October 30, 2014, 03:09:22 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jesse

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 15
76
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Camera in 2014
« on: February 07, 2013, 02:56:14 AM »
Gimme my 45mm TS-E L !!!

77
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L Macro IS as a portrait lens
« on: January 30, 2013, 04:54:29 PM »
What do I know though, I bought the 100L because it's the best lens for video out there.

78
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L Macro IS as a portrait lens
« on: January 30, 2013, 04:43:54 PM »
"In the end, there is nothing the 100mm macro can do for portraits that the 70-200LII cannot do."

eye portraits, yo

79
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L Macro IS as a portrait lens
« on: January 30, 2013, 04:29:16 PM »
Also, not every portrait is shot wide open. I don't think you're going to get much bokeh if you're shooting in a studio with a black backdrop shooting at f/11.

80
Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L Macro IS as a portrait lens
« on: January 30, 2013, 04:27:35 PM »
RL, people are able to create equally good portraits with either the 135L or the 100L because gear doesn't matter.


......

81
PowerShot / Re: A camera for backpacking into the wilderness...
« on: January 29, 2013, 02:27:14 AM »
Ditch the kid. Put the $1500 towards the 24mm TS-E L. Have a blast.

82
PowerShot / Re: New PowerShots for CP+, no DSLRs.
« on: January 29, 2013, 02:06:11 AM »
Uggggh, announce the new tilt shifts and UWA zoom!!!!!!!! And 50 IS.

83
Technical Support / Re: at what shutter speed you turn IS off?
« on: January 27, 2013, 06:36:32 PM »
IS - one of the topics where it seems like no one has any idea what they're talking about.

84
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Roadmap for 2013 [CR2]
« on: January 27, 2013, 05:53:48 PM »
Only 4 lenses?

Better include 45mm TS-E L
14-24L
50 1.4 IS

85
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: January 25, 2013, 02:49:47 AM »

86
Haha, nice debate I stirred here. For the record, if I could afford both the 70-200 II and the 85L I'd definitely shoot this with the 85. Obviously a zoom isn't needed in this situation. And anyone who can't shoot a portrait in focus at 7.1 with the 85L shouldn't be shooting the president.


87
Well, anyway, as Vincent Laforet says in his blog, there is NO reason to own the 85L if you're not shooting it between 1.2 - 2.0, as you might as well own the 70-200 II for only a few hundred $ more, with the ability to have the versatility of the zoom, much faster auto-focus, IS and pretty much equal sharpness.

If you can afford both, well, I'm jealous of you.

88
And wouldn't have to worry about messing up focus on the president.

89
I'm just jealous I can't afford the 85L, but can get the exact same shot with my 70-200 L f/4....

90
Yeah, my point is he should have been using the 70-200 II.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 15