November 23, 2014, 08:37:08 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jesse

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 15
136
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L vs 135mm 2.0L
« on: December 11, 2012, 12:07:49 PM »
"When you are talking about the same framing, focal length and subject distance have equal and opposite effects, and thus they cancel each other out.  When comparing lenses of different focal lengths for the same framing, DoF is determined only by aperture.  So at f/2.8 for the same framing, there's no DoF difference between the 100mm Macro and the 135L, but the 135L can open up to f/2 meaning it can achieve a shallower DoF for the same framing."

Mind blown. So would this work for all lenses? Eg. a 24mm and 200mm?

137
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L vs 135mm 2.0L
« on: December 10, 2012, 03:02:55 PM »
Interesting. Well I sold my 100 2.0 for the 100L because its hybrid IS makes it one of the best lenses for video.

138
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L vs 135mm 2.0L
« on: December 10, 2012, 01:18:44 PM »
Everyone here always says the non-L macro is identical in sharpness to the L version. I've never seen any real evidence to this.

139
Lenses / Re: 16-35L or related primes
« on: December 09, 2012, 10:39:04 PM »
I would rather have the Canon 14mm + 24mm 1.4 + 35mm over the 16-35 any day, but I'm not super rich.

140
Lenses / Re: Why no L primes from 14 to 24mm
« on: December 09, 2012, 05:29:03 PM »
Again, the Zeiss 21mm. One of the best wide angle lenses available.

141
Lenses / Re: Why no L primes from 14 to 24mm
« on: December 09, 2012, 01:00:49 PM »
14 and 24 are not in between 14 and 24....

142
Lenses / Re: Why no L primes from 14 to 24mm
« on: December 09, 2012, 11:58:29 AM »
Zeiss 21mm

143
Lenses / Re: New Tilt-Shift Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 08, 2012, 11:45:01 AM »
They'll be about $2000 and worth every penny.

144
Lenses / Re: New Tilt-Shift Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 08, 2012, 11:42:36 AM »
woooooooo!!!!

145
Landscape / Re: Seeking sky advice
« on: December 06, 2012, 08:18:30 PM »
No one ever notices diffraction.

146
Lenses / Re: Best lenses for canon 5D mark iii or 6D
« on: December 06, 2012, 08:15:27 PM »
5D3 + 24-70 II + 70-200 II

147
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Canon C100 praise & annoyances
« on: December 06, 2012, 04:19:32 PM »
hahahah

148
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D MkIII instructions - Rant !!
« on: December 06, 2012, 02:55:52 PM »
Most pointless thread and most pointless rant ever?







Yes.

149
Canon General / Re: What real Pros shoot...
« on: December 04, 2012, 04:21:37 PM »
Clearly IQ isn't the most important thing in photojournalism. It's all about capturing stories. Canon is great for this because of the speed and ergonomics. Some of those pictures aren't the greatest compositionally, creatively, etc, but they tell a story. Obviously stats from say studio photographers are going to be totally different.

Pretty obvious stuff, and I don't even know anything. 

150
Canon General / Re: What real Pros shoot...
« on: December 04, 2012, 11:31:17 AM »
By pros you mean pro photo-journalists.

I'm surprised how popular the 16-35 is with them compared to the 24-70.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 15