So do you have proof it is a poor business decision, meaning in revenue not your desired piece of equipment. This is also being marketed to a certain region of the world. Where is this lack of competiveness you are claiming? Again the expected answer requires cold hard facts.
not at all. Proof is in the pudding. :-)
I don't owe you or any other Canon fanboy and Canon lobbyists a thing.
Get your cold facts yourself ... or wait until they materialize in CaNikon's next financial reports. Suit yourself.
I'll just lean back and keep watching Canon's announcement. But .. I'll continue to hold my wallet tight and my
checkbookonline banking account closed ... and will pass up on Canon's white kisses or any other sub-par stuff they may try to throw at me.
Until they go under or come up with an FF mirrorless the size of Sony's A7R with a better sensor (!), better IQ , better EVF and way better AF .. at less than 2000 Euros. And some nice ultracompact pancake prime lenses to go woth it. 20/4, 40/2.8 [got that already, so adapter will do] and a 85/2.0 IS.
Whatever comes first. Now go figure.
Thanks for confirming my unstated point and suspicions.