July 29, 2014, 01:53:49 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TexPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 59
586
Lenses / Re: Where do you sell used lenses
« on: March 03, 2012, 07:41:25 PM »
When I lived in a major city, i would try craigslist first, then go to eBay.

Now I live pretty far from any city, so i just go straight to eBay.  The fees stink, but I walkways get more than I could feel it to a store for, even after the fees.

587
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon 400 f/2.8 IS
« on: March 03, 2012, 07:37:56 PM »

Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr

588
EOS Bodies / Re: 5DIII pre-order thread
« on: March 02, 2012, 08:47:33 PM »
I ordered both the body and the kit in 2 separate orders at about 2AM from B&H.  Both receipts said I pre-ordered it.  Checking online they both say  "back-ordered".

I have a 24-105mm but thought i should replace it, and sell my older lens with my 5D II.   I think I will cancel the body order.   

I ordered the 5DII kit about a week after it was introduced.  I got it about 3 weeks after it started shipping. 

589
EOS Bodies / Re: Biggest Hardware Issue still not fixed?
« on: March 01, 2012, 07:42:05 PM »
I lined the edges of my 5D II grip with electrical tape and this firmed up the connection, no problems in 3 years of shooting with it.

But of course, if you lay your hands on the built-in vertical grip of an EOS 1, or Nikon D_, you'll realize how much add-on grips suck.

590
EOS Bodies / Re: The (un)official I'm switching to Nikon thread
« on: February 29, 2012, 02:51:26 PM »
I am opening a home for unwanted Cannon bodies lenses and flashes.  Please send them postage paid to my house where they will treated with dignity.  L lenses and recent FF bodies (completely useless because of the D800) will be given a special shelf.

591
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon 400 f/2.8 IS
« on: February 28, 2012, 10:59:43 PM »

IMG_7419 by TexPhoto, on Flickr


IMG_2205 by TexPhoto, on Flickr

592
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Canon 5D MK ll grip with AA's
« on: February 27, 2012, 07:31:55 PM »
I've shot 2000+ photos on a single LP-E6 more than once, it's tough to wear one out on a single shoot.  I'd just use the AA's as a back-up, or better yet, get a second LP-E6.

593
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Eneloop batteries for my flash
« on: February 26, 2012, 11:29:34 PM »
I have 2 sets.  I keep one in my flash, and one in the charger.  Never really needed to keep them anyplace else.

594
EOS Bodies / Re: 16 bit color anyone?
« on: February 25, 2012, 09:29:25 AM »
I'd love to have 16 bit color, if the camera was actually able to resolve color to that level.  But considering the bayer interpolation our sensors use to take color from the neighboring sensors (before the RAW image is recorded), I can't see the camera actually reading color to that depth. 

595
Landscape / Re: Post your best HDR Photographs
« on: February 24, 2012, 05:41:32 AM »

596
Lenses / Re: How is the 24mm TS-E V1?
« on: February 23, 2012, 12:12:04 PM »
I've owned both, and the mark I is well, OK.  It is not real sharp in the corners, and the more you shift away from center, the more the corner shifts towards the center.  Tilting was something I did not use much.  If I was shooting a landscape and wanted the bushes and mountain in focus, I stopped down...   I did shoot some cool tilt videos for that "miniature" effect.

On a crop camera this might be fine.  on FF, i thought the results from my 24-105 shot at 24 (or 35, or...) then "fixed" in Photoshop to have straight lines, were just as sharp.  If I was going to do that, why carry it?

The VII is decidedly better. 

597
EOS Bodies / Re: The Next 5D on February 27/28, 2012 [CR3]
« on: February 22, 2012, 06:01:08 PM »
If those are indeed the specs, I will hang onto my 5DII and put the money towards Pizza and Beer, I mean lenses.


598
Sports / Re: Surfing photos
« on: February 22, 2012, 04:10:16 PM »

Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr

599
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400mm f4 lens - worth waiting for?
« on: February 22, 2012, 08:15:59 AM »
One pro photographer I know uses the Nikon 200-400 exclusively for his long lens wildlife work and loves it.  Canon does not put out lousy lenses, or slap an "L" on it.  But why don't we wait and see.

The Sigma 120-300 f2.8 plus 1.4X or even 2X sounds like an interesting alternative.

600
United States / Re: One Week Away From FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
« on: February 21, 2012, 05:21:26 PM »
New camera or not, i have to agree it will be Feb 28 in a week. that is CR3 in my book.

I think we will see a new camera or 2 in the near future, 0-3 months.  It will be awesome, but will not outclass the 1DX, as a few people seem to be wishing for.  And My 5D2 is hanging tough in the mean time. 


Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 59