
EOS Bodies / Re: Earthshatteringly Disappointed With 7D
« on: December 22, 2011, 04:52:47 PM »
17 page thread in such a short space of time not relating to a new announcement or release...

Well Done :D

My 7D is an emotional matter! :)

580
EOS Bodies / Re: The rift between the vocal "ISOers" and the "MPers"...
« on: December 22, 2011, 01:21:04 PM »
If Nikon puts out a 36mp camera in a pro level body, then I'd expect it to be good!  I think that 36mp is approaching the area where with todays technology noise will be acceptable.  If not, they won't make it.

I'm always in favor of seeing different manufacturers develop new products and offer options.  It would really be boring if they were all the same, photographers need a choice.

Still, as long as I get enough pixels to crop my FF image, I'd go for low noise and better light sensitivity if that was a option.  I did not get a D3S because 12 mp did not meet that criteria, but 18mp does.

Ahhh... the joys of competition in the free market world... If they do make one, I can't wait to see the "I'm switching to Nikon" threads popping up!  ;D Seriously, though, tech progresses, and perhaps, our grandchildren's grandchildren may not even know what SLR means...

581
EOS Bodies / Re: Earthshatteringly Disappointed With 7D
« on: December 22, 2011, 01:06:48 PM »
If you're shooting with a deep DoF, such as at f/8, focus errors are masked quite well.  But as I stated in that other thread (apologies for repeating myself), most people expect a $2K+ camera to focus accurately even with a shallow DoF.  Speaking for myself, I certainly didn't buy a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 135mm f/2L, or 85mm f/1.2L II to 'f/8 and be there.'

Good point there.  This is why I am looking forward so much to the 1DX for its AF capability in those situation.  In the mean time though, I will try your suggestion to focus at F8 and see if I can catch my little girl!

Use f8 on people pictures only if your reason is to ensure adequate depth of field or to balance flash ratios (this happens a lot in studios and other controlled pictures...)

For a running child, take a lot of pictures with shallow deoth of field and LEARN how to use shallow dof to your advantage... By the way, at f8, you'll need a flash too for any indoor picture... or mad high ISO... or both... If you want natural pictures. learn how to use your lenses, don't rely on crutches.

When I use f8 when taking pictures of birds, it is because I am taking pictures of large birds in flight (herons and egrets), and am doing so in broad daylight. I usually want both wing and beak in focus, so this is necessary. But for a child? all you need is an eye in focus! And sometimes, not even that! The purpose for your pictures is the emotional connection to the memory, not technical image quality. "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." (Henri Cartier-Bresson)

582
EOS Bodies / Re: Do I need a better camera or a better pair of hands?
« on: December 22, 2011, 12:54:33 PM »
Watch out for too shallow DOF ( #3 )

I actually like the shallow DOF on #3...

I think the keyword here is "too"--the shallow DoF is nice, but a half inch to an inch so deeper might be a little better effect, IMHO.  Hard to say for sure without comparing directly.  When I'm uncertain with this kind of shot, I'll just shoot 2 frames with the second one stopped down a bit and then I can decide which is better after the fact.  Of course this could just be do to my lack of experience.

An eye is in focus, what more do you need?  ;D

Anyway, as Henri Cartier-Bresson said, "Sharpness is a Bourgeois concept."  8)

583
Lenses / Re: How do you correct chromatic aberrations?
« on: December 22, 2011, 12:51:11 PM »
I rarely bother to, unless it is severe, in which case I use Lightroom's or PS's functions for it... I rarely have much CA, though... Due to lens choices and subject, prolly... and likely partly due to not really caring a lot about it...

584
EOS Bodies / Re: Do I need a better camera or a better pair of hands?
« on: December 21, 2011, 10:36:33 PM »
Watch out for too shallow DOF ( #3 )

Give them space ( #3)

Avoid taking pictures up the nose ( #2, #5 )

Avoid taking wa pictures - unless they are very wa when it is obvious that is what you are aiming for

The 7D is nore than good enough for weddings but you will have to work on the pp to get the best images

5DII, 1Ds3, 1D4 are the only other options and they will introduce new issues, including a big cost.

Just remember that a wedding albumn is reportage, 90% 'standard' images, 10% 'artistic' images. Keep focussed on the standard images as they wont forgive you if the picture of mum and pop look bad.

I actually like the shallow DOF on #3...

585
Lenses / Re: Why no fixed Super-Tele-Lenses for APS-C?
« on: December 19, 2011, 10:38:51 AM »
Well, there is  200 2.8 which is usually pretty cheap, and, as mentioned above, the 300 f4 IS is also really cheap...

A 500 5.6 would be great, but Canon will likely never make one. Perhaps sigma could hook us up? Actually, I think they sell a 500 F4.5, but I think it doesn't have OS, sooo........

Would I love EF-S 600 F4? Indeed. Will we e'er see one? Never. However, a 600 f8 which lies to the camera and says it is only 2.8 so you can still use a 2x TC in broad daylight would be really nice...

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 49