January 27, 2015, 08:55:58 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - pato

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 25 or 24 f p/s?
« on: June 27, 2014, 07:12:55 AM »
Youtube is upgrading, soon you can upload 48 and 60 fps: http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/60fps_coming_to_youtube.html

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Prepping my x100s for the beach
« on: June 10, 2014, 06:58:39 AM »
If you want to get one step further, buy an underwater casing. They don't mind sand and allow you to put the camera on the sand. Just make sure to rinse and towel the case first before you open it (in the hotel room)!

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 25 or 24 f p/s?
« on: June 01, 2014, 03:12:20 PM »
Traditionally TV signals are PAL = 25 (Europe) FPS and NTSC = 24 (America). With todays much more modern TVs and not to forget computers, I'd go for 25 or if you have the choice, 30-60.
The Hobbit was filmed in HFR which is 48 FPS. Yes yes I know, there are people who don't like it, but I prefer sharp images when moving the camera.
Simply put, the more FPS, the sharper the image on movements, the more data on your hard disk.

Wow only 6 years old and making such problems? That is not good. I wouldn't expect that of such a new microwave. I mean if it's some 20 years old, or maybe 10-15, then yeah ok it could leak. But a 6 year old one?!? That sounds more like cheap quality or maybe somehow broken.

This lens can't be stopped down thanks to it's age/Sigmas protocol hack/Canons update to protocol. I can only shoot full open (which is fine for my subjects).

First of all, a modern microwave shouldn't leak much, it should leak barely anything!
Just that you know, nearly every wireless transmitted signal is in 2.4 GHz. That often includes, baby phones, microwaves, wireless flash systems, wireless cameras (which aren't Wi-Fi standard based), Bluetooth, ....

Regarding some mentioned points, 802.11n works in 2.4 AND also in 5 GHz, depending on the accesspoint. Only 802.11ac works solely in 5 GHz, but most devices aren't yet 802.11ac ready.
If you buy a new accesspoint (802.11n or today better 802.11ac), make sure it's a dual-band device, that works in both frequencies. That way you keep compatibility to all your devices (game consoles and older mobile phones/tables often only work in 2.4 GHz).


Technical Support / Canon 6D and old Sigma 400mm F5.6 overexposure
« on: May 28, 2014, 04:19:34 AM »
Hello all
I have an interesting problem with my Sigma 400mm APO HSR F5.6 lens and my 6D. I had this lens already with a Canon 550D where it performed lovely.
Now on the 6D (or after I used it in a very humid place), it always overexposures the pictures by 1 2/3 - 2 stops. The funny part is, the camera shows it's "correctly" exposed in normal and liveview mode, but the image is clearly much to bright. I could work around it by using AV/TV and underexpose all images by nearly 2 full stops. I didn't use the lens for some weeks and then used it again, but same results (in case it was really something with the humidity).
I don't anymore have my 550D, so I can't test if the lens is broken or if it's something special with the 6D.
What I wonder though, shouldn't it be the camera that is metering the light (based on histogram or whatever) and not the lens? If I check the picture after it's made (without compensation) it's clearly to bright in the histogram.
All other lenses that I have work fine.

I believe I once posted this question already, but I couldn't anymore find it.


Forgot to mention something. It's not yet stock, so the price might go a bit further down once it is. I think this might also apply to your countries!

Here in Switzerlands the EF 16-35 f/4L is available for a sweet 1068 SFr. That's currently spot on 1200 USD.

Cool, but on the other hand, I guess no other EF lens manufacturer will ever reach this number in the foreseeable future. I find it actually a tad "misleading".
But still happy about the quality and that it's still mostly made in Japan :)

Hi all

I found a very interesting blog post regarding autofocus (AFMA) and lightning conditions:
Here one picture which shows the autofocus result with a Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L

Also, it's just a few results and not yet a full range of many tests. But still, it shows a big variance depending on the used lightning when using autofocus, or doing AFMA.

What do you think of this?


Reviews / Re: Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Review
« on: January 09, 2014, 10:23:08 AM »
Also got the Samyang version now :)
I am just awaiting some clear, moon free, night sky, but so far the weather didn't play nice with me.
Otherwise it's a nice lens and I find manual focus surprisingly well working with my 6D.

Technical Support / Re: Best Possible IQ
« on: December 11, 2013, 09:56:36 AM »
It's still in the picture data embedded. If you open the file in a HEX editor you'll see several adobe comments, one of them is "Digital Camera Fine Pix X100 Ver1.30". :)

EOS Bodies / Re: 6D: LCD protector w/o air bubbles?
« on: December 11, 2013, 09:50:38 AM »
I've now added a cheap HAMA universal screen protector foil until my glass one from ebay arrives. Sadly I already have a scratch :(

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D- An amateur's review
« on: December 11, 2013, 03:03:48 AM »
It seems as if there is some anti reflection coating and that doesn't seem to be very hard  :'(

Canon saved some $$$ buy just putting a plastic lcd into the 6d, the 5d3 has a glass cover ... so the very first thing after buying is to stick a protective plastic cover on it or order a glass protector, ebay/China for €5...

... but don't dispair, if you put a non-reflective cover on it now the scratch won't be as visible as now.
Now that you mention it!
Damn, didn't realize this before.
Do you have a recommendation for the protector? I found this one here made of glass:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6