April 19, 2014, 01:04:23 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - max

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Samyang 24mm f/3.5 Tilt-Shift Announced
« on: September 10, 2012, 12:12:20 PM »
If it costs 1.000 i think you are better off buying a TS-E 24mm f/3.5L version I in the used market for 800-900 bucks.

32
Lenses / Re: *UPDATE* Canon EF 135 f/1.8L IS
« on: August 02, 2012, 11:57:03 AM »
I was preordering!

33
EOS Bodies / Re: Hands-on Video of the Canon EOS M (Italy)
« on: July 22, 2012, 11:37:26 PM »
yes, they say master flash, not RT, just flash activated... Like the 60D-7D etc...

35
I work at weddings and it drives me nuts!!

Where do I sign?

36
Lenses / Re: The Shorty Forty MTF Chart Comparison
« on: June 08, 2012, 10:06:09 AM »
yeah but it is f/2.8...

37
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: The 5D Mark III Fix
« on: May 02, 2012, 12:45:55 PM »

38
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon is getting owned in sensor technology
« on: April 19, 2012, 12:11:47 PM »
Canon used to always say its because they have higher MP that the test giveout those numbers... Now Nikon has the bigger MP and Canon still loses...

i don´t think they have made it easyer for average joe.

to fully understand the score you have to know what they are testing.

because DXO is based on resized images and noise threshold.
it´s a normalized test.

but then why buy a 36 MP camera if you normalize to a lower resolution?
because you can resample an image?
well yes you can resample to 8MP.... but that is not why i would buy a 36MP camera.

the DXO score is only a true representation if you resample/normalize the RAW image.

don´t get me wrong i think the DXO test IS usefull in some way.. just not in the way most interpret it.


Quote
Numbers don't lie

lol.. you are not that naive are you?
statistics lie all day.. it´s a matter how you test.

do you really think the D4 is only marginal better in low light? than i feel truly sorry for you.
but trust me not one experienced photographer, nikon or not, will be fooled by the numbers.


beside that... it´s a SONY sensor.
so if you want to praise a company.. praise the right one.

39
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Split? 5D X & 5D Mark III [CR1]
« on: March 01, 2012, 04:12:50 PM »
This seemed to be spot on for the 5D III

40
EOS Bodies / Re: The new 5D Mark III ?!?! PICS!
« on: February 28, 2012, 09:33:26 AM »
Are we there yet?  :D

Would the existing 7D users sell off your current 7D's after you buy the 5D3, if the AF of 5D3 can match the 7D?

AF points in a cropped frame almost reach the border of the image... On a FF AF points are cramped in the middle... (they are actually the same but the area that is cropped out makes it seem like that)

41
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Split? 5D X & 5D Mark III [CR1]
« on: February 10, 2012, 10:52:37 AM »
Sign me up for a 5D3

42
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon promises a 'mirrorless' camera in 2012
« on: January 09, 2012, 09:51:55 AM »
Canon just released the G1X with a sensor bigger than the micro 4/3, looks awesome!

43
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Lens Mug - Giveaway
« on: August 31, 2011, 02:46:54 PM »
a direct 3D print! ::)

44
Contests / Re: Holga Giveaway
« on: July 19, 2011, 09:12:24 AM »
I would like to play with these!!

45
EOS Bodies / Re: 3D (Again) & 5D Mark III (CR1)
« on: June 14, 2011, 04:41:20 PM »
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Canon took their model names off in an altogether different direction - possibly dropping the 'D' part altogether.


So the new camera would be an EOS 3?  Why does that name seem familiar??



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4