May 21, 2013, 08:13:05 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fotografiasi

Pages: 1 [2]
16
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8L IS II vs f/4L IS
« on: February 03, 2012, 05:15:03 PM »
Crapking's idea is really good

I own the 70-200 2.8 is ii and i use it on a 50D. I also tried the 70-200 4 is that a friend owns. Now what you choose depends entirely on you, where you want to use the lens and why. Of course the 2.8 is ii is better but also more expensive, heavy and large. The 4 is looks like a toy compared to the 2.8 is ii, but is much lighter, smaller and less expensive.

Now, if you are going to use the lens for yourself, for your soul, choose the 4 is, because it will be much more easy to take it with you and use it. Doing this the chances to use the new lens will increase dramatically and you will be happier with the new acquisition.

If you are going to use this lens for professional purposes, taking photos not only for you but also for other people, the things change. This is not 100% true, there are also exceptions. But if you have to deliver photos to a client, you have to do it in the best way possible. Now I do not say that the 4 is does not perform... it does, and it does it very well.

If you need a long lens just for portraiture buy the 135 L. It is great. I also tested it. I like the quality it delivers and the lighter package it comes in. Superb lens.

It all depends on you, what you want this lens for.

17
EOS Bodies / Re: The New EOS [CR3]
« on: October 17, 2011, 07:25:17 PM »
I am  :o and to much  ::) expecting the new release from Canon. I thought that the eos-1v is what they jsut released  :D

18
EOS Bodies / Re: The New EOS [CR3]
« on: October 17, 2011, 07:22:02 PM »
this eos-1V is a weird camera. It has 45 AF point from which only 7 are cross type. The 7 are arranged in in center from top to bottom so it does not seem a great improvement from the 5D mk ii. It would have been good to have the cross type point arranged in cross, so at least 2 to be available on the extreme left and right. The area the AF points take seems to be the same as with the 1Ds mk iii, so they are not really spread but stay in the center. I am still trying to understand what the Japanese said

19
Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Event Photography - Post here.
« on: October 16, 2011, 09:35:48 AM »
Magda is singing/performing at Lucian and Ramona's wedding in front of all the guests

20
Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Black & White - Post Here.
« on: October 16, 2011, 09:30:27 AM »
Bogdanel...

21
Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* People - Post Here.
« on: October 16, 2011, 09:29:30 AM »
Bogdanel...

22
Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Landscape - Post Here.
« on: October 16, 2011, 09:22:44 AM »
lovely colorful sunset in Iasi Romania from the top of the place I live in

23
Canon General / Re: After-market Focusing Screens
« on: September 18, 2011, 03:06:22 AM »
please let us know what you bought and how does it work out for you

24
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon 85mm f/1.8
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:02:33 AM »
great lens indeed and not that pricey. A photo from my first wedding of this year that I took using my old trusty 85 1.8...


25
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF135mm f/2L USM
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:00:15 AM »
I really like Sun Drops and It's Beautiful to Be by Fesapo.

Very nice lens indeed the 135L. I borrowed it for a wedding photoshoot until my 70-200 2.8 is II comes next week. Here's one if the photos (touch of a kiss)...






26
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: May 23, 2011, 09:08:43 AM »
I do not think that this is my best landscape, but for sure it is the last one I managed to take a photo of. I took the photo while going down with the chairlift from the top of the mountain. The scenery is from Gura Humorului, Suceava county, Romania

27
Lenses / Re: Lens for 50D?
« on: April 11, 2011, 07:14:11 AM »
My recommendation for you is to get the Canon 28 1.8. It's 530$. You'll not regret the choice. The next step is the Canon 85 1.8. Don't waste your money on that zooms. Latter when you'll move to full frame those lenses would still work and will smooth the transition. Doing it in this way the lost money in the process will be most minimized, but most important is the skill you will develop

28
Lenses / Re: 24 - 70 f/2.8 L : When Is The New Version Expected?
« on: November 29, 2010, 12:00:57 PM »
I also tested both 17-55 2.8 IS and the 24-70 2.8 on my 50D. 3 people looked at the photos and the 17-55 produced a ted better photos. So until Canon does not come with a better lens for FF I will not switch to FF

29
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 580 EX II hotshoe problem
« on: November 29, 2010, 11:57:48 AM »
It happened to me also, and when tilted to the back. It would just not fire. I tried different modes on the camera and it did not work. I had to put it in the "normal" position and after a few miss-fired ones the flash started to work

30
Lenses / Re: Which Lens Are You Looking Forward To?
« on: September 01, 2010, 05:26:24 AM »
besides the 135 2 L IS I am also waiting for the 200 2.8 L IS. The new 70-200 2.8 is II is very close to the 200 2.8 but also very expensive for me. I would buy the 200 2.8 if it would have IS. I do weddings and I can not walk around with a monopod

Pages: 1 [2]