October 24, 2014, 11:01:32 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - brad-man

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 50
61
Canon General / Re: Neutral Density Filters - HELP !
« on: July 31, 2014, 06:19:12 PM »
I just bought a Lee filter system and I am really shocked about the build quality of that system. The adapter ring has a faulty finish with markings on it, which then were fixed with a pen as a cover up. After returning that adapter ring I got another one just like it. I conacted the manufacturer which explained to me that these markings are caused in the manufacturing process, quote: "The marks inside the ring are voids left during the anodising process. The rings are suspended in the solution by small wire 'hangers' and these leave voids where they touch the metal."
This I never have seen from any other manufacturer.
See picture for this.
Above all my 0.9 ND pro glass came with tiny specles of yellow finish on the glass right under the yellow label. This goes well 30mm into the middle of the glass. On a glass worth of 200 Euros. Also not what I would call high end. This is just bad quality so far. I haven't given up on it completely but one more of this stuff not gone through the quality control or badly produced and I will send the whole shabbang back.

As you have supplied wonderful photos of Lees shoddy workmanship in the manufacturing of your filter system, could you please supply a photo that was ruined by this inferior system?

No? I didn't think so.

@ OP: Agree with others who recommend Lee Filter System. Though they are pricey at the start, if you're in this picture thing for the long haul, they are actually the best investment for quality and versatility.

62
Hi folks.
There is a water and object ingress standard at least in Europe, IP XX, where the first number stands for objects and the second for water, I  think it was something like IP 00 means you can get an industry standard finger in there, and water that runs in runs out and IP 67 means that dust has to be below so many microns and you can pressure wash the item and water won't get in.. This is just from memory so feel free to correct me!
Anyway back to the point if it doesn't say IP XX on the label it isn't weather or water resistant!

Cheers Graham.

Agree. That is the standard most commonly used in America as well as internationally. Most of my flashlights are IPX7 ;D  Camera manufacturers simply choose to not use them.

 IPX Standard Code Meanings

 IPX-0     No special protection
 IPX-1     Protected against falling water Equivalent to 3-5mm rainfall per minute for a duration of 10 minutes.
 IPX-2     Protected against falling water when tilted up to 15 degrees – Same as IPX-1 but unit is tested in 4      fixed positions – tilted 15 degrees in each direction from normal operating position.
 IPX-3     Protected against spraying water – Water spraying up to 60 degrees from vertical at 10 liters/min at a pressure of 80-100kN/m2 for 5 min.
 IPX-4     Protected against splashing water – Same as IPX-3 but water is sprayed at all angles.
 IPX-5     Protected against water jets – Water projected at all angles through a 6.3mm nozzle flow rate of 12.5 liters/min at a pressure of 30kN/m2 for 3 minutes from a distance of 3 meters.
 IPX-6     Protected against heavy seas – Water projected at all angles through a 12.5mm nozzle at a flow rate of 100 liters/min at a 100kN/m2pressure for 3 minutes from a distance of 3 meters.
 IPX-7     Protected against water immersion – Immersion for 30 minutes at a depth of 1 meter.
 IPX-8     Protected against water submersion – Equipment suitable for continual submersion in water under conditions as specified by manufacturer.

63
Canon General / Re: What do you Cheap Out On?
« on: July 28, 2014, 11:28:27 PM »
Somebody make some popcorn...batteries. I have 4 genuine Canon LP-E6s and 4 or 5 generics. With the exception of one clone prematurely wearing out, I am unable to see a difference in performance that would in any way justify the price difference.

64
Software & Accessories / Re: RRS or Markins?
« on: July 28, 2014, 04:55:18 PM »

Markins generally is thought of as not playing well with other gear. 

I have the Markins Q3 on Gitzo monopod and the Q10 on Gitzo tripod. 7D with RRS L-Plate and 2 lens with collars and RRS lens plates and never had an issue with compatibility.

That quote is completely unfounded and undoubtedly came from someone who has never used a Markins...

65
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D now marked as DISCONTINUED at Amazon
« on: July 26, 2014, 07:10:28 PM »
I wonder if this means they're still on track for a September release.  Although sooner would be cool, I don't think it being out of stock at Amazon means that it will be released any sooner.  It might be construed as further evidence that the September release rumours are accurate though.  :)

7D replacement will likely be announced at Photokina in September. Availability is another matter.

66
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Where do you buy 5D Mark iii?
« on: July 21, 2014, 11:01:56 PM »
Refurbished 5D mark iii is out of stock the most of the time. At least I couldn't catch one in stock.

Looking at canonpricewatch.com how do I know if camera has full USA warranty?

Because canonpricewatch says it is. They have a sort of pool of authorized dealers who are willing to discount, but they can't advertise the price for fear of the wrath of canon. Just fill out the form and you'll get an offer from an authorized seller for the low price with full USA warranty.

67
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Where do you buy 5D Mark iii?
« on: July 21, 2014, 07:51:19 PM »
Currently the mk lll can be had for $2600 from a reliable but unauthorized reseller (likely an import model) or $2700 for full USA warranty.

http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/03868/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-price.html?streetprice

68
Software & Accessories / Re: Benro heads
« on: July 18, 2014, 08:58:44 PM »
Which tripod are you referring to?  I've seen lots of feedback from Amazon users complaining that heads will not fit on their tripod which has a 1/4 inch screw and was not intended to have a head attached to it.

You will need tripod legs, not a complete tripod that a camera mounts on if you want to install your own head.

I apologize if you already know this, but if not, you might be disappointed.

BTW, having a head that causes a expensive 70-200mm lens to flop over because it doesn't lock or hold its position might become a very expensive one if your lens flops down and takes camera with it onto the pavement.

The two that I have need to be tightened with a wrench to keep them locked in place.

You're quite thrifty. I would throw such heads away :)

69
Software & Accessories / Re: Benro heads
« on: July 18, 2014, 05:53:25 PM »
;D ;D ;D

thanks i know it's not that good but that what i have , so these heads will work on this tripod will they fit right

They will fit fine. They both have a standard 3/8 inch mounting bolt/receiver. Do check out ebay for better prices on new Benro gear though.

70
Canon General / Re: New Speedlite Coming? [CR2]
« on: July 17, 2014, 06:23:03 PM »
"A brief mention that we could see a new Speedlite announced with the EOS 7D replacement in September"

This is a CR2?  It's probably a white 430 for the fashion concious :P

71
Technical Support / Re: Landscare photography and bicycling
« on: July 14, 2014, 12:27:40 AM »
Have a look at the Tamrac Velocity series bags. They carry like a sling and have a stowable waist strap for more aggressive riding. They are very stout and give a decent amount of protection without being too clunky. I have the Velocity 8 which will handle 5D + 70-200 2.8. If your not going telephoto, you can get away with a 6 or 7.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/962822-REG/tamrac_577873_velocity_8z_photo_sling.html

72
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II [CR1]
« on: July 12, 2014, 04:39:18 PM »
Rotating zoom ring

Bummer.  :(

You'd prefer one that wouldn't rotate?   :P

Despite the controversy, I rather like my push pull 100-400.  Never had a dust problem...  I would welcome faster AF.  That's the only downside I have experienced with mine.  I would be (pleasantly) surprised if the price is $2400.

I'm pretty happy with the AF speed and sharpness of mine, though there's always room for improvement. As it's not a particularly fast lens, I will enjoy the updated IS. I have no problem with the push/pull design, so the jury is out on whether a rotational zoom will be better or worse.

73
Pricewatch Deals / Re: EOS M + 18-55mm for $250!
« on: July 12, 2014, 04:18:05 PM »
For anyone who missed the last fire sale on this nifty little gem, you get a second chance. 6th Ave on ebay are also selling the EF-M 22 f/2 STM for $108. $360 for this (almost) pocketable kit is an outstanding offer.

M + EF-M 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/191236048048?item=191236048048&lgeo=1&vectorid=229466

EF-M 22 f/2 STM:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-EF-M-22mm-f-2-STM-Lens-New/201021224962?rt=nc

Does anyone have any experience in dealing with this firm?

I'm thinking of getting this deal and would appreciate any feedback you may have.

I know I have purchased from them in the past, though I don't remember what it was. Regardless, they have over a 99% positive feedback on over 23,000 sales. It it is safe to assume that the items will be gray market/white box and not covered by Canon USA warranty (though they may be), but the seller offers a one year warranty anyway. If you want an M, this is as good an offer as you are likely to find. I highly recommend the 22 with this camera. It is truly a great little lens and very useful in dimmer situations.

74
Pricewatch Deals / EOS M + 18-55mm for $250!
« on: July 11, 2014, 10:01:41 PM »
For anyone who missed the last fire sale on this nifty little gem, you get a second chance. 6th Ave on ebay are also selling the EF-M 22 f/2 STM for $108. $360 for this (almost) pocketable kit is an outstanding offer.

M + EF-M 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/191236048048?item=191236048048&lgeo=1&vectorid=229466

EF-M 22 f/2 STM:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-EF-M-22mm-f-2-STM-Lens-New/201021224962?rt=nc

75
Lenses / Re: Need help deciding on my next lens
« on: July 09, 2014, 06:54:25 PM »
Thanks, y'all! The 15-85 wasn't even on my list, but it looks promising and is well within my budget.

I think I'll end up renting the 15-85, 10-22 and the 24-105 for a weekend so I can play with all three and see what I end up liking best. I'm leaning more toward the 15-85 and the 10-22 now since they're made specifically for a crop sensor and are much less expensive.

The 15-85 and the 10-22 are excellent choices. Combined with the lenses you already own (sell the Sigma ;)), you will have wide to moderate telephoto very well covered. If you're not in a hurry, wait for canon to have a sale on their refurbished lenses. Very recently the 10-22 was going for $400 which is a silly good price. The 15-85 can be had for around $550. A great site to keep track of all prices Canon is http://www.canonpricewatch.com/.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 50