August 02, 2014, 05:19:26 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - verysimplejason

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50 51 ... 89
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Pocket Camera
« on: January 09, 2013, 10:07:17 PM »
Some pics from G11.  G15 is a little bit better than G11 but I really miss the swivel screen.  It's handy for landscapes and macros.  Hopefully they bring it back in G16.

Lenses / Re: Prime Lens for 6D
« on: January 09, 2013, 09:23:14 PM »
50mm + 28mm F1.8.  Perfect!  I've let my friend tried my 28mm on his new 6D.  It's sharp even on the edges and super fast AF.  It's IQ is a lot better when used with 6D.

I use mirror-lockup for long exposures on tripod.  It lessens the effect of the mirror slap.

Lenses / Re: Would you keep a lens that required +18 AFMA?
« on: January 09, 2013, 08:54:51 PM »
send it back.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Pocket Camera
« on: January 08, 2013, 10:50:10 PM »
Those are not necessarily pocket cameras but belt bag cameras. :)  However, I almost always bring my G11, also a belt bag camera (unless you want to wear very big McDonalds pants).  :D

If this is a new UWA, I'll be more excited.  I don't like investing in EF-S lenses.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma Launches the Sigma USB DOCK
« on: January 08, 2013, 09:19:39 PM »
^ Do you really expect corporations to code their software to work with Linux, representing a whopping under 2% of computer users? ???

Anyways, if sigma would have had this accessory years ago it would have saved their brand an awful lot of hurt over bad AF!

Well, yes. They could easily have used a cross platform library for writing the application and then it would have worked everywhere. I am tired of companies offering software for Windows and Mac OS alone. It smacks of laziness.

Well no, says somebody who actually has written cross system software, it's quite difficult and expensive. Have you ever done this, or are you simply giving us your unfounded opinion? That smacks of laziness.

+1.  If you say do it in Java, that will still entail a lot of work.  I've done multi-platform programming and I'd say it's not easy.  Even when they say sure it will work, in reality, some codes just doesn't work.  I'm now doing some SAP web applications and a lot of patches are being done just to make one code work in another platform.  It's still easier to work with few platforms.  It's a lot cleaner that way.

PowerShot / Re: Canon Announces The PowerShot N
« on: January 07, 2013, 10:34:19 PM »

He slams the 5DIII as an upgrade - in what world is the 5DIII not a decent upgrade to the 5DII?  Yes, the 5DIII has DR capabilities (and IQ) equivalent to 5DII, but if it's crap, why are he and his friends still using it?  I contend that the thing about the 5DII that didn't need upgrading was the IQ - and Canon did a great job with AF, frame rate, dual slots, sealing, etc., i.e., everything else.
The 5DIII is an ok upgrade to the 5DII. In terms of what matters to me, the 5DIII basically is a 5DII, except with a vastly superior AF. They have similar sensors, MP, DR, etc. The 5DII had awesome image quality, when the 5DIII came out, no one was shocked or astounded by how good it was. Rather, we were told that in JPG, we might get 2 stops better ISO, maybe 1 stop better in RAW. I'm sure the 5DIII is better, but it is rather similar to the 5DII image quality wise and I'm not hearing many 5DII owners complaining about IQ compared to the III. In fact, for months after the 5DIII came out, when Nikon fans were showing reflections in eyeballs at full screen and giggling about how good the D800 was, Canon users were complaining about black borders at high ISO, smearing of details, and overly aggressive AA filtering. Now, the firmware is a little better, LR has better tools in place for editing, and now the 5DIII has settled in as a great camera(as the 5DII was.)
However, for me, the 5DIII is what the 5DII SHOULD HAVE been. If the 5DII had the AF of the 5DIII, then it would have KILLED the D700 in every way. Instead, the 5DII was awesome for video, while the D700 was more of a sports camera. If you want video and great skin tones, you went Canon, if you wanted AF you went Nikon(or 1D.) When the 5DII was current, all I wanted was better AF and I would have bought it. Me, and many other people think the 5DII should have had a better AF to begin with. Thus, prior to the 5DIII, all I really wanted was a 5DII with a better AF. However, given time, technology, etc. I thought that this upgrade would come in at a similar price point(every new Macbook pro with better features remains similarly priced to previous models.)
INSTEAD, the 5DIII came in at 1000 dollars more than the 5DII. The most obvious difference is the AF. So, in 4 years of waiting, Canon managed to release a somewhat similar camera to the 5DII, but with the AF the II should have had to begin with, and at a $1000 higher price.
So yes, for me the 5DIII was just an updated II with an inflated price tag. It looked like a great camera, but it should be for $3500!!!
I realize that you love Canon Neuro, but you need to understand that many people want to love Canon and were very disappointed in their products. I was a huge Canon fan for several years, but in the past 2 years got sick of their ridiculously inflated pricing on release(obv not a problem for some people here.)
Yes, the 5DIII was an upgrade, but it didn't come cheap, the price was also significantly higher.

I think we already know the price trend of Canon products.  Inflated pricing is only for early adopters.  Knowing is always half of the battle.  5D3 isn't overpriced as it is...

PowerShot / Re: Canon Announces The PowerShot N
« on: January 07, 2013, 09:15:49 PM »
I've had a fun time reading those disappointed comments.  It seems that they want Canon to announce products that are specifically for them.  They didn't realize that they're not the only customers Canon cater to.  Frankly, they need to grow up.  The world will not always conform to their wishes.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: DxOMark "Perceptual Megapixel"
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:51:24 PM »
DxO said that as a rule of thumb, that "A 12 MP full-format camera is sharper than a 18 MP APS." I not denying the fact, but can someone explain to me why that is?

It maybe due to the fact that a IQ is very much a factor of pixel quality and not just the pixel quantity alone.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thinking of downgrading my 5d3 system
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:49:01 PM »
You don't have to sell your gear.  You just have to improve your photography.

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
« on: January 06, 2013, 10:28:18 PM »
This is my favorite lens which would be my most favorite lens when I get the 6D.  Currently, it's the 28mm F1.8 due to the crop factor but I expect that this will be very much used when I get the 6D.  I love this lens for portraits on an APS-C.  If you can't get excellent shots from this lens, then you've got a problem.  No one can ever blame this lens for taking the best pictures even at the least price.

Here's some of my recent shots:

Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS Resolution Tests
« on: January 06, 2013, 09:19:30 PM »
The only thing that holds this lens from being an excellent lens is price.  If price goes down to at least $900, then this will become one of the best lenses out there.  I'd buy this as a kit lens with 6D if Canon somehow finds a way to bundle it with 6D.  6D + 24-70 F4 IS for around $2500, I think everyone will be very happy.

Canon General / Re: How many clicks in 2012?
« on: January 02, 2013, 04:29:11 AM »
I've got around 30K from my TI1.  All in all around 90K for 3 years.  I wonder if I can get another 30K next year or a new 6D is due around the corner...

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon DSLR Body Rumors for 2013
« on: January 01, 2013, 11:03:36 PM »
The specs on the D70 does NOT say 3fps. It says "3.0-inch Variable Angle LCD"

+1.  Could be around 5FPS.

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50 51 ... 89