September 18, 2014, 09:47:04 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - docsmith

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 19
106
Software & Accessories / Re: 5D III - SD card that will write fast?
« on: November 18, 2013, 11:52:16 AM »
Very interesting.  I'll need to reformat my SD card with the "Low" process from here on out.  I've run into this and the SD card does make everything very slow.  While not ideal, I've taken to saving RAW to the CF card and JPG to the SD card.  That has helped, of course, because of the smaller file size of the JPG.  I've actually grown to like this system as I can now take the SD card out and share it with friends/family if they want to down load some of my shots before I take the time to process them.

107
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II in 2014 [CR2]
« on: November 13, 2013, 02:37:04 PM »
It is funny how people are so concerned with image quality... I get it... at least, I used to.  But I used the Canon 40D then 7D for wedding photography for over six years.  In that time, I was nominated and voted into the top 4 wedding photographers in a large market city twice.  I normally only used primes to compensate for the lack of high ISO performance and depth of field from the crop bodies (they are sharper anyhow).  For these reasons, I have far less $$$$ wrapped up in equipment than any of my colleagues.  There will always be something newer and better, but the image quality achievable from the 7D mark I is awesome, even on large prints (e.g. 36x48).  Anything Canon releases moving forward will only be icing on the cake!!!

I agree with the others, and love the perspective.  It is very important to note that what we have is good enough.  Skill/time/effort are usually the limiting factors, not the camera.  Most pro photographers I know aren't worried about upgrades.  Matter of fact, most that I know are shooting with 1-3 generation old equipment.  The one I know the best has something like 8xD300s and 2xD3s bodies as their arsenal and typically shoot events with a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 @ f/5.6.  I was speaking with a pro videographer and they manual focus everything...couldn't care less about dual pixel technology.  When the canon 24-70 II came out I read an article and saw a video about several several pretty famous pros that were planning on keeping their 24-70 I.  They saw no need to upgrade.

It is interesting, but I often don't think upgrades are about pros. 

But getting back to perspective, I don't think we can forget, people can have different interests in the same subject.  Using cars as the analogy, for some people they just get them from point A to point B, others love the technology, some like the ride comfort, some the speed, some cornering, others--fuel economy or what they can haul.  Lots of different interests....and perspectives.  Yet, they keep coming out with new car models when, really, we've had all that we "need" for decades.

108
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II in 2014 [CR2]
« on: November 13, 2013, 12:12:50 PM »
Actually, the 6D and 7D2 should be a pretty excellent combo! :)

They are...it is called the 5DIII  :o :P ;D

For photographers who want a cost effective crop camera there is the 70D. I am wishing for a 'mini 1dx'. Will be perfect second camera along with my 1dx for 'good light' wildlife work. And I hope the 7d2 has better IQ than version I starting from ISO 100 itself to 1600. Hope......
Yep, this is the basis for my earlier comment that I am worried that $2k isn't a high enough price to make the 7DII "professional level"....really, I was thinking "mini-1DX."

Considering it would be $900 more than the 70D, there is plenty of room/need for differentiation.  But, "mini-1DX" I'd expect to be on par with the 5DIII in price.  As the quick example, if the 7DII was given 63 pt AF, 10 fps, improvments in sensor technology gave us ~1-2 stops better high ISO noise performance, AND there was improved low ISO noise performance at $2k price point....who would buy the 6D, 5DIII or 1DX? 

Perhaps Canon does go this route, kill the sales of their current FF lineup and release the fabled high MP FF body (3D? 1DXs?) so they'd get sales from the 7DII and 3D/1DXs for 2014 and then refresh the 6D/5D/1D lineup in 2015 with the improved sensor tech.

Maybe....really, that would be great and make everyone very happy....but I am expecting a more modest upgrade to the 7DII at the $2k price point.


109
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II in 2014 [CR2]
« on: November 12, 2013, 05:11:45 PM »
I'll go a different angle on this, price seems low for true "pro" level. So I expect something, besides APS-C to be separating the 7DII from 5DIII/1DX. Also, if true Pro level, canon needs to upgrade a general purpose zoom.  I say that as a former owner of the 15-85, which was a great lens. But they need a EFs general purpose zoom with weather sealing and better build quality.

That said, I'll consider buying the 7DII, depending on the specs and actual performance.

110
Lenses / Re: Lots of New Lenses Coming in 2014 [CR2]
« on: November 11, 2013, 02:46:08 PM »
Hmmm.....I'd say the lenses a lot of us want:

EF-M 15 mm f/2.8 pancake
EF-M 50 mm f/2 IS pancake
EF-M 55-200 f/4-5.6

14-24 f/2.8 L
35 f/1.4 L IS
135 f/1.8 L IS
400 f/5.6 L IS
100-400 L II

50-150 mm f/2.8 L (ok, that may just be me)

What we are likely to get:

Something like the:
USA announcement of the "new" EF-M 11-22 f/4-5.6 IS STM

EF-S 10-20 f/3.5-5.6 IS

50 f/2 IS
85 f/2 IS

35 f/1.4 L II
135 f/2 L II
TS-E 45 f/2.8 L
TS-E 90 f/2.8 L

Unfortunate, but probably not a single lens I would actually buy.  But I can see each of those having their place.

111
Lenses / Re: The 24-105 and/or the 24-70 II ...
« on: November 09, 2013, 06:21:39 AM »
I am just boarding the same boat.  I just bought the 24-70 II and own a copy of the 24-105 that I think is good.  If the 24-105 used price was back around $800, I would probably sell my copy if I am happy with the 24-70 II after a few months.  However, with the used price being about 65% of that (~$500-$550), I am considering holding onto the 24-105.  I can think of a couple potential uses (as long as the 24-70 II checks out and is as impressive as described/reviewed) for the 24-105, including as a single event lens (may want the reach), and travel/times when I may not want a $2,300 lens with me.

That said, my preference would be to sell it, if the used price comes back up.  I have a problem seeing it go lower than $500-$550, so I figure I hold onto it, try to use it and wait for the price to come back up.

Of course, if I have to sell it to fund another lens...that could change the dynamic here.  ;D

EDIT---what RC said....

112
Lenses / Re: 24-70 II slight clicking sound when zooming
« on: November 08, 2013, 10:25:33 AM »
Received my third one from Adorama just now.  062 code.  I moved the zoom, I heard the click once...then I moved the zoom about 5 more times, I never heard it again.  I'll take it home this weekend and run it through its paces.  But hopefully this is a winner.

113
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Major IQ advantage of FF?
« on: November 07, 2013, 06:43:25 AM »
The "major" IQ advantage of FF is in high ISO noise.  There is an improvement of ~2 stops.  Which is to say, you get similar levels of noise at ISO 6400 on a current generation FF sensor as ISO 1600 on a current generation crop sensor. 

This past year I went from a 7D to a 5DIII.  I happily shot for years with the 7D.  It is a great camera.  I took many pictures that I proudly posted on the web and enlarged to 16x20 in prints.  People still come into my office and stop and stare at some of the pictures before they talk with me.  Crop sensors are very capable.

I upgraded for a couple of reasons.  First, the higher ISO performance.  I didn't want to use a flash as often as I was.  But I have also seen improvements, IMO, in color rendition, fine detail, highlight performance, and out-of focus blur (bokeh) using the same or similar lenses.  Regarding detail, I sometimes get shots that are so sharp, I could print them at 100% and they'd look good.  That was almost never true on the 7D.

So, P&S camera sensors are better than camera phones, crop sensors are much better than P&S cameras (2/3 sensors), FF is better than cropped sensors, and medium format gives even better images than FF.  So, phone>P&S>APS-C>FF>MF. 

You just need to pick where in that range your budget allows and you want to be...

114
EOS Bodies / Re: How can I choose between 1DX and 5D MARK III?
« on: November 06, 2013, 09:11:37 PM »
I've always liked the reviews over at The-Digital-Picture.com. Toward the end, they list the advantages the 1DX has over the 5DIII and vice versa:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-X-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx

Personally, I bought the 5DIII.  It's great.  You are debating two great cameras.  There are times when I see something about the 1DX that makes me want it.  Heck, there are times when I want 36 MP of the D800.  But the 5DIII is absolutely a great camera and I shoot everything from portraits to BIF with it.

115
I imagine a camera such as you describe will be available someday.  In fact, I suspect it will be named the Canon 1DCIII or 1DCIV. 

But it will be part of the market and not the entire market.  Still cameras will be in that market as well.  My guess is that there are some extreme high MP bodies, but for most people, they max out at 28-30 MP.  Then, they get less expensive.

Think about calculators.  They used to be specialty high end devices.  But they couldn't really be made better, but were still very useful.  So they got cheaper.  Sadly, both in price and quality.  Or computers.  The first computer my family bought in ~1988 was $4,000.  Now, you get a vastly more capable unit for less than $500.

I don't expect the 1D line to ever be that inexpensive, but I can see it coming down from where it is now.  I hope we find a happy medium between price and quality.

116
...why do I get the feeling that camera companies are groping in the dark looking for anything that might sell....

117
Lenses / Re: I'm done - I have all the lenses I need
« on: November 01, 2013, 04:49:15 PM »
...I have all I need to own.  Has anyone else "completed" their lens kit?

I


DON'T


UNDERSTAND


 ???

ROFL.... :) :)

I literally burst out laughing...partly because when I saw this thread I immediately wondering if Neuro had finally done it.....

Congrats Macguyver....that is a kit to aspire too.....

118
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS-1 Announcement Q2 2014? [CR1]
« on: November 01, 2013, 10:41:39 AM »
Doesn't smell right.  Why would they be telling dealers of a price drop for the 1DX this far out in advance?  Are they splitting the 1D line between sports (1DX) and landscape/studio (new camera) again? 

I lump this one with all the other rumors of a high MP camera.  Canon is working on one...and someday, one of the rumors will be true, but none of the rumors have proven true so far.....

119
People that are satisfied taking pictures with there phones most likely never where in the DSLR market to begin with.
Thats just the social pic snappers people that like good quality pics will always want a DSLR but hey its recession/crisis. My free spendable income keeps going down as insurancen, Food and everything keeps going up in price and my income isnt going up.
so i simply do not have money for thoustant dollar bodys and multi thousant dollar lenses.
The last generation canon lensen have had some seriously absurd price gains which most normal non professionals simply can no longer afford.

Like the 70-200 F2.8 IS  that lens wwas 1350 euro the new IS II is a whopping 50% more expencive at 2086 euro.
The same happend with all other new lenses so canon just like any other greedy company in this time of recession is doing this to itself.
A normal wise company would lower prices which upps sales and helps the economu but for some reason in this crisis all companys seem to upp prices which lower sales and then bitch about it.
The greed has gone to there heads.
We the consumers dont have the money for your insane prices anymore ajust to it or see your sales drop even more.
=1  ;)

Two quick comments:
1.  While 90% of the time I believe you are correct and that those using camera phones will never buy a dSLR, I have to think to some degree increasing the number of people snapping pictures, posting pictures and ultimately participating in photography will eventually increase the number of dSLR owners.  The slice of the pie may shrink, but the size of the pie may be growing. 

2.  For people that can't afford a Luxury lens (L is for Luxury), have you noticed the new 55-250 STM, or the newer 18-55 lens.  Honestly, they are getting pretty darn good optically.  Canon also cut prices on the 17-55 and the 15-85, which are optically very good.  So Canon does have an improving "value" product.  Not surprisingly at all, their top of the line, Luxury, products, aren't aimed at their "value" customers.  They are aimed at people that will pay a lot more for something that is a little better.  Your complaint is analogous to someone that can afford a Honda but angry that a Mercedes isn't more affordable.  Honda is a good car (I drive one).  But it isn't Luxury.

120
Lenses / Re: 24-70 II slight clicking sound when zooming
« on: October 31, 2013, 09:07:35 AM »
Does anyone have a video of this sound?  It's odd that out of all the issues here, no one has posted a video of the sound.

Go back one page (pg 8) on this thread.  There is a video of the sound, best starting around 16 seconds into the video.  Mine is actually a bit louder (based on clicking sound vs zoom movement sound).

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 19