August 28, 2014, 11:36:55 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bvukich

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 46
586
Lenses / Re: 24-70 II in April? [CR2]
« on: March 08, 2011, 07:14:32 PM »
They may get released at the same time (would be nice), but the 24-70 is too expensive, and too specialized to be a kit lens.

I would suspect that most people that would get the kit would be significantly less likely to own any existing L glass, and would need a high quality general purpose lens. The 24-105 f4L IS is a much better (subjective, I know) general purpose lens, and what they would benefit the most from having if it's their only L.

587
Animal Kingdom / Re: First trials with the amazing 7D
« on: March 08, 2011, 02:55:23 PM »
P.S., Congrats on the camera, and that's a beautiful dog you have.

588
Animal Kingdom / Re: First trials with the amazing 7D
« on: March 08, 2011, 02:54:19 PM »
To expand on what kubelik and scalesusa said, hold on to that kit lens for a little bit.  Practice, learn the camera, and the craft as a whole.  On that journey you will also learn what you need in a lens to fulfill your goals.

It's real easy to say the 18-135 is less than the perfect lens, but a lot harder to say what is the perfect lens for you.  Everyone is quick to spit out an opinion; and yes, the guidance you receive can be valuable; but it's ultimately up to you to determine what is best.

589
Lenses / Re: Canon 70-200 f2.8 l usm
« on: March 08, 2011, 02:44:15 PM »
...which I kept and disposed of the others.

I'd love to be your garbage man. :)

590
Lenses / Re: 24-70 II in April? [CR2]
« on: March 08, 2011, 01:39:33 PM »
I still think the logical thing to do (which almost precludes it from happening), is for them to split the line.  Bring out a 24-70/2.8 II with greater resolving power to match modern sensor densities, and a 24-70/2.8 IS version for those that need it.  It's a good strategy for the 70-200/2.8, makes just as much sense on the 24-70.  I also strongly believe the 16-35/2.8 could benefit from this as well.

In the f/4 space though, and I'm primarily thinking of the 24-105/4 IS here, while I think that lens could also use an update, I don't see room in the lineup for a non-IS version.  In fact I'm really hoping to see a MkII released as a kit lens for the 5D3.

Along the same line, I don't see why there's a non-IS version of the 70-200/4, besides historical context.  So maybe I'm just way off base.

591
EOS Bodies / Re: Odds and Ends
« on: March 07, 2011, 02:40:24 PM »
what is a TYPO ??

It's short for a typographical error.

In a modern context would generally mean someone typed it in wrong.  In a historical context would often be a typesetting or transcription error when framing the movable metal characters that make up a page of text.

592
Canon EF-S and EF-M Lenses / Re: Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
« on: March 06, 2011, 06:42:22 PM »
Amazing.  Not even sure what else to say.

593
EOS Bodies / Re: The 7d with an aps-h sensor!!!!!!!!
« on: March 01, 2011, 02:11:23 PM »
If the next generation 1D is FF, then moving the 7DMk2 to APS-H almost makes sense.

If the next 1D isn't APS-H, then it makes even less sense.  A one off sensor is an expensive luxury on a $5k camera,  and a non-starter on a $1300 camera.

594
United States / Re: Bait and Switch Camera shops fined
« on: February 28, 2011, 06:40:01 PM »
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

595
Software & Accessories / Re: Light Peak on EOS digital
« on: February 25, 2011, 01:30:20 PM »
I don't think I've transfered pictures off a card while it's still in the camera but twice, maybe three times.

I'd rather have a good, fast, card reader that I can use for all my cards/cameras.  Why pay extra to integrate it into every camera, if the current USB2 connections are more than adequate for occasional use?

596
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM?
« on: February 25, 2011, 12:02:19 PM »
P.S.  Sorry, I meant to add: I've decided I'm going to buy this lens.  I'm waiting until April and if there is nothing definitive about an update, I'm going to buy the current version.

If a new version is released in conjunction with a 5DM3, I will probably buy the kit hoping to save a few bucks on both the camera and the lens.

It would be nice, but I doubt the 5D3 will have this as a kit lens; especially with IS it would just be too expensive of a lens, and would probably put the kit in the $3800-4000 range.  I think an updated 24-105/4L would be much more likely.

597
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM?
« on: February 25, 2011, 09:18:57 AM »
"Rumors of it's replacement have been greatly exaggerated" - Mark Twain

But seriously, there have been rumors for at least 3 years that it is being replaced/upgraded with IS, etc.  I honestly think they'll eventually release both a new version, and a version with IS.  When?  No one but Canon knows.

If you need the lens, I would get it now.  If the new version is worth upgrading to, you probably wont lose much (5% ?) when you sell yours since the new version will surely be significantly more expensive.

598
Portrait / Re: Let There Be Light!
« on: February 24, 2011, 03:52:36 AM »
I especially like the second one (photoshopped in rain and all :) )

599
EOS Bodies / Re: 60D & 7D Rebates coming February 20
« on: February 21, 2011, 09:54:43 AM »
... I should snag it now for the best Sub $500 price I can find ...

At that price I'll take three :)

600
Sports / Re: Monster Jam 2011
« on: February 21, 2011, 12:57:39 AM »
Wow, those look infinitely better than mine.

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 46